10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone wonder how many little girls have been forced to give birth since the activists judges overturned Roe?

Back when this story was first reported I read that it was at least one preteen pregnancy per month in Ohio (population ~ 11.8 million) alone. Who knows how many have been able to access abortion and how many have been forced to give birth.

That the forced birthers are ready to consign these little girls to the dust heap (or the cemetery) is just disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Two years later Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita finally stops his unhinged persecution of the doctor in this case.

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-indiana-ohio-lawsuit-dismissed-0957e66d6f89d6f0eff9ddc08fbaeade

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone wonder how many little girls have been forced to give birth since the activists judges overturned Roe?

Back when this story was first reported I read that it was at least one preteen pregnancy per month in Ohio (population ~ 11.8 million) alone. Who knows how many have been able to access abortion and how many have been forced to give birth.

That the forced birthers are ready to consign these little girls to the dust heap (or the cemetery) is just disgusting.

Conservatives don't care about women or girls. We are expendable to them, and conservative women are in serious denial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Then why did the Indiana AG spending two years and thousands of taxpayer dollars going after the doctor who treated her, who I think we can all agree was neither the rapist nor the mother?

It’s almost like…and stay with me here…they are trying to intimidate and scare doctors from legally treating raped children?

But that can’t be right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Then why did the Indiana AG spending two years and thousands of taxpayer dollars going after the doctor who treated her, who I think we can all agree was neither the rapist nor the mother?

It’s almost like…and stay with me here…they are trying to intimidate and scare doctors from legally treating raped children?

But that can’t be right?

No, it certainly can't be because they claim in matters of health, rape and incest. They are all hunky-dory

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Then why did the Indiana AG spending two years and thousands of taxpayer dollars going after the doctor who treated her, who I think we can all agree was neither the rapist nor the mother?

It’s almost like…and stay with me here…they are trying to intimidate and scare doctors from legally treating raped children?

But that can’t be right?

The article above says he sued the doctor for violating her privacy? Not for treating her? Can someone clarify. I have not been following this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Then why did the Indiana AG spending two years and thousands of taxpayer dollars going after the doctor who treated her, who I think we can all agree was neither the rapist nor the mother?

It’s almost like…and stay with me here…they are trying to intimidate and scare doctors from legally treating raped children?

But that can’t be right?

The article above says he sued the doctor for violating her privacy? Not for treating her? Can someone clarify. I have not been following this.

There is nothing to follow. The AG is big mad that some B itch helped a poor brown girl who was probably a hussy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Then why did the Indiana AG spending two years and thousands of taxpayer dollars going after the doctor who treated her, who I think we can all agree was neither the rapist nor the mother?

It’s almost like…and stay with me here…they are trying to intimidate and scare doctors from legally treating raped children?

But that can’t be right?

The article above says he sued the doctor for violating her privacy? Not for treating her? Can someone clarify. I have not been following this.

Claims were that she should not have spoken out about this, and it was a violation of HIPAA. She claims that she did not provide an PII about the patient so she didn't violate it, which is true. They settled with from now on all such cases should be handled by the hospital's PR team.

Basically the AG wanted to punish the doctor for speaking out. This was there way to shut her up.

[Anonymous]

You see, these kinds of cases don't happen. Nobody is trying to keep 10 year old girls pregnant and carrying to term. You know how you know? Because nobody talks about it. Also, you can't talk about it.

Easy peasy.

[Anonymous]

The physician was cleared of violating privacy rights by the hospital's own internal investigation a long, long time ago. This is not about the facts of the matter for the Indiana AG, but about making sure these cases don't get discussed -- it's about the chilling effect.

And it has had a chilling effect, just not necessarily the one he was going for. The OB/Gyn had to hire her own 24/7 security, and the residents training with her watched all this happen.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/15/1117605629/ob-gyn-residents-want-to-quit-in-indiana-after-states-abortion-law-harassment
Their mentor was attacked. Now young OB-GYNs may leave Indiana

SCOTT: I mean, our residents are devastated. I mean, they signed up to provide - I'm sorry - they signed up to provide comprehensive health care to women. And they are being told that they can't do that. And I think it will deeply impact how we recruit and retain people to our state.

YOUSRY: That could be trouble for patients in states like Indiana that already have a shortage of providers. One study suggests that nearly half of all rural counties in the U.S. do not have a single hospital with obstetric services. Dr. Scott says it'll also restrict the hands-on training she can offer doctors in abortion and managing miscarriages. Some programs may send residents to states without abortion restrictions, but that could be a logistical nightmare. All of this has given Beatrice Soderholm a lot to think about. Soderholm was certain she wanted to practice in Indiana. But lately, family in Minnesota have asked why she would stay.

If you are put in an impossible situation as a provider, it's not like the country has an overabundance of trained clinical practitioners. You can work somewhere else where you are needed just as much but also left free to do the job you were trained to do, without having to hire security. Without hoping there will be someone to give good legal counsel at 2am, and without wondering if you are going to be able to do the job you were trained to do.

This is what red states are facing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You see, these kinds of cases don't happen. Nobody is trying to keep 10 year old girls pregnant and carrying to term. You know how you know? Because nobody talks about it. Also, you can't talk about it.

Easy peasy.

It’s the perfect crime! Just a few thousand broken little girls every year across the country. If we don’t talk about them, they don’t exist. Perfect!

[Anonymous]

“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.”

― George Orwell, 1984