Meh. If you can handle 50% custody, you can handle 100%. The kids are already living in the house.
This at least is true enough. On the plus side (sort of) the childcare schedule is part of a signed legal agreement. Everything about it is known well in advance. You can plan your vacations accordingly. Also, from time to time the ex will want to vary the schedule. If you are cooperative about that, then hopefully she will be cooperative on the occasions you want to vary the schedule. A lot depends on how well the DH and his XW are getting along. |
I don't get that impression from her responses. She seems more concerned about the living arrangement than the schedule. If she continues dating the guy and finds the scheduling problems intolerable, then no she should not get married to him. "Your spouse/partner is will not be able to go on vacation with you or attend a wedding. He has his kids." Yes, he will be able to go on a vacation with you and attend a wedding. His schedule is a known quantity. Plan your vacations for when his ex has custody. If the wedding you want to attend is known far enough in advance, and it falls on a day when he has custody, then he can either trade a day with his ex or get a sitter. You're making it sound a lot harder than it is. |
|
Going from 50% time to 100% time is a lot if the parent wasn't really holding 50% of the responsibility despite having 50% time. Also if anything really bad happens to the mom you will likely be bearing 100% of the financial responsibility and the kids will be in great distress about their mom.
An unlikely scenario but I have seen it happen. When you date a man with children you are accepting this unlikely but serious possibility. |
I’m seconding that 50% time doesn’t equal 50% responsibility. Especially if much of that 50% is weekends, holidays, and summers. The state of MD didn’t care that my ex had fewer than 90 school days, just how many overnights. HW, permission slips, packed lunches, uniforms, projects, and other school related responsibilities mostly fell to me and my DH (DD’s stepdad). By third grade, it was easy to see a pattern of tardies s and missed hw when XH had her. In 7th grade, she’s more self-reliant, but still tardies coming from dad’s. |
The man probably has a higher income, and therefore probably already has more of the financial responsibility. In my case, based on income, I have 75% of the child support responsibility. Going to 100% would be perfectly do-able. If something happened to XW, I'm covered, because I am the beneficiary of XWs life insurance policy. Similarly, she is the beneficiary of mine - if I die, she gets 100% custody and a lot of money. As for "holding 50% of the responsibility", our mutual responsibilities are spelled out in the separation agreement. We both do what it says, so we both do 50%. Again - it's all a matter of planning. Don't marry a step-dad who is bad at that. |
| (Correction) Don't marry a dad who is bad at that. |
I'm sorry your XH sucks but not all step-dads are like that. I'm not. Our weekends, holidays, and summers are evenly split, as are school days. HW, permission slips, packed lunches, uniforms, projects, and other school related responsibilities -- I did that before the divorce, I do it now. I want my kids to succeed at school, and they know they can come to me for help. All the tardies my kids have gotten have been from XW. So yeah, OP, if you want to be a step-mom, make sure you don't marry someone irresponsible and incompetent. But that would be good advice even if he didn't have kids. |
Goddamnit I keep putting step- in front of the wrong parent! It's all so confusing!
|
And, this is the guy to avoid. |
I suspect that you either aren't very experienced with your kids yet (are they very young?) or you are living in a fantasy world. I wonder what you mean by "I am a single dad". Are you actually the parent with the majority of custody? You will be very fortunate indeed if your kids are ones who launch on time at 18 (to college) and 22 (forever) without ever experiencing a major life trauma or set back that sucks you in. And while sure, your partner "doesn't have to worry about" getting on the phone or email and scheduling the Xmas or Thxgiving visit, she DOES have to worry about having the extra people in her home or visiting them in theirs or being apart from you for x amount of time or yadda yadda yadda. It's a very rare marriage where you can isolate the impacts your children's presence in your life from affecting your spouse. Are you going to make absolutely sure you handle all the shopping, the cleaning, the laundry, the gift shopping, etc. etc. if your kids come visit you? Going to help navigate your nippy dog and your toddler grandkid? Going to go visit your newborn grandchild if your partner doesn't feel like travelling? Or reciprocate by travelling when they've done the last four visits? And on and on. I remember my left his second wife at home with a new born and two other kids with chicken pox to attend my college graduation and drive me back to our home state. She STILL talks about how traumatizing that was and it was 25 years ago! Kids are a lifetime commitment. If you're lucky you get them launched and you don't have to take care of them forever. But sometimes life doesn't work out the way you plan or hope. A new marriage partner has got to be realistic that even if you have the best of intentions, the existence of your children and their families WILL affect her. In ways that can be unforeseen, unpredictable, and sometimes not pleasant. Unless you guys are selfish @holes of course, then you can just blow off your kids and their problems at a certain age and not worry about them anymore. Hope your new wife is on board with changing your diapers someday since the kids won't be around anymore in that scenario. You get out what you put in. |
|
|
OP it sounds like (because you have basically said this) that you want a relationship with him but not his children. That really isn't reasonable. His children will be hurt if the person he ends up potentially marrying finds them so unsavory that she keeps her own apartment. As many PPs, blending families is difficult, but the difficulties don't vanish after graduation, they just change. It is fine to accept and plan to never be a 'mom' to a kid that you're meeting as a teenager. But you should have a baseline expectation that you would be a confident, a trusted adult in their life. Because if you don't put some effort into having relationships with the kids, then that will likely eventually pull dad away from his kids and be unfair to them.
If I were a divorced parent and dating someone who said what you said here I'd honestly drop you in a heartbeat. Or at least drop you as a long term prospect. Joining a family IS joining a family, no matter how old/young everyone is. And the idea of having a separate house to avoid them when he has custody I mean...you're setting yourself up as the villain in a disney movie. I mean I kind of understand it, but that will hurt his children, and any guy that marries a woman and lets her go back to her apartment when his kids come over is a bad dad, and therefore likely a bad partner. |
question is not whether you are capable of travel. Married couples often want to travel together for holidays for example. New partner has got to be cool with going with you or staying home without you. |
Yes this is what people do. |
I disagree with this. The kids may appreciate the time they have with their dad without someone else around. My kids see my XH very little these days because his new family is always there and they never get any one on one time with him. Someone can have a relationship with the kids without assimilating their lives. I think it’s fine for the OP to keep her place. |