This subthread has somehow gone anti-patriarchy, but the original start of it was just one woman saying that even though she might not always want to have sex with her normal-libido husband, she does this in order to have a happy monogamous marriage. If she doesn’t do this, she’s choosing to let her husband decide whether their relationship becomes unhappy, non-monogamous, or unmarried. Men should no longer expect to think of women as sex workers without adverse consequences, but women shouldn’t expect to deny sex in marriage without an expectation of some consequence from that decision. |
Lots of women are both, and I guess there I some overlap. I feel like this is like asking if we are equating moms with preschool teachers. Maybe, in some ways, but obviously they are not the same thing. Some of the day to day might be the same, but one is an occupation, and the other is a relationship. What does this have to do with anything? |
I love this video, but it really only works for situations like young people hooking up. The thing about tea is that you can have a satisfying cup of tea by yourself. If you want a more appropriate analog for sex in marriage, it would be something more like playing tennis. If you’ve been playing tennis together and then your partner doesn’t want to play tennis anymore, fine, they should be able to make that choice, but then you should be free to play tennis with someone else. Asserting bodily autonomy to justify not having sex is reasonable as long as you don’t try to deny your partner the bodily autonomy of having sex with someone else instead. |
No electricity or batteries in the house? Did you cut out his tongue? Men want intimacy, many just don’t know how to request discuss non PIV intimacy. |
Exactly. A spouse is free to opt out of sex (WITHOUT needing up front mutual agreement). Their partner is then free to opt out of monogamy (WITHOUT needing up front mutual agreement). |
I think there are plenty of comments around here that are way too dismissive of the importance of sex in a marriage; but, even so, this is not how marriages work. I get that you think that this is only fair. But, it's still not how marriages work. A woman is entitled to say "no" for a night, a week, a month, or the rest of her life. She doesn't have to announce a grand plan for long term sexlessness -- maybe she doesn't even know that's what is going to happen. (Although, if she just decides not to talk about it, she has to know that the the quality of the marriage will degrade and really shouldn't express surprise if it ends.) That said, fair or unfair, if a spouse is going to go outside the marriage without talking about it, he or she is a cheater. This is a betrayal. The honorable thing to do is 1) express your dissatisfaction and try to reach a compromise; 2) if #1 doesn't work and you want to try to open up your marriage, have a conversation with your spouse about it; and 3) if your spouse is unwilling to sanction an open marriage and you are unwilling to continue living without sex, get a divorce. I know all of that is a rehash of stuff that's been said a million times before, but I guess I felt compelled to make it a million and one. |
we got here because some men believe that women should still put out, let the men use their bodies for sex, even if the women aren't into it. And a man who compares the above to a man going to a ballet because the wife likes it is someone who is using his little head to think rather than his big head. PSA to men: most wives will want sex with you if they find you attractive, don't resent you, aren't stressed , and you are great in bed. |
his tongue and fingers aren't don't do a great job. I can get myself off better than he can. We still have sex because, yes, I love my DH, and I know he wants the intimacy, but quite frankly, if I want a good O, I do it myself. |
That was me who compared a man going to the ballet when he doesn’t feel like it to a woman giving a blowjob or happy ending massage when she doesn’t feel like it. I’m not a man. I just think it’s ridiculous to put sex in some special category of activity within the context of a long term marriage. |
If only it were this easy. This is pretty dismissive of women who want to want sex with their husbands but just don't. They love their husbands, think he is a great person, have average stress loads, and enjoyed the sex life they had. Long term marriage, aging, and hormone levels make their libidos flat line. Nothing to do with the quality of the husband, and the wife feels terrible about it. And here you are, painting a picture that leaves these women looking like freaks and oddities. But this is a depressingly common scenario. |
| When you cough, do you fart or pee on yourself? |
Yes many of the men commenting here are gross. They really want women for only one thing. |
so should a wife treat duty sex like cleaning the dishes? PSA: sex is a special category. Only prostitutes see it as a commodity. |
PP here.. I'm 53. My libido has tanked. I still would want the intimacy, but I would want the sex more if the above. |
I’m a woman, and this seems like a bizarre statement to make in the context of a long term marriage. Yes, the guys who are trying to find women thirty years younger than themselves on the dating apps are gross. But the OP doesn’t seem gross. He seems sad. |