| When I go out with friends, we split unless it’s somebody’s birthday or something, I do the same with my dates. Why would I expect a free meal when both of us are agreeing to see each other? |
| Well, somebody has to ask but by agreeing you shoe your intent to share. If you have a limited budget, you suggest something affordable. It’s not like a good date requires a fancy meal. |
I’m the poster who keeps talking about generosity— I think it is an important trait for everyone. I just booked a vacation for my family all out of “my” money (we have joint accounts and then we each get a set figure for discretionary spending, I have been putting some of mine aside for this) and my airlines miles. I could of course have just bought myself something but that’s not how I value using money. My husband would say he “screened” for generosity based on how I was willing to help him study before we were dating. |
When you first start dating, you're not usually friends like that. Just because you are agreeing to go to out with somebody doesn't automatically mean you have to pay for your meal. Think of a boss taking an prospective employee out, a lobbyist taking out a politician, somebody asking a potential mentor to grab a lunch, etc. I think dating can go either way, but a first date is very different from going to brunch with friends you have known for years. |
| OP, what if you go on a first dinner date and decide you don't like the woman (but she likes you). What would you do in that situation? |
BTW...DD also approved of this. Once she is asked on a date, she very quickly tells the person that she will agree only if they can go dutch. And most men agree. As it is, she is only going out to low cost dates the first few times and it does not break her bank either. Surprisingly, she sometimes goes for several of these low cost dutch dates with the same person (it takes her that much time to figure out if she is interested) before she will agree to a nice dinner that the guy pays for etc. She does not wait for the man to tell her to split the bill during or after the date. That would be really awkward and she will probably never go out with such a boorish person again. She errs on the side of thinking that the men are well brought up and chivalrous and would want to pay, and so she tells them that to go dutch is her idea, before accepting the date. It lets the men off the hook. There are a million little things that she is watching out for in a man, so, if he pays for the date is not what she is judging him on. Also, she feels that her paying for her own share in a graceful manner actually makes the men respect her more. Even the dates that did not work out, the man did not have any ill-will for her and they remained friendly acquaintances. No one likes to be taken advantage of - men or women. One last thing. Not everyone had parents who bankroll them as we do our DD. Most of these men are working jobs in college to make money. It is usually hard earned money for college and other expenses. My DD should not think that she has some sort of dibs on their earnings just because she is a female. |
It’s not an all encompassing test. First hurdle. Slightly different than OP, but usually in dating it’s to screen for a prospective co parent. I definitely want someone who is going to be all out for my (our) kids — who wouldn’t? As the woman in the situation, you give your own body to gestate and nurse, you probably are going to do a lot more of the hands on nurturing when they are smaller or be responsible for getting them taken care of. So yes the guy has to show some willingness to give upfront to even get the ball rolling. |
Impressed by how well thought out this is. What did you teach your DD to look for on the first few dates? |
If this was the whole story, it would be women in business class alone and men in the back at least as often, since women are as likely to have medical issues as men (more likely if you count pregnancy) so there’s probably some of this AND some greedy men. |
|
|
I agree that it's odd that men paying for a date (a very traditional approach) somehow is a litmus test or screen for generosity. I actually don't understand the concept of needing such a screen at all. In a relationship, it is a quality you will either see demonstrated in a variety of ways, or not. No one action or inaction should be determinative.
Also, FWIW, I am a woman and the one who always flies business due to a health issue. My DH and kids usually now also fly business, but that was not always the case. I have also seen plenty of men - and women - encourage their spouse to take their business seat, or switch during the flight. (post was accidentally embedded) |
I also pay if I end up grabbing dinner with my boss or even his boss, unless it’s for work and company is reimbursing them. |
If it’s a litmus test then it’s for both. It’s not like men can’t see through half hearted lip service to split when someone is bluffing? |
Generosity test: how do they treat panhandlers? They usually give them money...... |
| When I was dating, I always made a genuine offer to split the check. My now-husband took me up on it. I guess I sort of noted it, but at the time, I thought he seemed nice, interesting, smart, and attractive, so the check didn't matter much to me. Turns out, he really is very nice, interesting, smart, and attractive, so I guess my instinct about the check was a good one in his case (though, of course, everyone is different). Just thought I would mention this, as a counterpoint to other responses -- sometimes really great guys do agree to split the check. |