I agree, her whining does come off a bit that way. |
There is not a trace of whininess. It is a very common, resonant sentiment that women are made to feel shame about, thanks in large part to comments like these. Support and validate women. |
Blindly support and validate whatever even if ridiculous. Not sexist are you? You also hate males and sons, I see. |
They only feel shame if they are ashamed of what they did or said. |
Feeling a pang of wistfulness or longing over not having a daughter is most certainly not ridiculous. Please think critically and with nuance: Humans contain multitudes. You can love a son but also be curious about a daughter-mother relationship. Why are you responding in such angry absolutes? |
No PP. Posting about it and subsequently asking for suggestions is most ridiculous. |
You suggest that the OP didn’t open herself up to scrutiny with that post? |
Subsequently? It was all in the same post, and there were many helpful replies. You're incorrect. |
Scrutiny is one thing; nonsensical claims about man-hating falls into a very different realm. |
Well that’s the scrutiny she opened herself up to. |
So wait, if someone ever thinks about the what-ifs or wishes for anything to be different about their life, it means they hate their life? You should be a therapist! You’ve got it all figured out! |
Scrutiny isn't typically synonymous with name-calling and baseless hyperbole. |
Oh the grammar police on here. That’s your best argument? Correcting text? By the way yours is wrong. Nice try. Subsequently doesn’t mean she needed to have a follow up post. She said she was sad and down in the post at the end she subsequently asked for suggestions. |
No argument. Please be kind. No need to become so angry about a harmless, genuine post that resonates for many. |
You want to people to play in some sort of scrutiny definition role. I’m not the chief of it. Whatever semantics you want to call it, the OP opened herself up to it. |