+1, and OP deserves better and hopefully she will find a better man when she's ready. How you handle a divorce/custody impacts your child life long. If you cannot work it out, get a counselor involved. Taking a child away from their parent isn't a win for anyone. |
DP. I hear you. It’s horrible and dad is an asshole. But you cannot control a person. You cannot force someone to stay married to you. It is illegal. Or doesn’t matter whether the father is married, cheating, gay or a priest. If he is on the birth certificate, he has guardianship and parental rights. Custody and visitation can be changed at any time, with or without a marriage/divorce, until the child is 18. The misinformation is dangerous. I tried to offer 50/50, my ex wanted nothing but biweekly weekend dad, especially during the tough toddler yeas. He missed out on a ears he will never see because he was angry that I was “taking his parent away”. I was not unfaithful, I tried nesting. Options to transition or rent the house to allow a period to reconcile if counseling attended — nothing. There are two issues. One is the issue of the father’s rights and the mother’s rights; the other the obligation to do what is in the child’s best interest. It both parents cannot be mature enough to do it, than AT LEAST ONE should. |
No, as long as they are married and there is no separation agreement in place, dad doesn't have right to take the kid wherever. She has right not to let her child stay these overnights. Dad needs to visit his son to maintain the connection, one overnight in 2 weeks won't add much to his relationship with the son. Daily contact is needed for any healthy child-parent relationship, not necessarily overnights. |
Are you able to read? No one is suggesting the mother cut off contact between the father and child except you. But there's a lot of space between no contact and overnights at Dad's girlfriend's house after Dad has just moved out of the family home. I would not make my 9 year old son spend the night at a stranger's house just because my husband started banging said stranger. |
|
Otherwise the court will. In my case, there was a guardian ad litem assigned to my child because of the stupidity immaturity and abusive delay tactics from my ex-husband. There were months we were almost evicted and the child had no insurance while I was disabled — ans he threw it to an attorney that did nothing but feed his ego.
People need to set their personal feelings aside for children. It is unfair to put them in such a crappy situation. The answer isn’t forced marriage until 18 or complete abandonment. Grow up! Parent the child you have instead of demonstrating childish behavior. I don’t know all the specifics, but kids are innocent and I get so frustrated seeing them caught up in MESS. |
| If ex leaves the martial home with out a separation agreement in place it's abandonment. She should consult her attorney. |
|
Dad simply wants that overnight for convenience. So he doesn't need to visit his son as often at the former marital house in a different town. I bet he also insists that mom drives the child to the AP house. It seems to him that "overnight" would build his father-son relationship. NO, IT WON'T. It will only mess up the child psychologically.
Just a free rider jerk all around |
DP. 100% this. However remember it is his option to walk out if he wants; he’ll, he could terminate his parental rights ans allow the child to be completely in mom’s custody. Mom could do the same and the child be a ward of the court. These are all rights and options parents have. Each is supposed to always put the interest of the CHILD first. Not the marriage status, not the bank account, not the romance and “love”, not the infidelity or recencge. The CHILD. ALL CHILDREN however many are involved. And any “AP” that loved him would support the best means for that to happen; everyone is going to compromise. No one wins in a divorce. You just try to avoid as much loss as you can. Period. |
This is true there are different terms foe when separation begins too. Virginia allowed in house separation to start the clock; Maryland recently updated their laws around this. Oh, and there are emergency custody hearings that take priority over squabbling on who will pay medical. But it better be worth the courts time. |
|
There is a lot of misinformation and misconceptions in this thread.
Ultimately, especially without a separation agreement in place, your STBX has every right to do as he pleases with your child. Whether or not that is in your child's best interest I don't know, but legally you don't have a leg to stand on, which you but not others in this thread understand. It's clear that you are concerned about your DS, so instead of focusing on what your STBX does, as long as he's not putting your child in grave danger (and no, even a 'revolving door of women' is not considered grave danger), focus on what you can do. Be the best parent you can be. If your child seems to need a neutral third party, find a counselor. Just be matter of fact - "it's your time with your dad. Have a great time and I look forward to seeing you when you get back!" It may very well be in your DS's best interest to spend most of the time with you. While it's not fair in the sense of an equal distribution of labor, arbitrarily deciding that your ex needs to do 50% is not wise, especially if he doesn't want to. I think your gut is telling you what to do. As someone who has been divorced for over 10 years and whose son was exposed early on to the AP, we now live a happy, independent life as my ex has dropped out of sight (he never pursued custody and we relocated, with permission from him and the court). My son is well adjusted and knows which parent has taken care of him and provided for him. Fair? I don't know. But not a bad ending at all. |
This is so true. The advice to try to manipulate and control a parent (mother or father!) through a “separation agreement” which isn’t legally enforceable until decree anyway, is just horrible for the child and their environment. Go to court, have a shared custody hearing, set a trial date. Request terms. Why meet the EX & AP on their level? Do the best you can, to give the child a place of emotional well-being and don’t throw away opportunities for financial security with that child too. |
All seems right in this post, except that the wife has full rights, too, in relation to her son overnights in the absence of the separation agreement. Why is that he can take the son wherever, and at the same time she can't NOT let him take him wherever? It's him leaving the marital home, not her. |
+1, but I smell angry dad troll nearby. He and SMG are always lurking. |
Why should the MOTHER go to court, set the trial etc? It seems that dad wants zero expense AND at the same time overnights at his whim. If that's the case, HE should go hire a lawyer with a retainer and take matters to trial. Instead, he just wants her to agree to his terms without spending a cent. And the terms are not good for the child, either. |
It literally is free to file for custody. You go to the court and you fill it out. The order is the authority she is seeking that is why she does it, because she isn’t petty AF, and won’t create more drama by pouting about who does what first. You request the court help. You go to the hearing. You don’t have to have a lawyer for everything. You don’t have to have a trial. You can find settlement packets online that walk you through all considerations Stupid people that don’t understand the point and purpose of the law and its enforcement. An order provides mom AND dad with custody or both of them shared. It makes it clear I’d god forbis something horrible happen medically or in an emergency otherwise. If they (mom and dad) cannot figure it out, a judge will. And rule. Eventually. Counselors (legal) — my heart goes out to those of you with clients in this area. Good grief. |