That may be true (although I certainly do not think it applies in all cases) but does that mean that you think that kids should be in foster care for that long while birth mom gets her act together. Or are you saying that society owes it to her to support her and her child (and however other many children she has) for that 10 to 20 year period. Either position is unreasonable. |
Why is it unreasonable? Society throws a lot more money at other things besides support systems for (often) young people who have become parents prematurely. Reading between the lines, you seem to assume that most birth parents "need to get their act together," are popping out children left and right, and are a burden to society. Stereotype much? Why don't you add their race and economic status while you are at it. Of course you think they need a savior to come and take their children from them. It's written all over your response. Every situation is different and every child born will be in a different situation. A young couple who are having a child but have economic problems can be helped with housing, food, counseling and employment assistance. Unfortunately what they are most often "helped" with is a referral to an adoption agency and encouragement that relinquishing their child is the most loving and selfless thing to do. Until the loss eventually catches up with them psychologically and they perhaps develop other problems, which your society may very well have to fund anyway - such as psychological care, drug/alcohol treatment, a need for housing, food, etc. That's why longitudinal studies need to be done on the long-term effects on birth parents. |
NP. I think that shift is already taking place both domestically and internationally which is why there are many fewer babies available than in earlier eras - [url]https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/10/adopt-baby-cost-process-hard/620258/ [/url] Foster care systems like DC's are also very focused on family reunification. OP if you are still reading - I echo prior posters that if you are able - considering donor embryo/embryo adoption/etc is a great alternative option. I didn't think adopting a baby would be the best ethical choice for me (I'd hate to have been able to adopt a baby because another mother was pressured to give hers up, agree that supporting mothers in keeping their kids is best, AND compared to all the other potential adoptive parents out there (and there are so many that want to adopt babies) didn't really feel like I was the best candidate.) Also foster care is meant for family reunifications - not sure I could emotionally handle attaching and then needing to let go and also I have my own trauma history and being a foster parent/adoptive parent of a child who experienced developmental trauma seemed too hard without additional support of partner (which I don't have) or family and not best for the child. I really respect people who are able to help a child in this way but again it didn't seem like something I was best suited for with my history and resources. I had wanted to do embryo adoption but when covid hit I ended up doing another IVF cycle with frozen donor egg add-on. My child is double donor conceived and I am happy with this decision. I'm also grateful for the biological connection that pregnancy/birth gave us. The big advantage of double donor is that DC will have the option of contact/meeting her donors at 18 whereas the embryo adoption scenarios I was looking at would have been anonymous (but although anonymous is most common, this is not universally true - it can depend on the source of the embryos.) It was more expensive (both the openID sperm was more expensive and using frozen eggs instead of existing embryo was as well) but I really wanted to give DC that option and feel priveleged that I was able to borrow money from a family member to do so. I still worry about potential exploitation of the egg donor which higher risk in US than the international scenario I was looking at preCOVID but just hope that the egg donors consent was fully informed and that it went well for her. I think if you are using a fresh donor you can have more control over the contract/ethics of the scenario but in my case the eggs were already frozen. There can still be identity issues. It seems that most adult donor conceived children who are vocal on-line found out as adolescents/adults and felt a sense of betrayal but that when you are open about their origins from the outset then it is much better for the child and the overwhelming majority feel positive or indifferent about their conception (Data still being collected as it is more recent that it became standard to recommend letting children know at a very young age.) Assuming you yourself don't have an alcohol or drug problem you also don't have to worry about lasting health effects due to prenatal exposure to alcohol/drugs which can be common in foster/adopted children. It is an absolute joy to be a parent and I wish you luck in whatever you decide. |
|
I agree with PPs that children need to be available for adoption as young as possible. There is no need whatsoever for welfare. Npt having the maturity and the reseouces to raise a baby means you are not ready to be a mother.
|
If you'd never adopt or foster, why do you have to post long winded rambling comments that are not on topic? |
You are completely speculating. Every situation is different but many would not be in a better situation at best for many years. So, what happens to those kids in the meantime? Foster care? What about the birthparents who absolutely don't want to parent and couldn't afford an abortion? |
I absolutely would consider fostering if I had a partner. I would also adopt from foster care. I just was responding to the multiple prior suggestions on this thread about embryo adoption etc. |
PP, this thread has a crazy troll with low intelligence and poor reading comprehension. She thinks any post that doesn't align with her is "not on topic." I thought your post was interesting and thoughtful. |
This is the topic: I seem to not get any answers on infertility forum, so posting here. Anyone can share their experiences with adoption process, how it went and if you are happy with your decision. The adoption process, how it went for those that adopted and are you happy with your decision to adopt! |
I don't agree Having money doesn't mean you are ready to be a mother either My grandmother survived as a refugee with 2 very small children in WW2 Europe I have seen the living conditions in Russias kommunalkas |
I get that and that is why I threw in my 2 cents as someone who seriously considered adoption and decided against it. Typically in making a decision people weigh the pros and cons and the alternatives. So in a recent discussion with a friend who is considering adoption we talked about the challenges of adoption and the alternatives which for her is surrogacy. While it’s great to hear success stories it’s also important to know that there are way more potential parents than available babies and for some people it takes years and some are not successful. For me since I was pretty much only willing to adopt through foster care I discussed with my doctor whether I would be suited to do so given my mental health/trauma history and meager support system and our conversation covered the challenges of attachment disorders and other special needs, etc. The psychologist who I had to speak to in order to use donor sperm also discussed other options. Pointing out potentially easier alternatives is relevant and OP can just ignore if not. |
That's where you would be wrong. There are people taking cases to the Supreme Court right now in order to adopt Native kids against the will of the tribes. Literally as we speak. That's why the podcast is interesting, because indigenous kids are a microcosm for larger issues in the adoption industry. We know that outcomes for indigenous kids get worse the further you get from their heritage. So, raised by family members is best, then members of their own tribe if no family is available, and by indigenous folks of another tribe if needed. The worst outcomes are for indigenous kids separated from their heritage entirely. Similarly, the ICWA cases crack open other distressing trends. Lawyers who advise their clients to lie, for example. Competition for babies, to the point that would-be adoptive parents would happily go against the will of birth families. Kids put in foster care for poverty, and courts that set impossible standards for parents to get their kids back. If you are thinking of adopting, it's worth really understanding the industry you are buying into, because the way the sausage gets made is pretty ugly. |
|
To answer OP’s questions: Adoption process, how it went, and are we happy?
We adopted newborns domestically through an adoption agency twice. The process was easy and quick. Our kids are AA. We met the birth moms and brought both kids home from the hospital at 2 days old. Our adoptions are “open” in the sense that we provide updates and pictures, but no other contact, which was the choice of their birth parents. If our kids want to, we will encourage them to find their birth parents, although we will warn them that it may or may not be a happy reunion since I’ve heard all kinds of stories (Searching shouldn’t be difficult because we have some information about them, plus DNA kits make it easier to connect with birth families). Our kids are early teen and tween and seem happy and well-adjusted. I believe that many, not all, kids who were adopted do suffer from lower self-esteem and abandonment issues but so far they are ok. We are very, very happy with our decision. Being given the opportunity to raise these kids is the honor of my life. |
This.This right here tells it all - it is an INDUSTRY, it is run by MONEY and it is (often) UGLY. |
Again, no you don't get it. The question is how it went for those who adopted. You didn't adopt. You are just here to cause drama to justify to yourself that you made a good decision not to adopt. You need to get better mental health treatment. |