10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Are you all really just hearing about this sorry for the first time? There’s 60 pages about it for a reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Anyone?

Why does it matter?

What matters is she couldn't get an abortion in her home state because the law as written doesn't make it clear what DEGREE of risk is permissible. All pregnancy carries risk, what's the threshold? What's the age cutoff im Ohio where the doctor isn't risking their license to do it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Anyone?

Seriously, this is your first time engaging with this news? It happened A YEAR AGO. Read the whole thread and the links in it if you need this level of specificity at this point. It was a very early abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cannot be verified by WaPo fact checkers. Can't be verified by anyone.

There are plenty of men out there raping children, and getting girls who are too young to successfully give birth pregnant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

+1

“Fewer still would survive what came next: Bernard became the target of a large-scale, coordinated campaign of hate, intimidation and professional harassment, coordinated by Republican officials in her state government, in retaliation for her pro-choice speech.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/10/indiana-abortion-doctor-10-year-old-child-rape?CMP=share_btn_tw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

+1

“Fewer still would survive what came next: Bernard became the target of a large-scale, coordinated campaign of hate, intimidation and professional harassment, coordinated by Republican officials in her state government, in retaliation for her pro-choice speech.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/10/indiana-abortion-doctor-10-year-old-child-rape?CMP=share_btn_tw

If they can make doctors afraid, they can endanger the lives of even more women. “Death to all women!, the dirty descendants of Eve!” shouted the forced birthers, “Here is to life! May it ever be male and true and important! Death to all women!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

+1

“Fewer still would survive what came next: Bernard became the target of a large-scale, coordinated campaign of hate, intimidation and professional harassment, coordinated by Republican officials in her state government, in retaliation for her pro-choice speech.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/10/indiana-abortion-doctor-10-year-old-child-rape?CMP=share_btn_tw

If they can make doctors afraid, they can endanger the lives of even more women. “Death to all women!, the dirty descendants of Eve!” shouted the forced birthers, “Here is to life! May it ever be male and true and important! Death to all women!”

This is ultimately what they want. If a woman is "virtuous" she will survive, but otherwise God will kill her and the man will find a hotter even younger wife to raise his kids, "as God intended."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

+1

“Fewer still would survive what came next: Bernard became the target of a large-scale, coordinated campaign of hate, intimidation and professional harassment, coordinated by Republican officials in her state government, in retaliation for her pro-choice speech.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/10/indiana-abortion-doctor-10-year-old-child-rape?CMP=share_btn_tw

If they can make doctors afraid, they can endanger the lives of even more women. “Death to all women!, the dirty descendants of Eve!” shouted the forced birthers, “Here is to life! May it ever be male and true and important! Death to all women!”

This is ultimately what they want. If a woman is "virtuous" she will survive, but otherwise God will kill her and the man will find a hotter even younger wife to raise his kids, "as God intended."

There are going to be a lot of widower forced birthers and a lot of traumatized little kids before the dust settles on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
If only EVERY rapist of a child got LIFE in prison, we’d have FAR fewer rapists. Heck, I doubt most of them get ANY prison!!

Any EVIL person who covers for these rapists should go to prison too. Where would that put Planned Parenthood?

Still the largest provider of women’s healthcare in the country?

What about the little girl fetuses who would have been women? PP should care about them, not end their lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
If only EVERY rapist of a child got LIFE in prison, we’d have FAR fewer rapists. Heck, I doubt most of them get ANY prison!!

Any EVIL person who covers for these rapists should go to prison too. Where would that put Planned Parenthood?

Still the largest provider of women’s healthcare in the country?

What about the little girl fetuses who would have been women? PP should care about them, not end their lives.

Why are you marginalizing the lives of the women and girls who are unwillingly hosting those fetuses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many months pregnant was the ten year old when the abortion occurred?

She was six weeks and three days when she first saw the doctor in Ohio who told her that she couldn’t get an abortion there because Roe had been overturned earlier that week. How soon after that she could get to Indiana for the procedure I’m not sure.

Did anyone question the Ohio doctor? Was it good information?

Yes it was “good information” what on earth does that mean? The governor of Ohio even admitted that was consistent with the law.

So the question is…why are you all ok with that?

Their hatred for women is so complete that they would rather a ten year old child suffer through a pregnancy that will, in all likelihood, kill her rather than let safe and legal abortion be the law of the land. It’s misogyny and nothing else.

+1

“Fewer still would survive what came next: Bernard became the target of a large-scale, coordinated campaign of hate, intimidation and professional harassment, coordinated by Republican officials in her state government, in retaliation for her pro-choice speech.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/10/indiana-abortion-doctor-10-year-old-child-rape?CMP=share_btn_tw

Indiana AG Todd Rokita is the devil incarnate. Only someone so evil would demand a 10 year old carry her rapist's baby to term.