Braddock School board member

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If DCUM supports Alexa that’s probably a good indication that she’s going to lose.

No, she’s the anointed replacement for Rachna just like Walkinshaw was the anointed replacement for Connolly in Congress. The FCDC activists want her and she’ll win.

Yup, that’s how the (un)Democratic party operates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rachna has endorsed Tom Dannan.

If this is true, I am not sure why PPs are claiming the other candidate is anointed by FCDC.

[Anonymous]

I'll take the smart device over the yogurt.

[Anonymous]

Have to admit I got this wrong.

Tom Dannen has endorsements from a majority of the School Board, including the people who deserve the least respect: Sandy Anderson, Seema Dixit, Karl Frisch, Robyn Lady, Kyle McDaniel, Marcia St. John-Cunning, and Rachna Sizemore-Heizer. It's basically the rogue's gallery of the most anti-family people on the current board.

Alexa Krezel, on the other hand, has the endorsements of Ricardy Anderson, Mateo Dunne, and Ryan McElveen, as well as former Braddock representative Megan McLaughlin. So this includes some people who actually ask questions and pay attention.

Dannen sounds like Kyle McDaniel 2.0, and McDaniel basically turned into Laura Jane Cohen 2.0. Yuck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have to admit I got this wrong.

Tom Dannen has endorsements from a majority of the School Board, including the people who deserve the least respect: Sandy Anderson, Seema Dixit, Karl Frisch, Robyn Lady, Kyle McDaniel, Marcia St. John-Cunning, and Rachna Sizemore-Heizer. It's basically the rogue's gallery of the most anti-family people on the current board.

Alexa Krezel, on the other hand, has the endorsements of Ricardy Anderson, Mateo Dunne, and Ryan McElveen, as well as former Braddock representative Megan McLaughlin. So this includes some people who actually ask questions and pay attention.

Dannen sounds like Kyle McDaniel 2.0, and McDaniel basically turned into Laura Jane Cohen 2.0. Yuck.

That first group is a who’s who of the SB loser parade so that guy will probably win - if that district voted in Rachna they will definitely vote for him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rachna has endorsed Tom Dannan.

If this is true, I am not sure why PPs are claiming the other candidate is anointed by FCDC.

That is because those PPs are idiots who don't know what is going on.
Tom Dannan has been endorsed by the majority of the School Board. He is a former PTA president.
Alexa Krezel has been volunteering on advisory committees for over 14 years and is endorsed by others.
Both are active parents and good people.

[Anonymous]

Krezel is pro casino and is backed by the pro casino crowd. Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Krezel is pro casino and is backed by the pro casino crowd. Yikes.

That’s not a School Board issue. What’s your evidence other than an endorsement from Dave Marsden? Never heard Ricardy Anderson or Ryan McElveen say they support a casino and they’ve endorsed Krezel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rachna has endorsed Tom Dannan.

If this is true, I am not sure why PPs are claiming the other candidate is anointed by FCDC.

That is because those PPs are idiots who don't know what is going on.
Tom Dannan has been endorsed by the majority of the School Board. He is a former PTA president.
Alexa Krezel has been volunteering on advisory committees for over 14 years and is endorsed by others.
Both are active parents and good people.

Unfortunately the majority on the SB endorsing Dannan consist of those most responsible for running FCPS into the ground. If you want another Sandy Anderson or Karl Frisch on the SB go for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Krezel is pro casino and is backed by the pro casino crowd. Yikes.

That’s not a School Board issue. What’s your evidence other than an endorsement from Dave Marsden? Never heard Ricardy Anderson or Ryan McElveen say they support a casino and they’ve endorsed Krezel.

Marsden, Pekarsky, and Dunne all backed the casino. Especially Pekarsky. Nice try. Krezel needs to immediately come out against the terrible casino idea and put the issue to bed. Otherwise her intimate association with and backing from the pro casino movement speaks for itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Krezel is pro casino and is backed by the pro casino crowd. Yikes.

That’s not a School Board issue. What’s your evidence other than an endorsement from Dave Marsden? Never heard Ricardy Anderson or Ryan McElveen say they support a casino and they’ve endorsed Krezel.

Marsden, Pekarsky, and Dunne all backed the casino. Especially Pekarsky. Nice try. Krezel needs to immediately come out against the terrible casino idea and put the issue to bed. Otherwise her intimate association with and backing from the pro casino movement speaks for itself.

What a load of BS. Exactly what you’d expect from the likes of Karl Frisch and Sandy Anderson.

Krezel now has the endorsements of Ricardy Andersen, Mateo Dunne, Melanie Meren, Ilryong Moon, and Ryan McElveen - in other words, all the School Board members who occasionally ask tough questions.

Dannen has the endorsements of the political hacks like Frisch, Sandy Anderson, McDaniel, and Lady - the folks who never put in the work before they sought office and have brought nothing to the table and consistently fail to look after the needs of their constituents.

It has nothing to do with a casino and everything to do with which candidate might actually hold Reid and Gatehouse accountable.

Krezel should be an easy choice in Braddock.

[Anonymous]

Who cares where they stand on casinos? Let’s hear where they stand on the boundary review. Do they want to do this every five years? Do they agree with not providing transportation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares where they stand on casinos? Let’s hear where they stand on the boundary review. Do they want to do this every five years? Do they agree with not providing transportation?

No one cares about the boundary review. Move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares where they stand on casinos? Let’s hear where they stand on the boundary review. Do they want to do this every five years? Do they agree with not providing transportation?

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares where they stand on casinos? Let’s hear where they stand on the boundary review. Do they want to do this every five years? Do they agree with not providing transportation?

+1