| Indian-Am myself so very familiar with this process. Yes it’s a very reasonable way to meet someone, yes this girls marriage has a 99% chance of working. Yet what no one hits on - most of these marriages never develop the intimacy that regular marriages already have going in. Yes we all know intimacy alone isn’t enough for a marriage - as evidenced by the 50% US divorce rate - and similar values, culture, professional attainment, money views matter greatly. But a marriage where the love is in that - of course we respect each other/love each other bc we’re spouses - kind of polite way just isn’t fun. AT ALL. This is what many Indian Am experienced growing up - marriage as business transaction. In our homes we saw -no holding hands, hugging, real joking around or belly laughs and I can only imagine the true private moments -let’s just say it’s done after 2 kids have arrived. Even Indian Am born and raised here going into this process tend to view marriage as a transaction; if they are in that lucky 0.5% they will have true intimacy + all the business objectives met w 2 drs, million dollar starter homes etc. But 99.5% chance it’ll be a good transaction w no true true love but they’ll stay in bc well what is love anyway/doesn’t exist - guaranteed either her parents or in-laws or both feel this way. |
Reading DCUM I’m not convinced love marriages have all that much love either. I’m not Indian but my husband is. We would consider seeing a matchmaker for our kids. |
Yes. I've dated quite a few Indian women who tell me their parents slept in separate beds in separate rooms. Also, plenty of Indian women in arranged marriages cheat. It's their only chance for sex. Thank goodness. |
It’s mostly because women stay even if they are unhappy due to stigma of divorce. |
Indians are Caucasians. But I've never in my life been referred to as white. Iranians are also Caucasian, and there is significant overlap in features etc because of the Mughal Empire. |
Sex is never mentioned in Indian matchmaking. |
Indian- American here and I don't disagree, bit I think a lot of "regular" marriages are this way as well. Maybe started off as transactional in some sense as well or maybe turned into that and lost its spark |
This. Intentions are good but it’s usually a social transaction not a loving relationship and families are often over involved if spouses grew up in India, newer generation here is more independent and private even if they love their families, they tend to maintain boundaries. Parents who live here for decades, often are more liberal and embrace western thinking. |
This is the modern form of arranged marriage. I don't know a single Indian person who would refer to what OP describes as anything other than an arranged marriage (and I'm Indian-American with almost all my cousins in India). There is still a lot of forced marriage in India, but for educated professionals the norm is to have the couple meet a few times before deciding. But the purpose of the meeting is to decide if they want to get married...not to date for an indefinite period of time without any specific obligation. I don't know what fraction of marriages are set up this way, but I know that my cousins in India are considered an aberration in that only one of them had an arranged marriage. Notably, that cousin had previously had a very long-term girlfriend, but his attitude about what he wanted out of his life changed when my uncle (his father) died relatively young and unexpectedly. Otherwise, it's unlikely that cousin would have had an arranged marriage either. |
Wow, that is fascinating. When I was growing up I saw a lot of friends in the Indian American community and always wondered if their moms were happy or how they felt about the arrangement. |
Ok, never mentioned — of course. But I always wondered about this. For the boy and girl involved, these days do they have to feel sexually attracted to get all the way to the altar? I watched a few seasons of the Indian matchmaking show on Netflix and it seemed to work in stages — introduction, some modified version of dating, engagement, and then marriage. Possible to break it off at any time before marriage if you’re just not feeling it. So in that sense it doesn’t seem very different than dating, just you have someone to do a lot of the initial screening. |
Yup, neither method is fool proof but Indian matchmaking is traditionally based on matching families, marriages are less about couple and more about their parents. Obviously modern Indian generations are way more westernized but in traditional set up, marriages are often devoid of intimacy even if they churn out babies every year. |
It is nothing like marrying after a blind date. Both the man’s and the woman’s families have done extensive research on each other and decided they approve of the match. They know your education, income, hobbies and probably more than a few of your friends. This reduces so much stress around inlaw relationships. |
|
In present day USA, Indian matchmaking is nothing more than dating site algorithm and couples have way more power than their parents in this matter.
|
| It’s just a very discriminatory process. |