10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And, why does that mean she has to have the rapists baby again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

… when your last argument is doxxing a 10 year old rape victim, you’ve lost the argument.

Yes that 10 year old victim should never have experienced any of this, the rape, the added insult of a state telling her she needed to carry the pregnancy to term, the Republicans foaming at the mouth over the fact she traveled out of state to get that health care. Horrible all around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And also needs to be protected from the Republicans who would have forced her to continue her pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And also needs to be protected from the Republicans who would have forced her to continue her pregnancy.

Her anguish and trauma and that of the very unfortunate little girls like her are immaterial to forced birthers. They don’t consider her and they don’t care about the children who might be born to literal children. Getting to control women’s lives, to limit them, to force them into the lives extremists want for them? It’s priceless and worth any cost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And, why does that mean she has to have the rapists baby again?

She doesn’t. The hospital refused to do an abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And also needs to be protected from the Republicans who would have forced her to continue her pregnancy.

Her anguish and trauma and that of the very unfortunate little girls like her are immaterial to forced birthers. They don’t consider her and they don’t care about the children who might be born to literal children. Getting to control women’s lives, to limit them, to force them into the lives extremists want for them? It’s priceless and worth any cost.

These extreme viewpoints of liberals is why hospitals are making the decisions they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And, why does that mean she has to have the rapists baby again?

She doesn’t. The hospital refused to do an abortion.

Because of draconian laws that do not spell out that a pregnant child is always an exception to the ban and can receive an abortion legally without threat of prosecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And also needs to be protected from the Republicans who would have forced her to continue her pregnancy.

Her anguish and trauma and that of the very unfortunate little girls like her are immaterial to forced birthers. They don’t consider her and they don’t care about the children who might be born to literal children. Getting to control women’s lives, to limit them, to force them into the lives extremists want for them? It’s priceless and worth any cost.

These extreme viewpoints of liberals is why hospitals are making the decisions they are.

It’s extreme to care about women and girls? Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And also needs to be protected from the Republicans who would have forced her to continue her pregnancy.

Her anguish and trauma and that of the very unfortunate little girls like her are immaterial to forced birthers. They don’t consider her and they don’t care about the children who might be born to literal children. Getting to control women’s lives, to limit them, to force them into the lives extremists want for them? It’s priceless and worth any cost.

These extreme viewpoints of liberals is why hospitals are making the decisions they are.

It’s extreme to care about women and girls? Wow.

That’s the officially policy of the misogynistic party the media is trying to get back in office. It’s always someone else’s fault for why the forced birther laws are working exactly as the forced birthers planned them to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And, why does that mean she has to have the rapists baby again?

She doesn’t. The hospital refused to do an abortion.

Because of draconian laws that do not spell out that a pregnant child is always an exception to the ban and can receive an abortion legally without threat of prosecution.

If you are more worried about prosecution than doing the right moral thing, that’s a character flaw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him