Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Why did Kirk get shot?

[Anonymous]

This is Horrific. Violence isn’t the answer.

[Anonymous]

Oh man.

So what’s everyone having for dinner tonight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts and prayers. But to be fair, shall not be infringed. He was blessed to get to experience what those slaughtered elementary students felt, though. "Walk a mile in my shoes. Feel what I feel..." and all that.

Being shot and nearly killed only emboldened Steve Scalise. I suspect the same will happen with Charlie Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m really appalled at some of the reactions I saw on Bluesky.

Violence is not the answer (obviously), he didn’t deserve to be shot

, and this is only putting us at risk for some reichstag fire and escalation.

Honestly an insane take given the violence these people inflict on the rest of us on a daily basis in pursuit of their various grifts. May Charlie Kirk get exactly the outcome he deserves.

Do you hear yourself?

"Utah's firearm laws are some of the more permissive in the United States."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Utah

Maybe not a good idea?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts and prayers. But to be fair, shall not be infringed. He was blessed to get to experience what those slaughtered elementary students felt, though. "Walk a mile in my shoes. Feel what I feel..." and all that.

Being shot and nearly killed only emboldened Steve Scalise. I suspect the same will happen with Charlie Kirk.

And Donald Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is Horrific. Violence isn’t the answer.

It's not, but this is what the GOP and courts have enabled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you people making jokes realize that whoever did this has just made everything worse in terms of the slide toward fascism?

Fascism is here. We can fight it or not. The idea that we should meet the violence of fascism with non-violence is nonsensical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don’t you people making jokes realize that whoever did this has just made everything worse in terms of the slide toward fascism?

He was shot by a gun luvin', gun totin' person that the right loves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Horrific. Violence isn’t the answer.

It's not, but this is what the GOP and courts have enabled.

The man who shot Kirk is responsible.

Neither the GOP nor the courts shot Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights" - Charlie Kirk, 2023

This is f’ed up, but damn.

[Anonymous]

Someone posted the video. I think it’s unlikely he survived

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

graphic, up close video of shooting

It’s bad.

OMG that was horrible. I was not prepared to see that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shot *at*, not shot.

Pretty clear he was shot in the chest, almost center mass. It looked like it was directly at his heart.

Looked like his neck to me...but yes, very bad.

Reports are that he was shot in the neck.

He is a husband and father of two young children.
Those of you who are not condemning this horrendous act of violence and are seemingly celebrating - YOU are part of the problem with what’s wrong in our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Horrific. Violence isn’t the answer.

It's not, but this is what the GOP and courts have enabled.

The man who shot Kirk is responsible.

Neither the GOP nor the courts shot Kirk.

Of course the shooter was responsible...and enabled by the 2A.