This. You just have to decide that your peace and calm is more important than their temper tantrum. And you are not shutting them out, you are offering very reasonable alternatives. If they don't want to accept them, that is on them. |
| Oh wow, op. If my parents or ILs poles this sh*t they would loose ALL christmases with our family. |
Really? I'd always ask for parents' OK to buy any significant gift for their kid. |
|
So normally my suggestion would be just no…but you’ve caved before when they escalate and they have booked tickets without telling you in the past. I’d suggest lying and telling them you are all going on a vacation instead, already booked no debate and just laugh if they ask you to send anything in writing. Be clear that if they show up on their own, no one will be home. You can even book a hotel room ..just make sure it has a no penalty cancellation.
You don’t have to craft an elaborate lie about the vacation. Just say one of you got sick or a work emergency came up and you cancelled last minute. Do this at the very last minute so they don’t hop on the next plane. Hopefully be clearly not being available they will make other plans, maybe visit one of their other kids or settle in to staying home. Afterwards you and your husband can decide what you want to do. You can alternate or decide no hosting during Christmas. You’ve broken the cycle and it’s easier to then be firm on no. |
You are definitely not nasty, OP. But your DH has definitely given way too much control to his parents. Time for the two of you to align on what works for your family and stick with it. Your ILs have learned that a no from your DH is not really a no. They might put up a fuss at first but if you hold tight to your plans, they will get over it and learn how to make plans that work for everyone vs their way being the only way. |
Why would you want your kids to have a relationship with people like this? I'd cut them out. |
Just be aware that people like this will blame you and try to drive a wedge between your husband and yourself if you do this. |
Actually I didn’t answer. Do you have reading comprehension issues? |
It's a good plan to *generally* move toward visiting them just after Christmas. One recommendation I have is to not lock yourselves into a "we will always do it this way" framework given the rigidity it sounds like your inlaws bring to these discussions. Kids get older, jobs and schedules change, and what works now might now work in a few years. |
| I'd have them come the 24th-26th. Plus have your parents and anyone else you wished included in those days as well. If you want to go see lights or whatever on those days, go do it. They can join in or not. |
| My brother's in laws are like this, they need to be with him, his wife and their kids on Christmas and Christmas Eve. Either suck it up and stop complaining and prepare to spend every Christmas with them or draw a line in the sand. You're not children anymore. They aren't going to like it but everyone will adjust. |
This is a really good point, thank you. This has all been super helpful. One thing I should likely make clear is that we have stood by our "nos" that I alluded to in my first post--it just doesn't seem to change behavior on their end after the temper tantrums that occur after the "no" is delivered. (We did, admittedly, screw up by not making the deal we should have after they booked tickets on their own.) I was looking for alternative ideas for approaching, which I've definitely gotten here so thanks again! I also appreciate the folks who wonder why we'd tolerate such behavior more generally; the truth is that we just haven't hit the point of "cutting of ties" from our personal vantage point and hope to avoid that. We both know when it comes down to it, the ball is in their court but want to give as many options as possible to them that we could also live with. |
DP. That is exactly why the DH, and not OP/DIL, should handle all communications with his parents about any holiday plans (or no holiday plans). Every time. And he should be sure to tell them clearly, repeatedly if necessary, "This is both me and DW saying this." |
OP seems already to have made some decisions but I'm a DP and addressing the post above, generally: Just--no. People should not lie like PP is advocating. It just has SO much potential for creating far worse problems if, maybe when, the in-laws discover there was no trip booked and everyone was at home or close to home. Don't invent a trip, work emergency, illness, blah blah. Say the no, let them tantrum out of your hearing (because you're no longer on that phone call -- deliver the no and get out of the conversation). PP, you seem to imply that because OP and DH set a precedent by caving to the in-laws previously, they now should reset expectations by breaking the visit pattern with a lie. Yes, it's time to break the pattern, but lying is a terrible way to do it. They will have to keep perpetuating the lie and it won't be a one-and-done thing. They'll be grilled: "Susie said she was sick! How is she? We could come take care of her and give you a break!" "If your boss wants you to work over the holiday week, that is just awful and we're so concerned and have you thought of changing jobs!" Worst of all: "We heard from Bob's cousin's nephew that he SAW you at the Christmas festival in your town but you said you'd be in [Wherever]!" Just not worth it. Lies beget more lies, and liars get caught. Functioning adults should not lie just to keep peace with manipulative people. No one should twist themselves into a pretzel to create an easy, soft letdown for people who demand things of them and pull stunts like booking tickets without consultation. |
| When our kids were younger we started the tradition of celebrating our own Christmas the Saturday before the 25th. We loved having the day all to ourselves and the kids loved having an extra Christmas. Since we had that day to exactly what we wanted, when we wanted we were much more relaxed about what we did with extended family on the actual day. |