| As a former 15 yr old who was sexually active at that age, I would highly recommend the IUD over the pill. Hormonal contraceptives can be a big challenge to get right. I had a lot of trouble, but I didn't really realize it. Why? Being 15, newly hormonal in the first place, and experiencing such intense highs and lows of that age group are all back-ground complicators in mood regulation. Adding the pill can make it better (for some) or make it much worse. It's just a lot tougher to deal with than for someone who has been ovulating for 5 or 6 years and knows their body and hormones a bit better. |
What a weird question. Teenagers have urges, just as adults do. Some wait until adulthood. Some don't. |
| Oh yeah- shame the dad. Good one. |
+1 |
+1 What a refreshing change to see something like this. |
+2 It's awesome |
|
Why is everyone recommending an iud for a teenager? Aren't they linked to all kinds of reproductive problems if used before a woman has ever been pregnant?
|
Yep. It is my job to make sure my kids don't screw up their futures, so I will provide birth control. It is not my job to help them have sex. If it is difficult to find a place to have sex, well, that's okay with me. More inconvenience = less sex. Less inconvenience = more sex. |
Curious, would everyone's mindset be the same if the children in question were 13? Or 11? Eleven year olds can have urges. A girl of 11 could already have started menstruation so she is old enough to need BC. Should a parent see this as normal and allow the 11 year olds to have sex at home rather than let them sneak around? Because I can't get there mentally. I just can't get to the place of openly supporting kids that young having sex, but most on this thread seem like they might. |
No, they are not. And the reason everyone is recommending an IUD for a teenager because long-acting reversible contraceptives (for example, an IUD) much more effective at preventing pregnancy among teenagers than short-acting contraceptives. http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Adolescent-Health-Care/Adolescents-and-Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception. |
OK, if you want them to have sex in cars, under park benches, in classrooms, and so on -- all places where it's much more likely that they will get in trouble for having sex (and less likely to use a condom). |
But the children in question are not 13, or 11. They are 15. |
Right. So the age makes a difference? Because plenty of posts are saying, well these kids are going to do it no matter what so have the open conversation, make a safe place, get the girl on BC. So where do we draw the line? High school age? But what about middle schoolers? They can get STDs and unwanted pregnancies? So is 13 the limit where we should support a sexual relationship? What makes a HS freshman better equipped to handle an adult relationship than a 7th grader. |
Yes, of course age makes a difference. Would OP as concerned if his daughter were 18, or 21, or 45? Would you? And neither a high school freshman nor a seventh grader are equipped to handle an adult relationship, but that's ok, because neither of them are having an adult relationship. "Adult relationship" is not the same as "sexual relationship". Also, as a general principle, my position is that people who are having sex that may lead to pregnancy should use contraception, and that is true regardless of how old the people are. "I do not condone you having sex, and I forbid you to do it" is not an effective method of contraception. |
Agree. My teen has one as do a number of her friends. You know what they call parents of teenage daughters who are on BCP? Grandparents. Consider the IUD. Minimizes the risk of user error. |