Because he’s dating a younger woman with no agency, duh. |
See? She gets the grift. |
They a very pretty. Totally. And the personalities! |
You are very full of yourself. |
|
It has to be mainly women answering on this thread to think that a guy in his 40s with a 25 year old girlfriend is dating her because he fears that older women will see what a loser he is.
Ha! He is dating a 25 year old to shag a 25 year old. |
|
* It is statistically improbable that a majority of or all of “gathering” of women in their early to mid 30s were “stunning”.
* It is statistically improbable that your daughter’s friendship group consists of women where a majority of or all of them are “stunning”. * It is statistically improbable that any group of women where a majority holds two degrees that many of them are “stunning”. * It is statistically improbable that a group of women that are “stunning” will find women within the group that are long term single. * without knowing the “successful” profession(s) in which these women find themselves in, it is unlikely (though possible) that these women are “stunning”. * It is statistically improbable that a group of women who are “stunning find themselves paired off with chumps. I believe you that the men that they were paired with were less masculine. Especially given that from what you have told us, this group of women is very likely left-leaning politically. People aren’t dating across political lines any more and I suspect that the guys you would find to be more conventionally masculine are on the other side of the political aisle. |
Uh, oh, OP. Time to backtrack a bit. |
Certainly improbable for median American women, but not improbable for: Upper middle class to wealthy upbringings, high school student-athletes, selective sorority sisters, college educated, advanced degrees, spin yoga pilates runners, reside in a healthy city, good jobs, healthy eaters, low or no cigarette drug and alcohol use. |
| Maybe the homely duds are legends in the sack and all your DD’s friends are using them for sex |
Np. Even among these cohorts, by age 30-35, the women in this area look old. Aging is normal and shouldn't affect how others perceive their beauty, but we all know it does, and women are even more so affected by this bias. |
You could be right, but as a mid-40s divorced dad, when I was first single I dated women in their 30s until three times in a row they wanted kids right away. That's when I updated my online dating settings to include 20s. Has nothing to do with thinking I hung the moon. |
So you could use a woman longer? This makes no sense. Society going downhill right from this post. All about what I can get out from a person short term. |
|
I’ve seen this in Europe.
My theory: women who are successful think highly of themselves whereas they don’t have a nice personality, they are demanding so the guys just go with younger/more agreeable even if less loaded. Money and success in a partner is not as important when you yourself are all that (I am talking about men). Also yes they waited too long. I am a woman fwiw |
But they aren't all that. They are homely men who don't make much money. |
|
8:27 again. I'm referring to the men OP is mentioning. They are not making much money or terribly bright or interesting or good looking.
I guess you are saying the good-looking high achieving men are dating women much younger than them and the higher standard women are dating the homely men because the good-looking high-status men don't want them. In my area there are many high achieving couples where both people work and do a lot with the community. I know of one man who divorced a decent but not outrageously beautiful woman and married a beautiful woman half his age which came across as him trading up. However, the new kids are cute but have mental defects. The kids of the first wife are grown and successful. |