+1 |
+2….thanks for clarifying |
+3 Well put. Thank you. |
|
It infuriates me when people get married when their kid is a tween and don't think AT ALL about financial aid for college if they don't intend to pay. I totally get that things happen sometimes. But this just sounds like a scenario where it never occurred to OP that her getting married had MASSIVE ramifications for her daughter's financial aid eligibility AND she never had any plan for addressing those ramifications (and now seems completely unwilling to).
The bare MINIMUM that you should do is ask your husband to loan your daughter the necessary $$ at no profit to himself. Even then, there's a decent chance she's worse of than she would have been if she gets into an elite school (which offer lots of grants as opposed to loans), but at least she's not completely screwed. OP: If you aren't willing to even ask your husband to loan your daughter the money, I sincerely hope she leaves for college and never looks back. |
| I sincerely hope OP was just trolling. Even dung beetles wouldn’t treat their kids like this. |
| OP, if you’re still reading this, and I’m not reading 34 pages— have you thought about your daughter getting legally emancipated? |
It’s not just his money. She is living in the house with them, or did for some time, as a second-class citizen. Can’t you see that? And because of your marriage, she is not going to get the need-based aid she would otherwise get. The same thing happened for me - my mother couldn’t afford to pay for my college and my step-father’s income prevented me from qualifying for need-based aid. So it was either I go to UMD and only drown a little in debt, or go to a fancy school and really drown. I went to UMD. Definitely was not my best fit, but I had no better option. |
Tell her you got married and didn’t think, and now don’t care, that your decision affects her deeply. |
But those other kids can qualify for need-based aid that OP’s daughter is ineligible for as a result of her mother’s marriage. And the daughter is treated like an after-thought while be long surrounded by wealth. |
No. Because she isn’t going to marry him and jeopardize his daughters’ ability to qualify for need-based aid. |
1) No one is saying the new husband should foot the bill. Everyone is pointing out that the marriages prevents the daughter from receiving certain types of aid that would otherwise be available to people in the daughter’s financial situation. 2) Your scenario involves someone outside of the relationship (an ex-spouse) trying to control finances of which she is not a part. Surely you can see the difference. Right? |
| Did op ever explain what she spends her money on? |
Agree. If you agree to marriage you agree to FULLY open up your finances as well as your heart, no matter how old the children involved are. If you have no assets prior to marriage then your new spouse should be willing to spend the same amount on your child as they do their own. That includes college education, material things like cars, down payments for homes, other financial gifts etc. If they balk at this then it is obvious they are selfish and don't care what happens to your child nor you. If your spouse has millions in the bank then your children (including adult children) should inherit the same amount from your estate as their biological children do. It's only fair. |
Agree. If you agree to marriage you agree to FULLY open up your finances as well as your heart, no matter how old the children involved are. If you have no assets prior to marriage then your new spouse should be willing to spend the same amount on your child as they do their own. That includes college education, material things like cars, down payments for homes, other financial gifts etc. If they balk at this then it is obvious they are selfish and don't care what happens to your child nor you. If your spouse has millions in the bank then your children (including adult children) should inherit the same amount from THEIR estate as their biological children do. It's only fair. |
What would this do? |