Don't see how I'm being possessive. |
On the one side: As someone who has worked in this advocacy field, I would say that many sex workers are coerced. There is a documentary called "Hot Girls Wanted" that details the experiences of several webcam girls. Even the ones who are excited about what they're doing are being used. It's entirely possible that your friend's girlfriend has left that life behind and is trying to start over. Your telling her boyfriend about this may do lasting damage, cause her to go back to her previous life, etc. On the other side: I know a few people who have worked as strippers who are not ashamed of this work. They don't feel that it makes them bad people or people who can't engage in relationships normally. One of them is also an elementary school teacher. The number of people I know who were exotic dancers while in law school or medical school would probably surprise you. If you truly think that it's important, I would suggest that you talk to HER and see what the story is. Perhaps your friend already knows. |
|
I don't really have an opinion one way or another on whether any particular person should think sex work is okay. I think that's a personal thing between the two people in the couple. I don't think that the OP's friend has a "right" to know about this anymore than he has a "right" to know about anything else his girlfriend has done in the past. The OP, however, is inserting herself into a relationship she's not part of. It's not her relationship. She's oddly possessive of this friend. Don't see how I'm being possessive. You're not, and I'd wager that PP's answer would be totally different if it were an issue that s/he cared about. Once again, s/he's projecting her worldview about sex workers (ambivalence) onto your LO. If it were an issue that PP personally found troubling/offensive (LO's partner had a virulently racist past for example), PP's attitude towards disclosure would likely be very different. Bottom line: You have information that LO does not, and it's reasonable to believe that LO would like to know this information. Therefore, you tell LO and let LO make his own decision. |
You're not, and I'd wager that PP's answer would be totally different if it were an issue that s/he cared about. Once again, s/he's projecting her worldview about sex workers (ambivalence) onto your LO. If it were an issue that PP personally found troubling/offensive (LO's partner had a virulently racist past for example), PP's attitude towards disclosure would likely be very different. Bottom line: You have information that LO does not, and it's reasonable to believe that LO would like to know this information. Therefore, you tell LO and let LO make his own decision. |
Hmm now I'm a little torn SO has made a big deal about how great my LO is. I thought it was part of their game, but if it turns out SO is trying to turn life around and was coerced I'd feel a little bad about it, but I still feel like my Lo should know either way. Maybe the best thing to do is to speak to the SO? |
| Tell. Not only a health issue but a horrible character flaw. |
+1. Her first priority is the best interest of her loved one, not the privacy rights of a virtual stranger. She absolutely has a right to tell her loved one. |
|
I think it matters a lot specifically what the evidence is and HOW you found it. Did you go searching for it? The answers to these questions could greatly affect how your LO receives the information. |
So now the idea is that you should go behind the back of your LO to talk to his SO about her past and their relationship in order to protect her? That's truly insane. What are you going to do--evaluate her statement of her past and decide if it's satisfactory to you and, if so, refrain from telling your LO? Your obligation--your sole obligation--is to your LO. If HE wants to talk to SO and she wants to explain it to HIM, that's their prerogative. Doing otherwise would truly be sticking your nose into their business. As for the PP who's done advocacy, it is not OP's place to withhold information from a LO to (hypothetically) protect a third party. That's a decision that LO should be free to make for himself, not be made for him. |
|
No.
MYOB |
PP here. It's not the OP's place to interfere in other people's relationships in the first place! I think she should let it go all together. I was simply pointing out that her belief about the SO's history might not be as it seems. Many sex workers are abused, and it's not ridiculous to consider the consequences of one's actions, even if the actions are justified. If I found out that my brother's girlfriend had been a webcam girl in the past, I would be concerned, but my brother is an adult. It's not my job to vet his girlfriends. |
Lets say the SO was recognized by person(s) I trust and I followed up on their hunches. I'm not trying to use this info as a "gotcha moment". Though I've had my concerns about this relationship from the start, I did not go digging for dirt. |
I don't know. I think maybe it is best to stay out of this one. Maybe your LO does not want to know about his or her past. It is really between the two of them to discuss that. Originally I said that you should tell but now I am kind of thinking this could be a tragic story and you might really have a negative impact on this relationship. It is not your place to determine if they should be together or not. People lie about their sexual pasts all the time. Most women do not give accurate partner counts to their SO. Some men also do not share the whole truth. It just isn't for you to decide. I also feel like you have your own reasons for wanting this relationship to end but maybe your LO is really happy. |
| I'll put my $20 on you tell them, they already know, and it ruins your relationship. It'll serve you right too. |
| Anonymouslynyrd send the pen video SO is in to your LO. |