I think that is an overly negative way of framing this issue. Implicit in monogamy is some responsibility to meet your spouse's reasonable sexual needs under ordinary circumstances. |
Even if those needs don't match up with your own? I am a DW whose husband always makes sure his needs are met. His response to my LD? Great! Now he doesn't even both to try to make me feel good. |
| OP, did she ever live sex with you? Did you ever have a good sex life? If not, she may have married her "best friend" because that comfort and companionship was a priority to her, and this is almost always the outcome in those situations. |
Obviously circumstances are a factor. I said "some responsibility" and "reasonable," not "sex on demand regardless of how the other spouse feels." Based on the limited things you have said, I would certainly agree it sounds like he needs to be trying harder. |
Pp here. I hope you're being facetious because I think that's ridiculous. We tell children to "use words." Grown ups should be able to talk about their needs. |
| You can't give up on sex and pretend like that's fair to your spouse. A sexual relationship is part of marriage. You can just decide it doesn't matter to either of you. |
| OP what turns your wife on? What does she find sexy in a man? Who are her celebrity crushes? Any particular kind of style of dress, including uniforms/costumes, that she finds sexy? |
Exactly. The fact is, since many women are not getting sexually satisfied through intercourse, the sexual "implicit contract" has already been violated. If we get angry at wives for not having sex with their husbands we need to get angry with husbands for not getting their wives off. |
I would freely agree that a wife in that circumstance has a legitimate beef with her DH, and he has an obligation to work to improve. |
This assumes, I would think, that the wife knows what would get her off and has told the DH or, alternatively, does not know, has told DH she doesn't know, and has told DH she's willing to try different stuff until they figure it out. (Also assumes that what gets her off is "reasonable" -- if she needs him to build the pyramids with a unicorn while wearing a clown costume before she can get off, then I don't think he's obligated.) |
Yes, being facetious. There does seem to be a desire for a sexual partner to be a mind reader. Expressing your sexual needs and wants puts you in a vulnerable position. So it's not surprising that people are reluctant to do it. |
x2 would like to know. |
I would say that the DW in such a situation has two obligations. One, honesty. If she knows why she is not interested or what would make her more interested, she ought to say so. There could be a lot of reasons, many of which could be the DH's own fault, but obviously those can't really be corrected if he doesn't know about them. Two, to make real efforts to try to improve things. That might be experimenting, that might be counseling, it might be a lot of things. What I think often happens in situations where this becomes a giant problem is that the only real answer the DW would have is either "be someone else" or "nothing, I am just over sex entirely" and doesn't want to say that because it would be destabilizing to the marriage. I sympathize with the difficulty of such a situation, but don't think it is fair to conceal those things or to demand celibacy from one's spouse. |
| OP is strangely silent when repeatedly asked whether his wife truly enjoys satisfying sex with him. |
|