10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still no word or rage on who raped the 10 yo.

Did she or a non abusive “caretaker” agree to becoming a pro-abortion poster child? Or is she a Child or the Ward and they decided to politicize her traumas?

Poor child indeed. But her parents and extended family failed to protect her from abuse and now the American social/mass media/political monster. Disgusting.

Here's a word for you. It's disgusting. Absolutely disgusting that she was raped. I hope he get locked up forever. I am sure prosecutors are on it.

Now, feel better?

Okay, what can happen now to improve her life? Give her an abortion, that's what.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 10-year-old rape victim sought an abortion. A judge urged: Stay pregnant.
www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/02/brazil-child-rape-abortion/

“ More than 17,000 children aged 10 to 14 in Brazil become pregnant each year, according to government figures. These mothers are five times more likely to die in childbirth than women over 20, and also have greater chances of suffering uterine ruptures, preeclampsia and anemia.”

This is the cruelty forced birthers want for our children.

This story gets extra crazy points because the abortion IS LEGAL!

Correct, obeitions are still legal in her state. The sensationalist article is a hypothetical, what if it wasn’t thing.

Not legal for her because she was beyond 6 weeks.

Not surprised this is too hard for you to figure out, your Republican overlords do prefer pandering to the stupid.

6 weeks and 3 days. They knew she was pregnant before then, but someone waited 3 days to prove a point. That’s the real monster

Okay, dingbat. How do you tell if a 10 year old is pregnant at 6 weeks if she hasn't told anybody yet what happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 10-year-old rape victim sought an abortion. A judge urged: Stay pregnant.
www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/02/brazil-child-rape-abortion/

“ More than 17,000 children aged 10 to 14 in Brazil become pregnant each year, according to government figures. These mothers are five times more likely to die in childbirth than women over 20, and also have greater chances of suffering uterine ruptures, preeclampsia and anemia.”

This is the cruelty forced birthers want for our children.

This story gets extra crazy points because the abortion IS LEGAL!

Correct, obeitions are still legal in her state. The sensationalist article is a hypothetical, what if it wasn’t thing.

Not legal for her because she was beyond 6 weeks.

Not surprised this is too hard for you to figure out, your Republican overlords do prefer pandering to the stupid.

6 weeks and 3 days. They knew she was pregnant before then, but someone waited 3 days to prove a point. That’s the real monster

OFGS. How many WOMEN don't know they're pregnant until after that?Much less a child. You think this 10 year old had regular periods and went to her mom to say, hey, I've been keeping track of my periods and I'm a few days late, maybe I'm pregnant? Your conspiracy theory is disgusting and you are definitely not someone who has ever menstruated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 10-year-old rape victim sought an abortion. A judge urged: Stay pregnant.
www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/02/brazil-child-rape-abortion/

“ More than 17,000 children aged 10 to 14 in Brazil become pregnant each year, according to government figures. These mothers are five times more likely to die in childbirth than women over 20, and also have greater chances of suffering uterine ruptures, preeclampsia and anemia.”

This is the cruelty forced birthers want for our children.

This story gets extra crazy points because the abortion IS LEGAL!

Correct, obeitions are still legal in her state. The sensationalist article is a hypothetical, what if it wasn’t thing.

Not legal for her because she was beyond 6 weeks.

Not surprised this is too hard for you to figure out, your Republican overlords do prefer pandering to the stupid.

6 weeks and 3 days. They knew she was pregnant before then, but someone waited 3 days to prove a point. That’s the real monster

Did you really type that and press enter? Your ignorance knows no bounds.

[Anonymous]

You see, there's this little flag that pops out of the belly button when a pregnant child is approaching the gestational limit for abortion in that state. Obviously this was flagrantly ignored to make a point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You see, there's this little flag that pops out of the belly button when a pregnant child is approaching the gestational limit for abortion in that state. Obviously this was flagrantly ignored to make a point.

I would laugh, but...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You see, there's this little flag that pops out of the belly button when a pregnant child is approaching the gestational limit for abortion in that state. Obviously this was flagrantly ignored to make a point.

I would laugh, but...

+1

Forced birthers keep admitting what they do in terms of “poster children” and their complete, moronic ignorance of how the female body works.

[Anonymous]

So, this story has gone viral and was even included in Biden's little speech yesterday.
But, it is unverified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is getting her abortion where she lives. And has a lawyer helping her. Sick case of child abuse.

Assuming she is pregnant.

Seems odd her lawyer or doctor would go to the local press about this and hypotheticals on future state law instead of discussing how they can imprison the abusive caretakers.

Yeah. You know what we’re really, really great at in this country? Locking up sexual predators.

It took a massive publicity campaign to reach the incredibly low bar of *testing rape kits* from rapes which had already been reported. A few states haven’t even started. Will it shock anyone to learn those states are also the ones passing restrictive abortion laws?

Wouldn't it be great if our lawmakers insisted on testing the backlog of rape kits, instead of penalizing women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, this story has gone viral and was even included in Biden's little speech yesterday.
But, it is unverified.

We had to withstand “People are saying…” for 5+ years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, this story has gone viral and was even included in Biden's little speech yesterday.
But, it is unverified.

Are you as dumb as Glenn Kessler?

From commenter wihntr, who knows more about this subject than alleged fact checker Kessler does:

Anonymous wrote:I participated in the investigation of and prosecuted hundreds of child maltreatment cases, the vast majority of them sexual assaults. I was also my county's juvenile court prosecutor for two years. The notion that a ten-year-old child became pregnant and in need of an abortion is very credible. The fact that no prosecution for having impregnated the child has yet been made public means nothing. I personally know of many cases where little girls like this have been raped. Once when I was in juvenile court we had a 13-year-old runaway who was pregnant-- with her second child.

First, the girl in this case may be unwilling or unable to disclose the identity of the person who assaulted her (and as far as I am aware sex with a child as young as ten is a sexual assault, a rape, in every state even if no physical force as most people think of it was involved.) She may be afraid to say who raped her. She may be unsure who raped her. She may not know the identity of the person who raped her. She may be developmentally delayed and non-verbal. (People with developmental disabilities are particularly vulnerable to sexual assault.) Investigators may be awaiting the results of the abortion to obtain a DNA sample form the fetus in order to try to identify the person who raped the girl.

Second, if the person who impregnated the girl is himself a juvenile-- which is not at all unlikely-- in most states the prosecution of such an assault would take place in juvenile court, where proceedings are rarely made known to the public. All the fact-checking in the world would not get anywhere in trying to verify the story if it went to juvenile court.

Third, because we are dealing with a child and a medical procedure where that child is the patient, HIPPA prevents many of the people involved from saying anything that could get into the public domain identifying the patient.

Someone who knows more about child sexual assault should have written this "fact-check."

You and Kessler sound like you’re trying to find a loophole for why making women and girls slaves is acceptable and not that bad. It is that bad. For every horror story like this poor raped 10 year old, there will be thousands of individual women whose misery will never be made public. You and every other forced birther or forced birther apologist will bear this blood, death and misery on your hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is getting her abortion where she lives. And has a lawyer helping her. Sick case of child abuse.

Assuming she is pregnant.

Seems odd her lawyer or doctor would go to the local press about this and hypotheticals on future state law instead of discussing how they can imprison the abusive caretakers.

Yeah. You know what we’re really, really great at in this country? Locking up sexual predators.

It took a massive publicity campaign to reach the incredibly low bar of *testing rape kits* from rapes which had already been reported. A few states haven’t even started. Will it shock anyone to learn those states are also the ones passing restrictive abortion laws?

Wouldn't it be great if our lawmakers insisted on testing the backlog of rape kits, instead of penalizing women?

Of the two political parties we have, only the Democratic Party thinks women are people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, this story has gone viral and was even included in Biden's little speech yesterday.
But, it is unverified.

Are you as dumb as Glenn Kessler?

From commenter wihntr, who knows more about this subject than alleged fact checker Kessler does:

Anonymous wrote:I participated in the investigation of and prosecuted hundreds of child maltreatment cases, the vast majority of them sexual assaults. I was also my county's juvenile court prosecutor for two years. The notion that a ten-year-old child became pregnant and in need of an abortion is very credible. The fact that no prosecution for having impregnated the child has yet been made public means nothing. I personally know of many cases where little girls like this have been raped. Once when I was in juvenile court we had a 13-year-old runaway who was pregnant-- with her second child.

First, the girl in this case may be unwilling or unable to disclose the identity of the person who assaulted her (and as far as I am aware sex with a child as young as ten is a sexual assault, a rape, in every state even if no physical force as most people think of it was involved.) She may be afraid to say who raped her. She may be unsure who raped her. She may not know the identity of the person who raped her. She may be developmentally delayed and non-verbal. (People with developmental disabilities are particularly vulnerable to sexual assault.) Investigators may be awaiting the results of the abortion to obtain a DNA sample form the fetus in order to try to identify the person who raped the girl.

Second, if the person who impregnated the girl is himself a juvenile-- which is not at all unlikely-- in most states the prosecution of such an assault would take place in juvenile court, where proceedings are rarely made known to the public. All the fact-checking in the world would not get anywhere in trying to verify the story if it went to juvenile court.

Third, because we are dealing with a child and a medical procedure where that child is the patient, HIPPA prevents many of the people involved from saying anything that could get into the public domain identifying the patient.

Someone who knows more about child sexual assault should have written this "fact-check."

You and Kessler sound like you’re trying to find a loophole for why making women and girls slaves is acceptable and not that bad. It is that bad. For every horror story like this poor raped 10 year old, there will be thousands of individual women whose misery will never be made public. You and every other forced birther or forced birther apologist will bear this blood, death and misery on your hands.

I have a hard time believing this story.
Thread:

[Anonymous]

Here is the thing. If it's a family member they may not want him protected. My neighbors never turned in the father from having sex with the daughters. He was the one who paid the bills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here is the thing. If it's a family member they may not want him protected. My neighbors never turned in the father from having sex with the daughters. He was the one who paid the bills.

If a child is raped and goes to the doctor, the DOCTOR is a mandated reporter. It doesn't matter what the family wants. This is child abuse and a doctor who is aware of it is required to report it.
And, the claim would be investigated and prosecuted if true.