Thoughts on the “other woman”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

You sound dumb. It's takes two to have a relationship so how is she irrelevant when she's the other party in the relationship w/a married man? Does she become relevant if she gives the husband an STD? Is she relevant is she gets pregnant and suddenly your children have a new sibling? Or when he decides he wants to leave his wife and then your children are spending half their time at this woman's place with their dad? Clearly the husband is at fault, clearly he made the commitment, but too many women are willing to entangle themselves and ultimately have a hand in wrecking lives.

I can tell you this, the betrayed wife will never forget the OW. She has created mental trauma in another woman—and often her kids. You think it doesn’t matter. Sure- it wasn’t a big deal. The wife will remember everything about the OW and her image will be seared on her brain, not in a good way. The rest of the OW’s life she has invited all kinds of negative energy her way. It is so crazy to have the mindset that contributing to an innocent person’s anguish and trauma is not partly on you. Mental gymnastics are big on the cheating game for both parties.

I do believe if you keep putting bad out in the universe and knowingly harming other people, being dishonest, lacking integrity, it eventually catches up with you. Not necessarily karma per se, but going through life participating in things you know will cause great anguish in someone else will eventually bite you.

This is something people who perceive themselves as noble victims tell themselves.

I think its something everyone that has integrity and morals say about someone who doesn't. Case in point on what is happening to Trump and his cronies right now.

[Anonymous]

When I was young - late teens and early twenties - and at the height of my physical beauty, I engaged in some promiscuity which included some one night stands. It wasn’t until years later that I understood the roots of this behavior, but at the time I didn’t see it as anything other than me experiencing my sexuality with men I found attractive in mutually fulfilling encounters.

One night I found myself in bed with a visiting professor of a local university who I had met and engaged in mutual seduction with at a local bar over billiards and drinks. We had not yet consummated the coupling when he let slip that he had a wife and kids back home in Canada. Despite his protestations, and I realize in retrospect that I was lucky he didn’t just force himself on me, I got out of bed got dressed and left. I told him as I was dressing that I could never knowingly be a participant in infidelity - that even if it wasn’t my promises at issue, I lived by a strong code that I owed respect to other peoples’ marriages. Of course the whole point of publication of wedding banns is to make known impediments to marriage, and the publication of wedding announcements is to inform the community of the status of certain persons. Rings are another, better public announcement of unavailability - which is of course why so many men don’t wear them. They blame the job or whatever - fine, take it off from 9-5 but put it on all other times - all kinds of excuses why that isn’t practical. I would never trust a husband who wouldn’t wear his ring willingly and enthusiastically.

I found myself tricked once or twice in my travels, and those experiences upset me to think about. I have no sympathy for single women or men who knowingly engage in affairs with married people - in particular if they know the married person is a parent. I think it requires a certain level of narcissism and sociopathy in a person’s psychological makeup to engage in such behavior, and some do it exclusively. It’s gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts: poor character, dishonest, untrustworthy, zero empathy, classless, selfish, low self-esteem and can’t find a single man. Trash person that deserves all harm she invites in her life by doing this to another woman.

+1 pretty much sums up my thoughts on the matter too.

manipulative and calculating and a total lack of reality of the kind of person they really are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I was young - late teens and early twenties - and at the height of my physical beauty, I engaged in some promiscuity which included some one night stands. It wasn’t until years later that I understood the roots of this behavior, but at the time I didn’t see it as anything other than me experiencing my sexuality with men I found attractive in mutually fulfilling encounters.

One night I found myself in bed with a visiting professor of a local university who I had met and engaged in mutual seduction with at a local bar over billiards and drinks. We had not yet consummated the coupling when he let slip that he had a wife and kids back home in Canada. Despite his protestations, and I realize in retrospect that I was lucky he didn’t just force himself on me, I got out of bed got dressed and left. I told him as I was dressing that I could never knowingly be a participant in infidelity - that even if it wasn’t my promises at issue, I lived by a strong code that I owed respect to other peoples’ marriages. Of course the whole point of publication of wedding banns is to make known impediments to marriage, and the publication of wedding announcements is to inform the community of the status of certain persons. Rings are another, better public announcement of unavailability - which is of course why so many men don’t wear them. They blame the job or whatever - fine, take it off from 9-5 but put it on all other times - all kinds of excuses why that isn’t practical. I would never trust a husband who wouldn’t wear his ring willingly and enthusiastically.

I found myself tricked once or twice in my travels, and those experiences upset me to think about. I have no sympathy for single women or men who knowingly engage in affairs with married people - in particular if they know the married person is a parent. I think it requires a certain level of narcissism and sociopathy in a person’s psychological makeup to engage in such behavior, and some do it exclusively. It’s gross.

That's because you are a decent person. I also was raised it was wrong to have sex, much less openly throw myself at married men (or even men in committed relationships to someone else). My brother was taught the same. I think some people were raised to see infidelity in their own homes and dysfunction that they see nothing wrong with it. The values and integrity aren't there. They saw lying was okay if it meant a way of fulfilling a desire. Everyone else be damned. Me, me, me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was young - late teens and early twenties - and at the height of my physical beauty, I engaged in some promiscuity which included some one night stands. It wasn’t until years later that I understood the roots of this behavior, but at the time I didn’t see it as anything other than me experiencing my sexuality with men I found attractive in mutually fulfilling encounters.

One night I found myself in bed with a visiting professor of a local university who I had met and engaged in mutual seduction with at a local bar over billiards and drinks. We had not yet consummated the coupling when he let slip that he had a wife and kids back home in Canada. Despite his protestations, and I realize in retrospect that I was lucky he didn’t just force himself on me, I got out of bed got dressed and left. I told him as I was dressing that I could never knowingly be a participant in infidelity - that even if it wasn’t my promises at issue, I lived by a strong code that I owed respect to other peoples’ marriages. Of course the whole point of publication of wedding banns is to make known impediments to marriage, and the publication of wedding announcements is to inform the community of the status of certain persons. Rings are another, better public announcement of unavailability - which is of course why so many men don’t wear them. They blame the job or whatever - fine, take it off from 9-5 but put it on all other times - all kinds of excuses why that isn’t practical. I would never trust a husband who wouldn’t wear his ring willingly and enthusiastically.

I found myself tricked once or twice in my travels, and those experiences upset me to think about. I have no sympathy for single women or men who knowingly engage in affairs with married people - in particular if they know the married person is a parent. I think it requires a certain level of narcissism and sociopathy in a person’s psychological makeup to engage in such behavior, and some do it exclusively. It’s gross.

That's because you are a decent person. I also was raised it was wrong to have sex, much less openly throw myself at married men (or even men in committed relationships to someone else). My brother was taught the same. I think some people were raised to see infidelity in their own homes and dysfunction that they see nothing wrong with it. The values and integrity aren't there. They saw lying was okay if it meant a way of fulfilling a desire. Everyone else be damned. Me, me, me.

It says a lot about a person's character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

The OW in my world also was married and claimed at the get-go it would be no-strings. As time went on she started the pressure, started bringing up leaving her spouse and hinting for ex to do the same. I found that she monitored everything about me and my kids. When we were getting a new puppy she tried to talk my husband out of doing it because she saw that meant he was invested in the marriage still. If he had a family obligation she would try to belittle it which cause many fights at the end. She openly stated she was jealous of the wife. All from someone that claimed it would just be about sex. Yeah right. This Sumner woman saw Adams wife was pregnant again and the writing was on the wall that she wasn’t going to get him to leave the wife so she went scorched earth.

That's true but the core issue is that your exH was not monogamous. He was equally enjoying his family time AND his time with OW. I had a similar situation: my marriage to exH as very much alive, he seemed to be happy and never tried to discuss if anything bothered him. That beats me the most that he didn't even try to communicate what I was doing wrong, to give us a chance! Probably I wasn't doing anything wrong and marital therapy would have revealed his adultery with multiple women. Cheaters try to avoid couples therapy as anathema.

The OW controlled all aspects (creepy as I didn't even know what was causing our conflicts): she would throw a tantrum when learning my exH took me for a romantic trip to Caribbean; brainwashed him that I am too crazy about our child being a competitive athlete. ExH would have to devote a lot of time driving son to practices and it wasn't in HER interests to keep father involved in family too much. She was also married but her own kids were grown up college students.

I felt so sick when this double life was discovered (it lasted for 8 years before our son found out!). I realized that my exH made so many harmful for family's well-being decisions because of that "side influence".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

The OW in my world also was married and claimed at the get-go it would be no-strings. As time went on she started the pressure, started bringing up leaving her spouse and hinting for ex to do the same. I found that she monitored everything about me and my kids. When we were getting a new puppy she tried to talk my husband out of doing it because she saw that meant he was invested in the marriage still. If he had a family obligation she would try to belittle it which cause many fights at the end. She openly stated she was jealous of the wife. All from someone that claimed it would just be about sex. Yeah right. This Sumner woman saw Adams wife was pregnant again and the writing was on the wall that she wasn’t going to get him to leave the wife so she went scorched earth.

That's true but the core issue is that your exH was not monogamous. He was equally enjoying his family time AND his time with OW. I had a similar situation: my marriage to exH as very much alive, he seemed to be happy and never tried to discuss if anything bothered him. That beats me the most that he didn't even try to communicate what I was doing wrong, to give us a chance! Probably I wasn't doing anything wrong and marital therapy would have revealed his adultery with multiple women. Cheaters try to avoid couples therapy as anathema.

The OW controlled all aspects (creepy as I didn't even know what was causing our conflicts): she would throw a tantrum when learning my exH took me for a romantic trip to Caribbean; brainwashed him that I am too crazy about our child being a competitive athlete. ExH would have to devote a lot of time driving son to practices and it wasn't in HER interests to keep father involved in family too much. She was also married but her own kids were grown up college students.

I felt so sick when this double life was discovered (it lasted for 8 years before our son found out!). I realized that my exH made so many harmful for family's well-being decisions because of that "side influence".

+1. I am so sorry your son was the one to discover it. How traumatizing for all of you.

And, yes, you describe how this situation between two married affair partners is never “just sex”. It’s negativity bleeds into the family and causes all kind of disharmony where the family has zero idea what is causing it. Manipulation and pouting and fighting is part of the drama in these “no strings/won’t leave our marriage” rules of dysfunctional affairs. The people harmed (spouse/kids) are really psychologically tormented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

The OW in my world also was married and claimed at the get-go it would be no-strings. As time went on she started the pressure, started bringing up leaving her spouse and hinting for ex to do the same. I found that she monitored everything about me and my kids. When we were getting a new puppy she tried to talk my husband out of doing it because she saw that meant he was invested in the marriage still. If he had a family obligation she would try to belittle it which cause many fights at the end. She openly stated she was jealous of the wife. All from someone that claimed it would just be about sex. Yeah right. This Sumner woman saw Adams wife was pregnant again and the writing was on the wall that she wasn’t going to get him to leave the wife so she went scorched earth.

That's true but the core issue is that your exH was not monogamous. He was equally enjoying his family time AND his time with OW. I had a similar situation: my marriage to exH as very much alive, he seemed to be happy and never tried to discuss if anything bothered him. That beats me the most that he didn't even try to communicate what I was doing wrong, to give us a chance! Probably I wasn't doing anything wrong and marital therapy would have revealed his adultery with multiple women. Cheaters try to avoid couples therapy as anathema.

The OW controlled all aspects (creepy as I didn't even know what was causing our conflicts): she would throw a tantrum when learning my exH took me for a romantic trip to Caribbean; brainwashed him that I am too crazy about our child being a competitive athlete. ExH would have to devote a lot of time driving son to practices and it wasn't in HER interests to keep father involved in family too much. She was also married but her own kids were grown up college students.

I felt so sick when this double life was discovered (it lasted for 8 years before our son found out!). I realized that my exH made so many harmful for family's well-being decisions because of that "side influence".

This is heart breaking to read. So sorry. And, yet, that OW would be one on this site swearing she didn't cause any harm to you because she never was going to break up a marriage/family...all the while doing the things you described and trying to steer him away place negativity in his mind about you and familiy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I was young - late teens and early twenties - and at the height of my physical beauty, I engaged in some promiscuity which included some one night stands. It wasn’t until years later that I understood the roots of this behavior, but at the time I didn’t see it as anything other than me experiencing my sexuality with men I found attractive in mutually fulfilling encounters.

One night I found myself in bed with a visiting professor of a local university who I had met and engaged in mutual seduction with at a local bar over billiards and drinks. We had not yet consummated the coupling when he let slip that he had a wife and kids back home in Canada. Despite his protestations, and I realize in retrospect that I was lucky he didn’t just force himself on me, I got out of bed got dressed and left. I told him as I was dressing that I could never knowingly be a participant in infidelity - that even if it wasn’t my promises at issue, I lived by a strong code that I owed respect to other peoples’ marriages. Of course the whole point of publication of wedding banns is to make known impediments to marriage, and the publication of wedding announcements is to inform the community of the status of certain persons. Rings are another, better public announcement of unavailability - which is of course why so many men don’t wear them. They blame the job or whatever - fine, take it off from 9-5 but put it on all other times - all kinds of excuses why that isn’t practical. I would never trust a husband who wouldn’t wear his ring willingly and enthusiastically.

I found myself tricked once or twice in my travels, and those experiences upset me to think about. I have no sympathy for single women or men who knowingly engage in affairs with married people - in particular if they know the married person is a parent. I think it requires a certain level of narcissism and sociopathy in a person’s psychological makeup to engage in such behavior, and some do it exclusively. It’s gross.

Precisely. This whole antisocial “I owe absolutely nothing to anyone else” attitude is quite literally sociopathic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

The OW in my world also was married and claimed at the get-go it would be no-strings. As time went on she started the pressure, started bringing up leaving her spouse and hinting for ex to do the same. I found that she monitored everything about me and my kids. When we were getting a new puppy she tried to talk my husband out of doing it because she saw that meant he was invested in the marriage still. If he had a family obligation she would try to belittle it which cause many fights at the end. She openly stated she was jealous of the wife. All from someone that claimed it would just be about sex. Yeah right. This Sumner woman saw Adams wife was pregnant again and the writing was on the wall that she wasn’t going to get him to leave the wife so she went scorched earth.

That's true but the core issue is that your exH was not monogamous. He was equally enjoying his family time AND his time with OW. I had a similar situation: my marriage to exH as very much alive, he seemed to be happy and never tried to discuss if anything bothered him. That beats me the most that he didn't even try to communicate what I was doing wrong, to give us a chance! Probably I wasn't doing anything wrong and marital therapy would have revealed his adultery with multiple women. Cheaters try to avoid couples therapy as anathema.

The OW controlled all aspects (creepy as I didn't even know what was causing our conflicts): she would throw a tantrum when learning my exH took me for a romantic trip to Caribbean; brainwashed him that I am too crazy about our child being a competitive athlete. ExH would have to devote a lot of time driving son to practices and it wasn't in HER interests to keep father involved in family too much. She was also married but her own kids were grown up college students.

I felt so sick when this double life was discovered (it lasted for 8 years before our son found out!). I realized that my exH made so many harmful for family's well-being decisions because of that "side influence".

This is heart breaking to read. So sorry. And, yet, that OW would be one on this site swearing she didn't cause any harm to you because she never was going to break up a marriage/family...all the while doing the things you described and trying to steer him away place negativity in his mind about you and familiy.

I'm that OW you're referring to, and no I never acted like that at all. I truly did not want either of us to leave our marriages. Our affair was conducted only during business hours, with no bleedover into evenings or weekends. Far from tantruming when he did things for his wife, I actually coached him on how to do nice things for her. (No, not expecting a medal for that, just explaining that YOUR experience is not universal.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

What you did to another woman was AWFUL. You actually are going to argue that it was okay to f@ck another woman’s husband because you were just a f@ck buddy? You don’t think that would harm a wife? Are you really that completely dense?

She was not harmed in any way.

As an aside, you'd think she was a crappy person and parent if you knew her. So maybe getting cheated on was her karma? I don't believe in any of that junk, but aren't you all always prattling on about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

The OW in my world also was married and claimed at the get-go it would be no-strings. As time went on she started the pressure, started bringing up leaving her spouse and hinting for ex to do the same. I found that she monitored everything about me and my kids. When we were getting a new puppy she tried to talk my husband out of doing it because she saw that meant he was invested in the marriage still. If he had a family obligation she would try to belittle it which cause many fights at the end. She openly stated she was jealous of the wife. All from someone that claimed it would just be about sex. Yeah right. This Sumner woman saw Adams wife was pregnant again and the writing was on the wall that she wasn’t going to get him to leave the wife so she went scorched earth.

That's true but the core issue is that your exH was not monogamous. He was equally enjoying his family time AND his time with OW. I had a similar situation: my marriage to exH as very much alive, he seemed to be happy and never tried to discuss if anything bothered him. That beats me the most that he didn't even try to communicate what I was doing wrong, to give us a chance! Probably I wasn't doing anything wrong and marital therapy would have revealed his adultery with multiple women. Cheaters try to avoid couples therapy as anathema.

The OW controlled all aspects (creepy as I didn't even know what was causing our conflicts): she would throw a tantrum when learning my exH took me for a romantic trip to Caribbean; brainwashed him that I am too crazy about our child being a competitive athlete. ExH would have to devote a lot of time driving son to practices and it wasn't in HER interests to keep father involved in family too much. She was also married but her own kids were grown up college students.

I felt so sick when this double life was discovered (it lasted for 8 years before our son found out!). I realized that my exH made so many harmful for family's well-being decisions because of that "side influence".

This is heart breaking to read. So sorry. And, yet, that OW would be one on this site swearing she didn't cause any harm to you because she never was going to break up a marriage/family...all the while doing the things you described and trying to steer him away place negativity in his mind about you and familiy.

I'm that OW you're referring to, and no I never acted like that at all. I truly did not want either of us to leave our marriages. Our affair was conducted only during business hours, with no bleedover into evenings or weekends. Far from tantruming when he did things for his wife, I actually coached him on how to do nice things for her. (No, not expecting a medal for that, just explaining that YOUR experience is not universal.)

I hope you realize how downright sick and sociopathic that is. Disgusting. Plus, there WAS BLEEDOVER don't fool yourself. In order to carry out what he was doing he was an over-stressed, critical a-hole at home. Taking time with you during the work day meant longer hours and make-up work that directly bled into family time, not to mention the cost and the time spent meeting up. What you did is absolutely disgusting, like your some kind of saint making marriages better across the DMV. You are so delusional to think you are blameless and not hurting your own spouse/kids and his as well by taking part in what you were doing.

You need psychological help and an STI panel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

What you did to another woman was AWFUL. You actually are going to argue that it was okay to f@ck another woman’s husband because you were just a f@ck buddy? You don’t think that would harm a wife? Are you really that completely dense?

She was not harmed in any way.

As an aside, you'd think she was a crappy person and parent if you knew her. So maybe getting cheated on was her karma? I don't believe in any of that junk, but aren't you all always prattling on about it?

Did you personally know her? Doubtful. Likely only heard anything about her from the guy you were banging. And her parenting? What could you possibly know about her parenting? Discussions during your f*ck sessions? Get real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

What you did to another woman was AWFUL. You actually are going to argue that it was okay to f@ck another woman’s husband because you were just a f@ck buddy? You don’t think that would harm a wife? Are you really that completely dense?

She was not harmed in any way.

As an aside, you'd think she was a crappy person and parent if you knew her. So maybe getting cheated on was her karma? I don't believe in any of that junk, but aren't you all always prattling on about it?

Ha. This poster so perfectly encapsulates what the others said upstream, i.e., "Precisely. This whole antisocial “I owe absolutely nothing to anyone else” attitude is quite literally sociopathic."

So BDP/sociopathic its beyond words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

What you did to another woman was AWFUL. You actually are going to argue that it was okay to f@ck another woman’s husband because you were just a f@ck buddy? You don’t think that would harm a wife? Are you really that completely dense?

[/b]She was not harmed in any way. [b]

As an aside, you'd think she was a crappy person and parent if you knew her. So maybe getting cheated on was her karma? I don't believe in any of that junk, but aren't you all always prattling on about it?

Curious. Did she find out about you? If so, how could you possibly say she wasn't harmed in any way? Have you read about what betrayal in a marriage does to the betrayed? The type of psychological damage it inflicts for the rest of their life?

Are you still cheating on your husband? What number are you up to now? Why stay married? Can you not support yourself?