Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a bot.

This guy is beyond weird and belongs in a mental institution.

OR, he's very lucid, very self aware and is a "Community Agitator" with specific aims abd goals.

You know all about community agitators, don't you?

Like Turning Point?

Debating ideas = Agitating?

Tuning point was never about debating ideas. Tuning point was about formatting violence. Read the post here. The Kirk supporters want to kill all the leftists. Who are ten leftists- AOC, Bernie, Schumer, etc. plus anyone in their movement who steps out of line.

I read comments like this on this site and have to chuckle a bit. I am not surprised to read this drivel here. I am not surprised that people who frequent this site really have no understanding of Turning Point or Charlie Kirk.

And, then, I look at the video footage from weekend vigils and services. I see tens of millions of people from all over the world - the US, the UK, Australia, South Korea, and others - celebrating the life of Charlie Kirk and honoring his memory. And, these tens of millions of people know that Charlie Kirk was working to encourage discourse - something the left finds threatening. He was a Christian who believed all people are God's children. That was evident from the manner he treated other people in his debates - not personal - he simply gave his opinons and ideas. He treated people of color, gays, trans people - everyone - with respect even though he may not agree with what they said or believed.

This is yet another issue where the left - especially on this site and the far left media people - are on the 20% side of an 80/20 issue. You are never going to convince anyone of your opinions when it comes to TP or Charlie Kirk because we have thousands of hours of video that show just the opposite. Trying to take his comments out of context or blatantly lying about what he has said falls on deaf ears around the world.

And, his movement will only grow. A fitting tribute to a person who was shot by someone that Charlie Kirk *would have* welcomed debate with, had he been given the chance.

View all of his clips, not the ones edited to make him look like a nice Christian boy. He was an IRL sh*tposter. Routinely spoke over people, said nasty things to get a rise. Debated college kids and only posted the videos were he “owned” his co-debater and not the ones where he got annihilated.

And that’s the thing about the internet- you can’t bury this stuff. Nothing nasty stays buried for long. History is always being rewritten.

Ok.

And?

The klan had millions of members at one time.

Judging by some of the posts here, people have no idea about the funding and motivations of organizations like TP. Yes, I’m sure that there are more ignorant people out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it particularly about White men that makes them go into these online communities? I’m not trying to start anything, I’m being genuine. There are plenty families of all races with internet and computer access so why in particular is it seemingly always White men?

Gee I don't know, does your local school or university have a club where white men can meet others like them? Is that allowed?

Yes, it’s called a fraternity. Or IT club. Any gamer club. Or pretty much any sport that requires big money like tennis, crew, fencing, lacrosse hockey, water polo, or swimming. I went to a diverse college and even with affinity groups out the wazoo it was very easy for a white male to partake in exclusively white male environments tailored to their specific interests. So easy in fact no one needed to make a special white male club.

You obviously went to college a very long time ago and are completely out of touch.

These clubs don’t exist anymore? Fraternities are gone? These sports don’t exist any more? In Utah?!

Give me a break.

Let us know the President of a fraternity is the next shooter. Or the captain of the football team. Weirdly, it's never them.

I think our definition / boundary of what a normal, healthy acceptable man is is very narrow, especially in Utah, but in the West generally. It's like they're stuck in the 1950s. And the shooters are often outcasts. It seems like, if boys or men don't fit into this little narrow lane of "normal" and "successful" there, especially if they are from a family like the shooter's (cop, Republican, gun oriented) they're thrown out like the trash.

I say that as a gay family member who was casually and cruelly "thrown out like the trash" by a Republican, Western "close" family. But I'm a woman, so I turned my anger inwards. I also have a lot of friends and other family who supported me.

Now, I have no idea whatsoever whether Tyler Robinson was gay or a leftie or an outcast, or whatever. But I can certainly tell you a little about religious right MAGA culture. I can tell you that it's not accepting or kind or encouraging of sensitive sweet boys or men.

I’m so sorry. I know of minors who were actually thrown out on the street by these families. So traumatic and you didn’t deserve any of it.

Right wingers remain the original “cancel culture”. I’m convinced God has extra special things in store for them for throwing out their own blood like yesterday’s garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Lance and Tyler were this flaming, furry bizarre counterculture couple, they would have left Utah.

+1 This is what I said as soon as Robinson was identified. If he were actually a lefty he would have take his great ACT score and 4.0 GPA and gone anywhere else. For free. Now people are trying to convince us that his one semester at Utah State of all places radicalized him. Come the f*** on.

Nice try, but this kid was irrational. Irrational people do not operate in rational ways.

Do you know Tyler Robinson personally? He was irrational? How do you know this?

Anyone who assassinates another human being for saying things you don't agree with is not a rational thinker.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

[Anonymous]

471 pages and the fact remains that the shooter was a gay leftist. Nothing will change that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a bot.

This guy is beyond weird and belongs in a mental institution.

OR, he's very lucid, very self aware and is a "Community Agitator" with specific aims abd goals.

You know all about community agitators, don't you?

Like Turning Point?

Debating ideas = Agitating?

Tuning point was never about debating ideas. Tuning point was about formatting violence. Read the post here. The Kirk supporters want to kill all the leftists. Who are ten leftists- AOC, Bernie, Schumer, etc. plus anyone in their movement who steps out of line.

I read comments like this on this site and have to chuckle a bit. I am not surprised to read this drivel here. I am not surprised that people who frequent this site really have no understanding of Turning Point or Charlie Kirk.

And, then, I look at the video footage from weekend vigils and services. I see tens of millions of people from all over the world - the US, the UK, Australia, South Korea, and others - celebrating the life of Charlie Kirk and honoring his memory. And, these tens of millions of people know that Charlie Kirk was working to encourage discourse - something the left finds threatening. He was a Christian who believed all people are God's children. That was evident from the manner he treated other people in his debates - not personal - he simply gave his opinons and ideas. He treated people of color, gays, trans people - everyone - with respect even though he may not agree with what they said or believed.

This is yet another issue where the left - especially on this site and the far left media people - are on the 20% side of an 80/20 issue. You are never going to convince anyone of your opinions when it comes to TP or Charlie Kirk because we have thousands of hours of video that show just the opposite. Trying to take his comments out of context or blatantly lying about what he has said falls on deaf ears around the world.

And, his movement will only grow. A fitting tribute to a person who was shot by someone that Charlie Kirk *would have* welcomed debate with, had he been given the chance.

View all of his clips, not the ones edited to make him look like a nice Christian boy. He was an IRL sh*tposter. Routinely spoke over people, said nasty things to get a rise. Debated college kids and only posted the videos were he “owned” his co-debater and not the ones where he got annihilated.

And that’s the thing about the internet- you can’t bury this stuff. Nothing nasty stays buried for long. History is always being rewritten.

Tens of thousands…lmao.

Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a bot.

This guy is beyond weird and belongs in a mental institution.

OR, he's very lucid, very self aware and is a "Community Agitator" with specific aims abd goals.

You know all about community agitators, don't you?

Like Turning Point?

Debating ideas = Agitating?

Tuning point was never about debating ideas. Tuning point was about formatting violence. Read the post here. The Kirk supporters want to kill all the leftists. Who are ten leftists- AOC, Bernie, Schumer, etc. plus anyone in their movement who steps out of line.

I read comments like this on this site and have to chuckle a bit. I am not surprised to read this drivel here. I am not surprised that people who frequent this site really have no understanding of Turning Point or Charlie Kirk.

And, then, I look at the video footage from weekend vigils and services. I see tens of millions of people from all over the world - the US, the UK, Australia, South Korea, and others - celebrating the life of Charlie Kirk and honoring his memory. And, these tens of millions of people know that Charlie Kirk was working to encourage discourse - something the left finds threatening. He was a Christian who believed all people are God's children. That was evident from the manner he treated other people in his debates - not personal - he simply gave his opinons and ideas. He treated people of color, gays, trans people - everyone - with respect even though he may not agree with what they said or believed.

This is yet another issue where the left - especially on this site and the far left media people - are on the 20% side of an 80/20 issue. You are never going to convince anyone of your opinions when it comes to TP or Charlie Kirk because we have thousands of hours of video that show just the opposite. Trying to take his comments out of context or blatantly lying about what he has said falls on deaf ears around the world.

And, his movement will only grow. A fitting tribute to a person who was shot by someone that Charlie Kirk *would have* welcomed debate with, had he been given the chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the guy was struggling with being gay. The Mormon church hates gay people. Conservatives are currently at war with the LGBTQ community. When you’re trying to come to terms with who you are, these external factors of pure unadulterated hatred sure don’t make it easy.

Kirk shouldn’t have been shot but it isn’t like he did much good in the world either.

There’s a pastor online who said how you die doesn’t redeem how you lived, I can abhor the violence that killed you without celebrating your life, and nowhere in the Bible does it say to celebrate evil. Agree with it all.

Then why are people idolizing Kirk? He demonized immigrants, the left, Muslims, Chinese, Blacks, Latinos, LGBTQ+, academia, public schools and universities, and so on, yet people are portraying him with AI to be some kind of angelic figure embraced by Christ. Hate and demonization are not what Christ taught. Anyone following such a fraudulent, hateful brand of "Christianity" has truly lost their way.

He’s become a martyr. Being a martyr is huge in Christianity. So right now we see Americans white washing Kirk’s opinions. They claim he just loved debating and free speech. Laughable. But this is life under the crazy Trump regime.

[Anonymous]

So now Reddit is the deep dark internet? Geez.

"Friends have confirmed that there was kind of that deep, dark internet, the Reddit culture, and these other dark places of the internet where this person was going deep.” as said by UT Gov, Cox

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

[Anonymous]

You all really believe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk? There’s not a shred of evidence. How old are you all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now Reddit is the deep dark internet? Geez.

"Friends have confirmed that there was kind of that deep, dark internet, the Reddit culture, and these other dark places of the internet where this person was going deep.” as said by UT Gov, Cox

Yeah, he's losing credibility by the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:471 pages and the fact remains that the shooter was a gay leftist. Nothing will change that.

The authorities don't seem very trustworthy, given how partisan they all are. We may learn more, but it won't be from Donald Trump, Kash Patel or Governor Cox, that's clear. Which is a big part of the problem. In the Trump era, you can't trust the MAGA government because they are extremely biased and not trying to rule for the benefit of all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

He could have worked independently, being paid by Kirk perhaps. His ‘trans roomate’ was a colleague.