Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it particularly about White men that makes them go into these online communities? I’m not trying to start anything, I’m being genuine. There are plenty families of all races with internet and computer access so why in particular is it seemingly always White men?

Let’s see. When other cultures/races do something wrong, the white people blame genetic inferiority, cultural rot, poor parenting, and not enough God. I’d think all of those things would be equally applicable here.

White parents are just not focused on raising their white boys to be anything other than entitled little POS. Their toxic “tough it up” mindset is producing a generation of fragile little psychopaths. And parking them in front of technology because you can’t stand them isn’t helping. Spend some time with your kids FFs. Go outside and touch some grass together.

- UMC White parent of a white boy

Black people are taught resilience from an early age. It is somewhat changing, but I grew up with depression and anxiety being dismissed because Black people have been through harder stuff and pushed through it. In hindsight that might be what has saved us from getting wrapped up in these mass shootings and hate groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

That he went on the top of a building and shot somebody? That's not ludicrous. That's something anyone in this country with guns available on every corner could do at any moment. It's eminently believeable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:471 pages and the fact remains that the shooter was a gay leftist. Nothing will change that.

Trust me, we are all laughing at you because you are SO DESPERATE.

Another ultra-right Groyper, wearing the same shirt as Tyler Robinson, vandalized a Charlie Kirk memorial. Nick Fuentes and the Groypers really did not like him.

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/charlie-kirk-memorial-turning-point-usa-hq-phoenix-destroyed-suspect-arrested

[Anonymous]

So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:471 pages and the fact remains that the shooter was a gay leftist. Nothing will change that.

We seem to know very little about the real truth right now.

[Anonymous]

Probably already posted, but worth posting again if not.

The pastor of the Alfred Street Baptist Church nailed it: https://www.instagram.com/p/DOmYt0QESKu/

[Anonymous]

[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

That he went on the top of a building and shot somebody? That's not ludicrous. That's something anyone in this country with guns available on every corner could do at any moment. It's eminently believeable.

He was framed. He was lured to the roof for whatever reason, thinking he was getting paid for hacking and discovering relevant information for Kirk. He could have received a gun as payment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

Someone else killed Charlie Kirk, not Tyler Robinson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

That he went on the top of a building and shot somebody? That's not ludicrous. That's something anyone in this country with guns available on every corner could do at any moment. It's eminently believeable.

He was framed. He was lured to the roof for whatever reason, thinking he was getting paid for hacking and discovering relevant information for Kirk. He could have received a gun as payment.

^^ a gun could have been left up there as payment perhaps, or nothing was up there. The goal was to get Tyler up onto the roof to make him look like he killed Charlie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So posters are suggesting that the CIA hired Robinson to be a hacker and also kill Kirk then left him to rot in jail? I thought cyber operations were out of a different agency but ok. Tell me more of this conspiracy.

Someone else killed Charlie Kirk, not Tyler Robinson.

What makes you think this?

[Anonymous]

People like Stephen King are getting caught in Kirk's deceit. He didn't say gays should be stoned. He said Biblical law requiring gays to be stoned was "God's perfect law." He didn't say it explicitly, but implicitly, and everyone understood his meaning, especially that he was being deceitful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

That he went on the top of a building and shot somebody? That's not ludicrous. That's something anyone in this country with guns available on every corner could do at any moment. It's eminently believeable.

He was framed. He was lured to the roof for whatever reason, thinking he was getting paid for hacking and discovering relevant information for Kirk. He could have received a gun as payment.

^^ a gun could have been left up there as payment perhaps, or nothing was up there. The goal was to get Tyler up onto the roof to make him look like he killed Charlie.

If he wasn't going up there to kill Charlie Kirk, why was he trying so hard not to touch the railing in the security video?

I hear that it's hard to accept that someone you identify with for whatever reason was a murderer, but in this case it seems likely that he is. Especially since he confessed and his father turned him in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all really believe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk? There’s not a shred of evidence. How old are you all?

TV says it so it must be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler gives dorky hacker vibes, someone very book smart, brilliant with tech, but lacks some common sense.

The worst kind of kid to have a conservative, authoritarian meathead for a Dad.

His LE dad may have helped him gain access to a job with the CIA.

His dad was NOT in law enforcement. More misinformation

None of this matters. Tyler was probably a self taught software developer/engineer basically. He was recruited by an intelligence agency. He was hacking into domestic and foreign governments and possibly being paid by Kirk.

Okay. Don't feed the trolls. I know. But what evidence do you have that he was CIA or intelligence? He genuinely does not fit the profile. A hacker, maybe. I mean, you don't need to be hired by anyone to do that. But your constant posts are getting annoying. Are you a groyper trying to sow confusion?

Honestly, if you were to just make up the most cockamamie fictional story about this, you couldn't do any better.

If this person was CIA or intelligence, why would he share information with a roommate? Why would he have a roommate at all? If he were being paid by a major intelligence agency he would have enough money to have his own apartment.

Why would he have a homemade sniper gun made out of a hunting rifle? Why would he drop it in the woods? Neither of those fit with your intelligence agency conspiracy theory. So, could you show some evidence or just drop it?

I mean, the alternative that we are supposed to believe is ludicrous.

That he went on the top of a building and shot somebody? That's not ludicrous. That's something anyone in this country with guns available on every corner could do at any moment. It's eminently believeable.

He was framed. He was lured to the roof for whatever reason, thinking he was getting paid for hacking and discovering relevant information for Kirk. He could have received a gun as payment.

^^ a gun could have been left up there as payment perhaps, or nothing was up there. The goal was to get Tyler up onto the roof to make him look like he killed Charlie.

If he wasn't going up there to kill Charlie Kirk, why was he trying so hard not to touch the railing in the security video?

I hear that it's hard to accept that someone you identify with for whatever reason was a murderer, but in this case it seems likely that he is. Especially since he confessed and his father turned him in.

Maybe he has OCD, who knows or cares? He confessed because his photo was the only person of interest out there. He had to turn himself in, he is the only suspect. There’s no evidence though that he shot anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Lance and Tyler were this flaming, furry bizarre counterculture couple, they would have left Utah.

+1 This is what I said as soon as Robinson was identified. If he were actually a lefty he would have take his great ACT score and 4.0 GPA and gone anywhere else. For free. Now people are trying to convince us that his one semester at Utah State of all places radicalized him. Come the f*** on.

The shooter went to USU for one semester 3 years ago. He wasn't there long enough to get "indoctrinated" (ie educated and exposed to people of different backgrounds and cultures)