|
I cringe when a friend mentions something she saw in my comment on fb. Can’t explain, I think it’s just bad form to mention it, like a mild form of stalking. Also fb belongs on fb and not in off fb conversation
It’s ok to ask smth like “I saw this cool place you went to, where is it and do you recommend?” But not some vague creepy a** observations like “I noticed you posting about your mom a lot lately” |
Facebook has privacy settings. If she doesn’t like a person whose friend request she accepted reading them, she should use them. -a DIL, not a MIL |
P R I V A C Y S E T T I N G S |
WTF? No one is saving your Facebook feed as an heirloom after you die. |
Adults who use “just sayin’” are pretty high up there on the worst scale. Right up there with “sorry not sorry.” Are you 12? |
| I visibly cringe when people mention certain Facebook posts because of the profile photos of the people who have responded. Let’s just say that some of my high school friends and cousins are less conservative than I am in their social media presence and aren’t always PG in their profiles. So I am cringing because I am imagining my great aunt trying to figure out those profile pics and how I know those people. |
I do use groups in general. Acquaintances don’t see much. But I don’t get down to the granular level of picking who exactly can see each post. I don’t post anything that I wouldn’t mind being public. I actually very rarely post anything anywhere anymore, but I never used it as a “therapy journal”. Anyway, it’s more nuanced than that. It’s understanding context and boundaries about you fit into other people’ lives. Given how you’re making assumptions and generalizations about generations of people in this thread might be an indication that you also struggle with context and boundaries. |
I know what you mean. I think DIL is being rude to the OP. On the other hand, she's also giving an obvious social cue, so OP should chat about things other than what's on her FB feed. |
+1 Everything you might happen to know about a person is not really fair game for conversation. You have to think a little about whether the subject will be something they want to discuss. You also have to read cues. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with bringing up a FB post once or twice, but if you e noticed, as OP did, that the person clearly feels uncomfortable discussing it, then you should stop mentioning it. In the same way that if your son visibly cringed every time you asked about his job, or your neighbor seemed uncomfortable every time you brought up another neighbor. Read the room. It’s weird to me this thread is dividing along generational lines with the older generations on the thread concluding “No, it’s online, it’s fair game for discussion, get over it.” I normally expect older people to have a stronger sense of appropriateness, and expect younger people to have a harder time with this due to both inexperience and a youthful belief that the rules are different for them. It’s interesting this thread is the opposite. If you posed this question to Emily Post or any manners expert, they would tell you the same thing: do not raise subjects that make the other person visibly uncomfortable, and do not demand reasons for why someone might not want to discuss a subject with you in a social setting. Conversations are not inquisitions. If looking for appropriate topics of conversation, ask more open ended questions that will allow the person to steer the conversation towards topics with which they are comfortable (“Have you enjoyed any recent travel?” as opposed to “I saw on FB you went to Miami with some girlfriends, tell me about that”). Or relate stories or anecdotes from your own life that might encourage them to share as well— often sharing and being vulnerable yourself can make it more comfortable for the other person to do the same. I’m sorry, but OP and those defending her actions here simply sound rude and incapable of understanding that a conversation with another person should take their topic preferences into account. This really isn’t even a social media question. |
Not at all. I literally engage in a field that engages in the nuance if interpersonal relationships, and I am very good at what I do. People come to me for advice. And...you could use some. Bottom line, grow up. Just grow up. An example of this is your presumptions- nothing was ever said in OP's post about the content. Nothing was ever said about MIL doing it repeatedly. There was this one occasion, maybe another where MIL noticed this DIL "cringes" when she references anything this DIL posted. So she came here to ask why. This is followed by an enormous amount of assumption about tone, purpose, boundaries, including MY OWN boundaries, which is hysterical. I believe the word "stalking" was even suggested. A lot of mainstream use of social media, particularly FB, started when millennials were teens, and it would appear that the functionality, or any form of communication, just hasn't generalized into their adult world. In fact, engaging, interacting, and communicating is still hard for a lot of this group. This is why you all are now all on Snapchat. If you don't believe me, consider the term "adulting." Consider the commercials- even industry has picked up on this and has used it to sell insurance. You are literally being parodied, and still don't get it. Another fun fact- the " baby voice." This is an actual phenomenon of the this generation, and probably Z, now, where the inflection, tone, delivery, and dialect sounds like a young teen. There's been a ton written on this. This is one one of a lot of literature, but ask any HR person, they will explain. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/05/why-young-adults-are-talking-like-3-year-olds/586000/ I have to say, while this is overwhelmingly true, I work with a lot of people in all generational segments, and there are fully together millennials. They look like Pete Buttigieig or Yamiche Alcindor, as examples. Can you imagine them "cringing" over a FB question? In my own neighborhood, women of all generations, age 27 to 75, interact on FB for political and social reasons, these group aren't drawing boundary lines, and yes, everyone is on everyone's page. These are people who gave up generational expectations of themselves and others, fully entered the work force as an adult, and don't compare everyone to their mother. They haven't established invisible social boundaries. This DIL is socially awkward at least, or just hasn't grown up, or she hates her ILs. There is no social media issue here. It's a personality thing. Because you are who you are, you'll want the last word. I'm out though, so it's wasted on me. |
Teach me how to cut and paste a response instead of simply replying to a comment? Nah, I’m good. But if need any pointers about writing long, weirdly defensive screeds about FB I’ll be sure to let you know. |
Ugh. HR person sounds the worst about social cues. Mature adults don't say "yes, it is, dear." |
+1 That person works in HR. Yikes. |
1. I didn’t say anything about the content of the posts or OP’s frequency. Maybe you are confusing posters? 2. That said, OP did share the content and said it happened multiple times. 3. OP is the MIL, not a hiking buddy or travel friend. It’s creepy to make comments outside your “lane”. If you don’t understand that then you’re lacking nuanced social skills. 4. Why are you assuming I’m a millennial? 5. Weird off-topic rant about millennials? Ok… 6. The DIL is fine. OP needs to find other non-creepy ways of starting conversations. |
Exactly! It’s rude to cringe but it’s better than to give no cue at all and then suddenly it all blows up |