|
the parent has a right not to be "honest". adoptees have no right to know anything other than what their bioparents wanted to have known. they should count themselves extremely lucky to have been adopted rather than aborted. |
The point is that courts and governments are making the determination that adoptees have rights to their own paperwork. That finding out about yourself is a right above the wishes of the birth parent. The point is that adoptees should have the chance to find out who they are. Whether they get that through a birth certificate or ancestry.com is moot. |
I did it exactly as you did. Yes, it is my right to know...and I believe it is the family's right to know, sorry, but I do. No, it isn't my right to request a relationship and dog them.I doubt most adoptees want to do that when they face resistance. What would that get? So the bio parents- do they have rights? No, we aren't dirty little secrets that they can hide, and it is not just one story. Social mores dictated what would happen, mothers had little to say about what they wanted. Until the 1980s, it was basically child trafficking.Stop imagining Disney stories of how children were "chosen." So, I am not expecting anyone to embrace me, accept me as a sibling, or a child, but sorry, the fact that I exist takes precedence over the family lie. Also, for you detractors who think you own the right to your family lore- one day that person your son or daughter, or sister or brother , or YOU that you are sleeping with, marrying, or whatever may actually be a half sibling or a cousin. Yep. Wrap your head around that. |
|
There is a lunatic in this thread who keeps posting about how adoptees’ right to know trumps everything else and who keeps making birth parents’ motives out to be “secrecy.” Listen, honey, people give kids up for adoption for a host of reasons and you don’t get to come back like some possessed boomerang. Be happy for your birth family and kick rocks. |
planned parenthood should recruit you (and other ungrateful adoptees like you) for their commercials. they would raise billions. |
See, that's it. It has nothing to do with being grateful. You just do not get it. |
Why didn't you respond?By the way, man times a "first cousin" is actually a half sibling. You may be surprised to find something out. |
Yeah, no one said it had to include the explanation of rape. Why did you assume that? |
oh i do get it. you should be counting yourself lucky and be grateful. instead you are a selfish entitled asshole. |
I'm not sure why knowing who your birth mother was is considered a basic human right by some posters on here. It isn't a "human right," it's just the law in the jurisdiction where it is valid. The two are not the same. Basic human rights are things like freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Look, freedom from starvation isn't a human right either yet I'd think that would be more important than knowing who your birth mother was.
I do understand that people may want to know about family history for medical reasons but surely such information can be obtained neutrally using a third party and having a full documented family medical history should become part of the adoption papers for closed adoptions. There's quite a lot of "me" "me" "me" "I" "I" "I want" "I want" "I want" "me" "me" "me" on this thread. But what about what "they" want, too? I suppose it's a reflection of the selfishness of our times where the well-being of the individual must triumph over everyone else. To the OP: the birth family reacted so strongly to your sister's queries that it suggests dark circumstances surrounding the birth. Out of kindness and politeness she should refrain from prodding the matter. She already has a loving family: your parents and you. Focus on that. The past is past. |
I’ve read 12 pages and I find the entire idea of the dna matching both very interesting to try and at the same time it could open Pandora’s box.
OP: let your sister embark on her journey and just listen and support her. It’s 2018 the ship has sailed, there is no longer closed anything. And besides the birth family members she matched with might not be receptive but they’ll run their mouths like anyone else and just wait and see. It’s not the older generation or even the birth mother (if she won’t make contact). It’s the next generation. They will be much more adapt to embrace the technology. Maybe send their own dna and be much more receptive to finding an aunt. As for the testing I had to calculate. It’s been almost 30 years since hooking up with tons of randoms through college. Over 18 years and no one has knocked on the door so the worry of child support is gone. That makes me want to see what lurking in the family tree. On the flip side, do I really want to know if some random had a kid I never knew about and all of a sudden find out now. .... |
I'm a Korean adoptee. I have found my birth family (it's a happy reunion). Much has changed in recent years - certainly adoptees within your daughter's generation have access to much more info than adoptees of mine (the first wave of international adoptions in Korea). I've heard that some birth moms choose for their child to be adopted internationally because they know there's a higher chance of their kid being able to find them than if they stay in Korea, where adoption is stigmatized and adoptees are treated as second-class citizens. I do have friends whose birth family chooses to not respond to their inquiries. Obviously it's a possibility for all adoptees and I do strongly believe that one should get counseling all during the search and reunion journey. |