I’m smiling at the level of ego you must have to think you know more about my relationship than I do. If this was meant to hurt or offend, you’ll have to try a lot harder. |
The entire problem is that most humans are wired for serial monogamy. Almost nobody is happiest staying with one person for 20+, 30+ years. |
| I think, in theory, this could work out well for the small subset of people who are capable of navigating the emotional complexities and don’t feel much sexual jealousy. In practice, I think its too complex and difficult for most people to handle, and it’s fraught with the potential for abuse where one partner threatens to leave unless the other agrees to some kind of ENM arrangement. More people, I think, will be hurt by the mainstreaming of ENM than will be benefited. |
We are 30+ years and we are happy. Yes, sex with someone else does have its appeal but not enough to wreck the happiness and everything we’ve built up over 30 years. If we are having sex and I’m face down I sometimes pretend I’m with someone else, but with nobody I know. |
Are you all bisexual? |
|
It’s not surprising that a cheater (unethical) can’t tell the difference between that and enm or poly.
You can’t stay monogamous without lying to your partner, how do you get off criticizing someone else’s relationship? |
Yes that's why prostitutes have never been able to manage to get customers, ever throughout history. And why isn't he slobbering some guys nob himself? You sheltered, sheltered boy. |
|
Lots of monogamous relationships don’t work out, either. And LOTS of “monogamous” relationships aren’t truly monogamous (bc someone cheats).
Adding more people adds more complications; for sure. But to me, monogamy also feels dangerously unstable… it’s so easy to have a crush on someone you aren’t married to and don’t have to actually live with and coparent with. And think that because that relationship is easier/more fun; you are meant to be with them. How many men leave for affair partners and then end up married to AP and realizing actually she’s not a perfect magical soulmate bc life/relationships are hard? I think something monogam-ish seems most stable long term. Lets you prioritize your marriage/relationship but also not expect one person to meet every need forever. Allows you to chase a crush once in a while until it naturally ends which most do. And probably is closest to what “successful” marriages have actually looked like for most of history. Though I’d prefer honesty (with respectful discretion) over lying/looking the other way. |
What you are missing is that the alternative to open/ENM/poly isn't " happy monogamous marriage" for most people. "Happy monogamous marriage" is rare. One of those 3 parts usually breaks. So then the question is, which drama do you prefer. |
Agree. I think there has to be an acknowledgment that even deeply devoted partners will sometimes be attracted to others, have crishes on others, flirt a bit... and this is normal and okay, as long as it is coupled with a deep commitment to the primary partner. And I think there has to be some scope for forgiveness of occasional lapses. But they should be viewed as lapses. Absolutely agree monogamy is of course no guarantee of happiness. In *theory* some form of poly or openness could work out well for all concerned for the long haul. But in practice, since most humans ar not super evolved, not super self-aware and not super good at communicating, adding more people to the mix seems like just multiplying the odds of hurt and anger all around. I mean: a pretty good open marriage or poly situation is better than a terrible monogamous marriage. But I would sure rather have a pretty good monogamous marriage than a pretty good poly situation. For me it is not an ethical thing. It is partly just the way I am wired. I like being part of a committed couple, which doesn't mean I don't get crushes: they are just not more important to me than the live I have built and continue to built with with a man I love. And it is partly the conviction that people being people, ENM usually blows up. |
| ^ Crushes. Not crishes. |
|
Actually, most marriages ARE pretty happy.
"Seventy-nine percent of married men and 75 percent of married women report being completely satisfied or very satisfied with their relationship." https://www.americansurveycenter.org/newsletter/is-marriage-better-for-men/#:~:text=For%20what%20it's%20worth%2C%20married,very%20satisfied%20with%20their%20relationship. |
| lol NO. |
I read the book. Both Molly and her husband are selfish in their own right. Molly fell in love and had a long term partner, but he wanted more than she could give him. Had he not moved, it likely would have lasted even longer, as she was breaking her husband and her set "rules". I also just finished watching PolyFamily on Hulu. One married couple with two kids form a closed quad with another couple. The two women first proceed to have two babies within seven months of each other. Then the second wife gets pregnant again. The show picks up at the end of the last pregnancy. They do not know the bio fathers of the three younger kids. They live in Oregon, and they have a ton of issues. I just don't see how it will last long term. I think they've been together for five years (at the time of filming), so probably six years now. What a mess. |
|
I know a lot of studies also suggest that married people are generally happier than unmarried people. And the overwhelming majority of married people say they are in monogamous marriages.
It is an interesting question how you square this with the stats on divorce. I suppose they are not necessarily inconsistent: even people who ultimately divorce may be happily married for long periods. And it may be that some high percentage of marriages that end in divorce are brief marriages, leaving the parties to then form new, happier marriages that last a longer time. |