+ 1 |
|
I don't think having one spouse never wanting sex again with other spouse is inevitable. But having the spouse- usually female - with responsive drive generally feeling like she can take or leave sex, miss the exciting sex she once had with nostalgia, and sometimes having good enough sex once the sex starts - that is inevitable for most couples. Some couples who are made of two people with individually high libidos - assuming no resentment or underlying issues - can keep a fire burning with novelty, experimentation, sometimes open relationships - because both people in the marriage are equally motivated by sex. It's depressing if you went into marriage thinking it would be a lifetime of sexual exploration and fun. Which is like getting an English degree and expecting it will lead to riches. It might, but if you expect it will, you will likely be disappointed. |
I agree. OP's wife would be swinging from the chandelier if she was having an affair, just as she was when she and OP were dating. But what this OP wants to know is if the reason she isn't into sex is if it's him personally or just typical boredom. I think it's boredom and he can't cure that (he can get novel in the bedroom but she will just as likely be annoyed the sex is taking longer than it should). Its a "problem" without a solution. If there was a solution, divorce lawyers, adultory websites and marriage counselors would be out of business |
|
Also, to add that it is not about low sex drive, or boredom, or lack if desire for my spouse. But the constant need for validation and backflips in the bedroom is annoying.
|
+1 |
|
All these posts from both men and women display the exact same pattern---women riding the cock carousel with crazy sex with bad boys, UNTIL their fading youth drives them to "settle down" with dependable beta husbands who simply don't turn them on sexually. And it's always the husband's fault.
Selfish women married to nebbishy husbands. Ladies, you picked men to marry that you KNEW you could dominate, because that's the kind of marriage you wanted--to someone you could dominate. But a woman isn't ever attracted to a man she can dominate so easily. Even the one woman said she was far more turned on by an ex who pushed her up against a wall, she called him a "lout"--then says "but it wasn't rape-y." Um, yes, it was "rape-y," and that's why it turned you on so much. But the women know that if they marry a man that dominates them sexually, they lose all power in the relationship to the man, and in a marriage, that is to be avoided at all costs. At least according to the typical "modern feminist liberated woman." |
|
No, it's not boredom. All these women understand that the person who holds the sexual upper hand in the relationship holds the upper hand, period.
They can never allow themselves to marry a man who holds the sexual upper hand, because then they would be unable to dominate any aspect of the relationship. They would have to be submissive sexually and every other way--just like the poster who permitted her "lout" ex to push her up against the wall for sex--something that never happens with her husband--not because he wouldn't want to do it--but because she would never allow it. |
Many women get married and sex is always something with a quid pro quo. OP just wants his wife to desire him sexually. I'm sure your husband does too. For whatever reason, women like yourself--most women being talked about in this thread, most in our society--despite being nominal "feminists," always seem to believe that their vagina is such a wonderful prize that the man in their life has to pay a toll for admission to it. |
"Refreshingly honest" about her being "in incredible shape" -- LOL! Typical DC Urban Mom!
|
Haha this story is so awesome. Seriously, I can hardly think of a less attractive thing to say. |
I don't think having one spouse never wanting sex again with other spouse is inevitable. But having the spouse- usually female - with responsive drive generally feeling like she can take or leave sex, miss the exciting sex she once had with nostalgia, and sometimes having good enough sex once the sex starts - that is inevitable for most couples. Some couples who are made of two people with individually high libidos - assuming no resentment or underlying issues - can keep a fire burning with novelty, experimentation, sometimes open relationships - because both people in the marriage are equally motivated by sex. It's depressing if you went into marriage thinking it would be a lifetime of sexual exploration and fun. Which is like getting an English degree and expecting it will lead to riches. It might, but if you expect it will, you will likely be disappointed. Not quite. Spoiled women who feel they have the upper hand in the relationship, and who are not particularly sexually attracted to their husbands in the first place, have "responsive desire." That is, they feel under no obligation to initiate anything, or to build up desire in themselves. The husband must kowtow and cater to them in some manner to be graced with the astounding privilege of vaginal access. The husband has to jump through an unknown number of arbitrary hoops and maybe if he is lucky her "desire" will "respond." And maybe not. It really has nothing to do with sex. It has to do with power. Denying sex to their husbands, or making them jump through endless hoops for the hope of getting sex--gifts, date nights, whatever the arbitrary requirement might be--is all about maintaining control and power in the relationship. The only way to win this game is not to play. |
But if this didn't happen--women sacrificing their dreams for stable nerds--99 percent of men in the DC suburbs would be married to their right hands. |
This is awesome advice. OP, listen to this guy. He's figured the game out. |
You must buy him plane tickets, gifts, hire baby sitters, fix the transmission in his truck, and Super Bowl tickets to cause him to want to have sex with you. Also, stop haranguing him about his obesity--it's so shallow of you, and you should love him for who he is on the inside. |