All decent men have ample options in dating market through the apps and won't tolerate no BJs or condoms for more than a few months. She must be changing partners all the time, or exposing herself and the husband. The gender of the "giving" partner doesn't matter - if she gives head to women, she's exposed, too |
|
Would be really rare.
Would guess that less than .01% of relationships can survive any length and be open marriage. People get jealous. Human nature. |
That’s…not a flex |
Why would it be a flex? |
What does survive mean? It’s survived the last 4 years, they have been married for 15. Again I wouldn’t do it. But she’s happy, kids aren’t happy, husbands happy (he doesn’t date much) why does it matter to anyone else |
You know this from experience? You are married, monogamous? Do you interview “decent” men about their sexual behaviors for a living? |
| A friend of mine and her boyfriend ended breaking up but she was willing to open il their relationship just to keep him. There were also kids involved and she tried to convince me that there would be “more people to love their kids.” Girl, bye. |
Okay, but how many monogamous relationships work long term? You’ve never had a friend who dated someone for a month or two, a year, 20 years, and it didn’t work out? People protest too much. Sometimes relationships don’t work. |
Because the vast majority of people don’t have an STI. |
It’s a fact, not a flex. |
|
I used to be open minded about this for other people even if it wasn't for me. But then I watched how messy, selfish, and just plain weird these relationships were when I knew a couple relationships like this. People who do this tend to be narcissistic and arrogant. They tend to be AWFUL parents.
I now view it as a red flag. Do what you want, but do it far away from me. |
Because most people are monogamous or celibate. |
Most doesn’t equate no stds. 15% have STDs and that’s high enough for many not to engage in risky sexual practices |
|
I think an open marriage can help a not great marriage become an okay marriage. So in this sense, yes, I think they can last. But you have to have two pretty pragmatic people to make it work: I mean, people who are okay with having no real "romance" with their primary partner, and with having no real partnership with their sexual/romantic liaisons. I think there are people who are like this and for whom it works: people who see sex as mainly a physical need, and/or who are absolutely committed to their spouse for practical reasons (financial survival, or because the spouse has a serious illness), etc.
And of course there are masochists and there are also people who just love melodrama... sometimes that can "work" for a long time, though it's not the kind of relationship most mentally healthy people would want. Bottom line, though, is that usually it is a way for people to distract themselves from some underlying problem that seems unfixable to them. Not a good in itself. It is poignant and kind of sad to me how many of the books/articles by heterosexual women on open marriages start with "my husband pushed me to do this and I was resistant at first but now it's great, no, really, it's totally great, no really!" When what oozes out is a kind of desperation. |
| No clue but wanted to mention that all the people involved into these arrangements are SO ugly. The bathe twice per week, overweight, crunchy alternative type. |