Is Sarah Jessica Parker beautiful?

Anonymous
She has a smokin' hot body. Better than 99.9% of us even in her late 40s.
Anonymous
Yes in a very natural way.
MikeL
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's attractive and aging naturally (or at least, it seems that way). And she married Ferris Bueller, so she must be pretty awesome.


+1 And she has a cute personality. I think she's likable and that makes her even more attractive.

+2
Anonymous
I agree with the Family Guy. Her face looks like a foot.
Anonymous
These threads turn cruel every time.
Anonymous
No. She is okay.
Anonymous
When she was younger, she was pretty at best.

I mean...Look at the hot guys she used to date. I.e., JFK Jr., Robert Downey Jr., etc.

Now at fifty years old, she still looks good for her age.

But I wouldn't say she was beautiful...Or even pretty, esp. for a celebrity.

She has a long, horse-type face & I never liked her nose much.

But she has a charming personality as well as a clean image in Hollywood so that could be what sets her apart.

And marrying Matthew Broderick isn't so bad. Even though he was much cuter in his own youth. But then again...Isn't everyone...??!
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No. But I think she is charismatic / charming. Personality trumps looks any day.


plus 1. Also, GREAT sense of style, and has a ton of presence. She is more 'attractive' than beautiful.
Anonymous
She looks real to me, and she has a gorgeous smile, eyes, and way of holding herself. And great hair. And voice.

I love how original some of you are in your cutting remarks. No one has EVER compared her to a horse before. @@

I am sure people will say she is a public personality so open to scrutiny. FTMP, though, the meanies here do this to their friends too behind their back.

So trifling.
Anonymous
She's not beautiful. She does have some nice features, like her eyes, but that's about it. And to say she has an amazing body is definitely pushing it. She's fit, sure, but being fit doesn't always mean having a good looking body. It just means she's healthy. I think the actress is very likable, but I couldn't stand her on SATC. She had such forced mannerisms and faces that it made it hard to watch. She was always trying too hard.
Anonymous
No, not at all. And she always plays herself, in everything. No acting ability.

The second pic that OP posted of her is great, though.
Anonymous
To me, she's pretty much the definition of jolie laide.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Whenever I watch Sex and the City reruns, I'm reminded of how I could never decide whether or not SJP was attractive. All these years later, I still can't decide. Sometimes, she looks really attractive. Other times, she looks like the lone child of a horse and that kid from Mask. It truly boggles the mind.


This is exactly how I feel about her. She is a two-face.
Anonymous
And marrying Matthew Broderick isn't so bad.


It is though, because the word is that he's gay.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: