This is a good idea. I think posters are being too hard on OP: If "dh" was a woman who made less, like me, she would be told to suck it up until retirement or divorce and see how she likes her new decreased standard of living. I have accepted that my dh is the main wage earner, and we need to stay in the dc metro to make that happen. We've tried to compromise to make life here easier for me, a person who hates crowds. We have also lived in a rural area as well, and there are compromises to be made in rural places as well that don't even involve salary. To make it work here, I have gone on an antidepressant and also go to therapy to help deal with the anxiety. I also telecommute, so I won't have to deal with local rush house traffic, and we occasionally take days off in the middle of the week so we can enjoy parks or other sites without the crush of people on the weekends. In OP's case, she is the main wage earner and her dh is not, so compromises need to be made for them both, but especially for him. There is no way she should give up her higher paying career to follow him to a rural area, unless she can eventually change to full time remote. |
I’m not sure what planet you are living on. Sure I have enough experience in my 40s to find another job, but you can’t just snap your fingers and get an equivalent job anywhere that replaces my very DC job. |
I AM actually a generally negative person, but we moved out of the DMV and I have never been happier. I am really glad so many of you enjoy that lifestyle, but for many of us it is truly awful. For example, the “fun places to hike and bike” generally necessitate that you first DRIVE to those places (unless as mentioned before you are wealthy enough to live in one of the genuinely walkable safe areas, which obviously most people are not). Some of us don’t want to commute to our leisure activities as well as our jobs. Again, good for you if you like the DMV. A lot of people hate it for very good reason, and it sounds like OP’s husband is one of them, so taking the attitude that he is obligated to just suck it up and spend the next couple decades of his life in an area that makes him miserable is completely unfair. Luckily it sounds like OP is far more reasonable than most of the DMV apologists on this thread, so they might have a chance. |
100%. And whose going to fund your retirement? |
But you can start a business, right? If your spouse agrees to be the sole wage earner for a while and is willing to live anywhere in the country that you want to live as long as it’s not a huge city? There is really no way that you could possibly find any meaningful work in that situation? I mean, I get it if you are highly trained to do something specific that requires a big infrastructure, but I don’t think that’s what’s going on with OP. I think she is mostly very anxious. |
Let’s all just snap our fingers and start a business that will make $230,000 right off the bat. I wonder why no one thought of this before! |
Most of the people I know who live in rural/vacation areas drive a lot. And I’m sorry, if you have a burning need to live right on a lake or the beach, you should not have put down roots in a city and shaped your life around that. |
sure I could start a business doing crap legal work … after taking a year to be admitted to the bar and giving up my pension and 200k/40hr week interesting fed job and not to mention our 3% mortgage… |
Life is long, my friend. Feelings change. Circumstances change. Have you never tried anything thinking you’d enjoy it and then realized that you didn’t? Have you ever genuinely enjoyed something for awhile, but then slowly stopped enjoying it? Because his wife has a job she loves in DC, that means he has to stay here forever no matter how much he hates it? There is absolutely no room for compromise because he decided to live in this area however many years ago? This is rigid thinking and I suspect it is coming from a place of deep anxiety. The same kind of anxious thinking that would lead someone to think that 160K “doesn’t go far anywhere” as one PP said. And while the husband says he wants rural, there are of course many options in between city/suburb and completely rural that could potentially satisfy both of them (small town in a nice location, maybe?) |
OP, my husband and I are in the same position, but in the reverse. We are in a rural state which has gotten significant federal investment for a very specific field of applied research and, because this is my husband's speciality, here we are.
I have developed a career pretty quickly in the healthcare industry because, on the flip side, if you're talented and from a more competitive talent pool like DC, you'll have no trouble finding success (if you can get beyond the distrust of outsiders which tends to pervade these areas). I would love nothing more than to be back in a large urban environment, but I try to look at the positives: a really hefty HHI that goes even further here, in particular with regards to housing, being able to easily afford the best school district here (which is good by all measures, not just in terms of this rural state), and more money for things like home furnishings, savings, vacations, kids educations etc. All choices are a trade off. You prioritize what's most important overall. For us, being able to command an HHI that goes twice as far as it would in DC is worth the sometimes lackluster environment. After our kids are out of high school we'll still be young enough to go somewhere "cool" again. Life is long. |
OP- DCUM found a compromise. Check out this house in Potomac. Your spouse can have his outdoorsy living and you can still be close to DC:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/0/1154605.page#25733047 |
I like this idea, too - and throwing money at a cabin and/or tickets to an Airbnb that feels like home (b/c you go there so frequently) is cheaper than divorce. I have a similar situation, although our marriage is solid. We also don't live in the US so we have a chance to "start over" whenever we move back. But I empathize. |
I don't know, OP. Going through a version of this ourselves. Definitely look for ways to compromise and for win-win options, but at some point the decision for each of you will come down to choosing your marriage or choosing the lifestyle/location you prefer. |
I mean, there is more to life than making the most money you possibly can. You could be the Patch Adams of legal work. Or you could go to Urbana and work for Patch yourself. I mean, my understanding is that your husband is willing to be the sole breadwinner and primary caretaker of your child as long as you will move outside of the DMV, and you have pretty much free reign to choose wherever that is, and you won’t even entertain the idea. |
This is what I'd suggest too. Get the second home and encourage him to spend time there. The time apart may bring you closer together or further apart. |