Anonymous wrote:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/dea-drug-overdoses-kill-more-americans-car-crashes-or-firearms

Clearly, we need to:

1) prioritize releasing more drug dealers and meth cooks like the 6,000 convicted felons Obama released this week; its only the start, and

2) prioritize ignoring the Contolled Substsnces Act in more jurisdictions which "legalize" recreational use of drugs, as in DC and Colorado (where it's been so successful), and

3) confiscate all guns in civilian hands - through executive order if necessary - even though crime is at the lowest it's been in decades and decreases every year.

Brilliant strategies Obama - just brilliant.

Anonymous wrote:I am 57 years old, African American. I have been registered to vote since I was 18 years old. I have never once been called for jury duty. Not once in my life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's attractive and aging naturally (or at least, it seems that way). And she married Ferris Bueller, so she must be pretty awesome.

+1 And she has a cute personality. I think she's likable and that makes her even more attractive.

Anonymous wrote:Defective ignition switches and software designed for the explicit purpose of circumventing federal emissions regulations are entirely different from the standpoint of federal regulators. There is a NHTSA recall system and GM agreed to pay a $35 million fine. This of course does does not absolve the company of liability for damages in civil claims.

Anonymous wrote:Nobody should be trick or treating before 5 and on Halloween night. Period. Our times are 6 to 8.

I keep seeing the times and day change for some places, not where I live. Everyone wants to be accommodated. It's nice I'm sure but not the way Halloween should be. Go somewhere else if you don't want to participate.

Like changing Christmas. No. It shouldn't be done. Rain or snow, you trick or treat on Oct. 31.

If you show up at my house any other time or day, you get nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone's DH smoke cigars? Mine smokes about two a month. How nervous should I be?

Two that you know of. Does he ever go out with the guys to watch the game or play football or go to happy hour? Watch for mouthwash or a quick dash to shower when he gets home...

Anonymous wrote:I am feeling an itch and it scares me. Strongly considering a fling. I love him very much, but I am craving variety and a different experience.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I worry about the white rice.

Go with Indian or Californian white rice (and Indian basmati) -- 80% less arsenic than brown rice. Avoid southern grown rice at all costs -- from Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he on any drugs that could be causing it? I'm on some stuff to keep my hair and my erections suck.

I assume you are on propecia or proscar, and trying to maintain your hair is not worth the side effects, which have been determined to be more permanent in nature than originally thought. Vanity is not worth the cost.

OP here...the verdict is in, he is GAY. I caught him, "red handed"....he said he had to work late, so I stopped by his house to drop off dinner for him so that when he got home he was all set. Well, he was already home, and in bed with another guy... Case closed. I took the dinner back home with me!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

MikeL wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you do this kind of thing (looking for scams), the entire thing made perfect sense -- if you're looking for people running scams trying to get themselves tax exempt, you look at newly-emerging issues that capture public attention. That is prime ground for scammers. Every major catastrophe and other world event leads to tons of unscrupulous people trying to cash in by preying on people who want to contribute to a cause by making fake or very, very suspect "charities".

So while it lead to "perceptions" as the report said, it really was just the IRS doing its job.

Not only wasn't the IRS doing its job when it approved a bogus "charity" for Obama's half brother, but Ms Lerner personally approved it. Funny how that happens.

Maybe the GOP should convene a select committee to look into that

So you support the bogus charity and Ms. Lerner's approval?

I just pulled their 990s. It appears that it was a not very successful charity funded nearly in its entirety by a loan from Obama's half brother, which would not be deductible as a contribution because it is a loan. And for which it appears he was never repaid because the charity never got off the ground. This charity was approved by the Cincinnati office in the form of a standard letter with a stamp bearing Lois Lerner's name. Not exactly the stuff of which scandals are made. Sorry but another bust.

Anonymous wrote:Keep chasing tail as long as you can because once you stop, that's it.