Ignore this idiot MAGA twat. She is lying to you. Men don’t really want subservient partners. |
No you won’t. Only geriatrics attend church. |
She knows it’s a bid deal; that’s why she posted for years and years in her unhappy marriage; she was scared of leaving and starting over. Nonetheless, what she wants is not unreasonable. She can give herself a timeline for freezing eggs as a backup but she’s not over-the-hill, FFS. Would you be so harsh toward someone you care about IRL? A sister of friend? But I mentioned in my PP that the salary requirement is too high. There are wonderful teachers, feds, etc who make less than 200k but are bright and care about the work they do. It’s far more important that they share similar values. OP is ruling out a lot of worthwhile suitors. |
|
OP, here’s the thing. You still want the same guy you wanted in your 20s. Most likely that ship has sailed, for both of you. At this age if you want someone earning over $200K, shoot older or younger, and accept divorced, short or overweight.
However also realize that if your goal is marriage and children, you are still better off with a nice, helpful, faithful devoted guy who makes $170K AND is a good partner, than you are alone or marrying some douche who makes more. Bc you don’t want to be a single mom (whether divorced or by choice) in your 40s. That’s a much worse financial and parenting position than a lower-earning (than you—I didn’t say marry a poor man) but supportive partner. |
| Remember OP, if you and your $150K a year partner both max out your retirement plans for 20+ years, you should have $4-5 million by retirement even if you never do anything else. |