No serious lawyer would promise a million fortune to a sugar baby. They have all money well hidden and protected |
Around here, it is not unusual. And I don’t know any special needs kids out of this. |
This happened to my friend with about a 20 year age gap relationship. She married a long divorced man with one grownup daughter. They agreed they would have kids together. They had two sons close in age. The husband got cancer and died during the younger son's senior year of high school. |
My very good friends have a large age gap. Husband in 70s is fighting with a terrible neurological decease while their child is in HS |
Maybe visit some occupational therapy clinics waiting rooms you’ll see |
|
When I was 25, I did date a 45 year old divorcee with no kids.
I found him too old, I didn't want to be with a man that old. He just was trying too hard to impress me, he was wealthy, but kind of desperate. He ended up marrying a woman my age who was a fresh off the boat immigrant who had daddy issues (dead father) and they quickly had two kids. Good for him but that wasn't the life I wanted. |
It's probably not true. I dated someone who tried this line on me and he was full of s***. Pretty sure I have a higher net worth than he does despite his higher salary and more advanced age. Men who lead like this often don't have a pot to pee in. Op, you should ask him for a $500k advance on the promised money, just to hold you over, and see how he reacts. |
Yeah I see 40+ men on date apps who all desire kids so you know they want someone at their maturity standpoint |
|
OK, I am going to be totally honest here that OP I would get yourself a pscyh evaluation- just to weed out if you are thinking with a clear head, have any daddy issues, or other issues. Spend a year in therapy-- take an emotional "gap month" for yourself-- don't break up, but just maybe go on a solo trip if you can, be alone and think what you really want.
None of us can say what to do. For me, I am married to a man 10 year older and I can already feel him turn extremely grumpy as he gets older, and he will be 70 when my youngest graduates from high school. The caretaker risk is real, my friend. I am on my second marriage, was married to someoene my own age previously, and he was absolutely immature and it was a terrible marriage. So, I would take with a grain of salt the commenters that say the men who are older must be immature to be with you, 20 years younger. There are plenty of immature men your own age too.... I would say this:at 27, you may not realize your power, or thestakesof your choices.THat isabout the age when I married for the first time.You feel 30 approaching. You want to settle down. Take some time to really assess-- a gap month or a gap year-- emotionally-- life is not a conveyor belt, you can't produce a house and kids and marraige on time always.... You love him, you say-- maybe you do-- but is there any part of that love that is tied to stability nurturing,orsomething you lacked within yuour own family history at home?I had a lot of trauma growing up, nad I don'tthink I realized it at 27.....dig a bit deeper....Good luck!! There is no right or wrong answer here, claim your agency and what YOU want. |
You might not be relying on him in the future, but he will be relying on you for your children's tuition and his elder care. Does he have enough money today to ear mark 250k towards college for you kids ( assume you plan to have 2) and 2M towards his elder care so that 20 years from now with compound interest, you will not have to worry about affording round the clock nursing care and the children's tuition? I am talking about money he can put away in trusts for these issues today. If not, pass. Additionally, even when you can afford round the clock care for an elderly person, a relative still needs to coordinate. How are you planning to set up so that you don't have to keep working while coordinating his care? If he is not 100% willing to work with you to make sure that all of the above is covered, walk away because this is the bare minimum to make sure you are not losing too much here. This does not even address the fact that while your friends will be traveling, relaxing while retired in their 60s with their spouses and partners, you will be alone even if you choose to travel/relax with them because your DH will be 80 and unable to participate. This does not even address the complications with step kids. Everyone family I know with step kids has some kind of tension around the step kid dynamic. You will have a host of issues even before this very obvious one. This guy would have to be offering you something magical in order for you to put yourself at such a disadvantage. Love is not enough here. |
Eh, my dad was brilliant and his PhD, but he had terrible judgement. He passed 10 years aho and I still scratch my head at some of his decisions. What screams troll to me is the exact dollar amounts and financial plans. |
|
That 26M is pre-marital assets.
At his current age and for the life of his next marriage, his earnings then are the only marital assets she is entitled to. OP, I hope you understand that. |
I have a friend who married an ultra high net worth man who was 20 years older than her. She had kids, stopped working, was living the life but when they divorced it wasn't so simple. She got the apartment and some alimony, but lost access to her kids 50 percent of the time, and needs a job in order to have health care and is struggling to find one. I remember feeling extremely worried and skeptical when she met him and got engaged. But of course at that stage she didn't want to listen to any of the possible downsides so every friend in her life bit their tongue. |
+1. 26M is a sh*t ton of money to go around for OP, this man and all 4 kids ( 2 stepkids + assuming 2 from OP). The question is how can OP ensure that her kids and the step kids are protected? She can look out for all 4 kids, and there will still be plenty of money left for OP and this man. OP, does he have enough flexible money ( not tied to a family trust) to give you 2M after the birth of each child? So say 2M set up in a trust for each child with you as the trustee and he has no authority over the money? And he should set up money for his other kids before he even marries you. If you can make peace with your 60s and 70s being more difficult than women married to their peers, and tensions with blended families, the rest of the issues can be addressed with a ruthless prenup. I mean ruthless on your behalf. You seem to be too trusting and counting on his promises. He needs to give you money for your kids up front, as in the same week you birth them. If you agree on a prenup that states this and he starts to falter, get out. Having said all that, I would never marry anyone who already has kids, especially if I wanted kids of my own. That is the real deal breaker for me. There is enough money here to cushion the age gap issue. But no amount of money in the world would soften the tension and insecurity of blended families with kids who don't share the same 2 parents. I would not want my kids to feel that. You are only 27. Find a guy who does not yet have kids. If older men are your thing ( I am same way), there are older men out there who do not have kids. Break up with this man and start looking. |
+1 |