Narrator: it wasn't the homeschooling per se, it was the forced religious indoctrination, the parental fighting (which is scary when you're a young person) and op's now apparent scapegoating of her son (he was difficult, etc). You gtfooh |
Shit, I'm in my 40's going through this. My parents are dead and can't answer my questions, though. Therapy helped me realize they were emotionally immature, rather than hateful monsters, and some of their "parenting" was abusive and neglectful. They definitely loved me, but they never should've had children. |
It would be helpful if you could post something legitimate instead of just seething with anger and scorn. I think you have something to say but it's not worth wading through your emotional and psychological screed to get to it. If this represents the results of therapy, it seems like a waste of money. Can you repost saying what you actually mean? |
Yup, me too at 50. It was having teenagers that really pushed me to work through this stuff. |
Yup, my teens got me, too. I hope you take comfort in treating your teens the way you should've been treated. Part of my pain is in realizing that it's not hard to not abuse a child. You just don't do it. |
Why, because she did the best she could? Because she made choices that she thought would make them happy? Because she's not GOD and actually didn't know PRECISELY what the child needed or wanted? Gimme a break. You are ridiculous. OP did what she thought was best for her child. Plenty of mothers don't bother. Mine didn't. |
Op stated that her son expressed that he wanted to attend a brick and mortar school and that he didn't want to go to church while he was still a child. Rather than listening to him and working out a solution where they could both be happy, she railroaded him, labelled him "difficult" and forced him to compky with *HER* will. |
Of course she did. She was the parent. He was the child. That was her job -- to do what she thought was right for him, not let him decide. Do you really think that's unusual? Or is it just because religion is involved? No kid WANTS to go to church! They also don't want to do a lot of other things we think are in their best interests. Of course they are "railroaded." That's called parenting. |
|
This post is useless trolling from a right wing nut job who wants to discredit therapy. Therapy threatens these people because therapists will encourage children to be who they are - not who their crazy parents expect them to be. They view psychology as a threat as they don't want to accept having a gay or trans or a child who doesn't share their religious or political views.
Once your kids are adults, it's a whole new ballgame so drop the "respect your elders" crap. The only people who use that phrase are psychologically stunted control freaks who expect their children to live the lives that the parents want for them. |
In some families it isn't just going to church, their entire life is about the religious beliefs. Homeschooling is part of this isolation from society. The Duggar family is an example of this and it is cultlike. I grew up in an evangelical home like this and it was extremely abusive physically and emotionally, not to mention weird sex concepts. Bill Gothard with his Institute of Basic Life Principles messed up many children and families. I was a difficult child according to my parents so I was beaten daily to break me like a horse. No one on the outside would have known what was going on, I managed to be a likable honor student. Maybe OP is a different religion but because of my life experience, this is what I picture their home was like, including the fighting. OP and others approached by their adult children should care enough to apologize period, no ifs or buts. In my 20's I wrote a letter to my parents and then tried talking to them. I was told that I had always been unloveable and difficult. I was lectured from a stack of Christian books. After a couple hours, my dad half apologized if he overspanked and that was it. My mom only smirked at me and said "Well, we're all grownups now." |
This is the most facile, infuriating response I can think of. You didn't intend to harm him? SO what? If you intended to harm him, that's an entirely different conversation. The fact is that you did, or at least he believes you did. Your motivation has nothing to do with it. |
|
Question: are there really people out there who believe that well-intentioned parenting cannot cause significant harm?
|
I'm sorry, but "the bare minimum" in parenting is enough. It's a lot. No one has to be a star parent to be loved or appreciated or thanked for the job they did. Same goes for kids. They don't have to be beautiful or straight A students or popular or good at sports -- they just have to be your kids. That's all. No one should have to jump through hoops in this parent-child relationship. Normal people love each other JUST BECAUSE. Just because their kids are their kids and their parents are their parents. The idea that people have to strive to be "the best" at everything is side stepping the issue, which is that parents love their children and children love their parents back. No one should have to be perfect to receive that love. |
I’m basing it on OP’s comments in this thread. It’s clear from her comments that she has issues that were likely reflected in her parenting. Go back and reread after you’re done with your tantrum. |
+1 Same. |