I agree. I feel terrible about myself when DH turns me down. His libido isn't what it was (due to age/medications/us being together for several years) and he's gotten lazy in bed anyway. I feel like in order to have sex at all, I have to silently agree that it's OK for him to not fully reciprocate (with oral, for example). He masturbates and watches porn when I'm not around, which would never bother me - if we were also having sex. I'm very pregnant now (so not everyone's cup of tea), but we've only had sex about 3 times my whole pregnancy - and I don't think he finished any of those times. The last time was November. (I'm happy to give him oral to completion, but have lost interest since he won't reciprocate.) I still blow him and he'll touch me with his hands every couple weeks, but nothing else. Bottom line: I feel terrible about myself as a result. |
Ignore him. Just stop answering his calls and texts. Call the cops if he shows up at your house. |
I wouldn't call it "rejection" if she just isn't up for it that particular night, but we are in a place where sex is generally plentiful and good. That's just a scheduling issue, which I don't take personally. Some nights I am not up for it either, whether due to fatigue, illness, stress, etc. That happens. If you know you are going to get good sex sometime soon because you have a generally healthy sexual relationship, you don't *feel* rejected, which is the real issue. "Rejection" is a problem when it is frequent, especially when during those times when the sex happens the wife is clearly not into it, which women are pretty good at making clear in my experience. Different issue, and one that is legitimately difficult for a husband to deal with. Having said that, letting on that it bothers you only makes it less likely that she will be into you, so it is kind of a catch-22. You really have to pretend like nothing bothers you if you want to make any progress. |
I'm okay with that. If that is true, we're both biding time until the kids are out of the house, I think. It would be nice if we could just say that. |
Quoted for truth. Also, I don't know how many times I've read some variation of advice on how to get your wife more in the mood to have sex that went something like, "to have more sex, you have to do [x, y, and/or z], but you can't be doing it to have more sex." Nice trick bag. Thanks. |
You need to get out. Most likely he is having sex with you because his wife stopped having sex with him because he is abusive. She needs to get out to. |
Pfft. You can't LET HER KNOW that you are doing it to have more sex. That's it. |
But I don't want DH. I don't want to kiss him. I don't want to have sex with him. I don't want him. I would like to have a sex life again, but not with him. I asked him to agree to an amicable divorce, but he won't agree to it. I don't want to start WWIII over this, but I really don't want him. I've been very clear with him about it and my desire for a divorce. So... at least in my case, you're not wrong about what "no sex" means. It means I want out. |
|
Have men's feelings about this changed since the, say, 1950s? If you think of the stereotype of women just lay there and tolerated it, were men unhappy? Or does the sexual revolution and preponderance of porn change their views?
Another way to ask: are men's egos now programmed by external stuff to make how they feel about themselves equate to how sexually desirable they feel? |
| If your spouse - man or woman - is denying you sex they are not living up to their marital obligations. They are leaving you with no ethical way for you to get your sexual needs met. Then they are pissed when you stray. |
Some thoughts in no particular order: 1. Maybe externally created expectations have made guys less happy with what they have. 2. Maybe externally created expectations have made women more likely to reject initiations. 3. Stereotype of the asexual wife in the 1950s was probably overblown. 4. Men in the 1950s may have been as or more unhappy with their sex lives than guys now. 5. Less feminism and (the corresponding) manlier men may have made wives feel more sexual toward their husbands in the 50s.* * I'm not trying to bash feminism. But I think the messages of feminism have made a lot of guys confused about how to be the "confident"/dominant guy that a lot of women seem attracted to without being disrespectful to the equality of women. (A lot of women too, perhaps). |
|
A different thought: if a woman expressed this to me (another woman), I would tell her to seek counseling. No sex is deeply frustrating, but soul-rending despair over being told "no" is a mental health issue for which y'all need therapy. How can you base your entire identity on what someone else is doing or not doing? That's needy and weak and not healthy. No one's identity should be that dependent on his/her spouse's attitude.
|
07:34 again. So what? You need to talk to your spouse and say "I want to have a sex life. I want to have it with you. But if you won't have sex with me, I am going to go outside the relationship. What can we do to make this relationship work sexually?" If he/she is pissed about that, too bad. No sex and no outside excursions is not fair. |
Sex is a fundamental human need. When you commit to monogamy, you put satisfaction of that need entirely in the hands of one person. If that person says "no" once but mostly says "yes" at other times, then you are absolutely correct. But when rejection becomes consistent, the "no" on a particular night isn't just that night. Rather, the rejected spouse can see a life time of sexual rejection stretching out into the future. |
So are you legally separated? What are you waiting for? |