10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.

+1

Vote blue. Donate blue.
Anonymous
I think any raped child should be able to get an abortion. So the details of this particular case don’t interest me all that much. Do right wingers think that if they can disprove or minimize the details of this one case, the problem of girls impregnated by rape goes away?

What kind of monster finds this to be a tough moral question. Of course a child shouldn’t be forced to gestate her rapist’s fetus.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.

Looks like you MAGAs made the wrong a$$umption.


Catch up. MAGA is over. Let’s call BS when we see it - which is you people manipulating every race, creed, color and sex to score political points.


What the f are you talking about? A child was raped. That is not a blue or red issue. Unfortunately it happens far far too often in all types of communities. Yes we should go after the rapist. But we should also do whatever we can to ease the pain of the victim - which includes access to an abortion and not shaming her for accessing an abortion. What that has to do with race, color or whatever is completely deranged.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think any raped child should be able to get an abortion. So the details of this particular case don’t interest me all that much. Do right wingers think that if they can disprove or minimize the details of this one case, the problem of girls impregnated by rape goes away?

What kind of monster finds this to be a tough moral question. Of course a child shouldn’t be forced to gestate her rapist’s fetus.

Read back a few pages for some links to people who think every product of child rape should be considered a blessing, how they definitely invited the rape (a thought so egregious there aren’t enough vomit emojis).

And this is how the whole forced birther movement thinks. Not a one of the cads on this thread who doubted this TRUE story has come back to apologize and say they’re going to think their decisions or beliefs over. Not a one of them has said that obviously a child should be able to get an abortion, because that’s a slippery slope in terms of what a “child” is. They’re too busy pretending to be mad that we’re not showing sufficient anger at the rapist (even though it’s their party that doesn’t take rape seriously) and pretending to be mad about HIPAA (or “HIPPA” or “HIPPO” or whatever the mouth breathers think it’s called).

This is the forced birther movement. It doesn’t matter who gets hurt so long as sluts get punished.
Anonymous
“It doesn’t matter who gets hurt so long as sluts get punished.”

This really encapsulates the whole thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.


DP.

JFC, no, there were verifiable facts, but they were not accessible to you or any random reporter.

And this is happening ALL THE TIME anyway. Deal with it yourself -- the little girls already have to, and people like you make it worse. Stop that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?

The rape was reported to the police in Ohio a week before by the doctor in Ohio. Why is the Attorney General of Indiana complaining about the doctor in Indiana not reporting the rape?


DP

It's weird, right? You report to the CPS entity that has jurisdiction, not every surrounding county's CPS (much less in multiple states).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?

The rape was reported to the police in Ohio a week before by the doctor in Ohio. Why is the Attorney General of Indiana complaining about the doctor in Indiana not reporting the rape?


DP

It's weird, right? You report to the CPS entity that has jurisdiction, not every surrounding county's CPS (much less in multiple states).


There is no valid basis for this investigation. It’s a naked attempt to threaten and intimidate medical providers into not speaking up about these cases so republicans can pretend then don’t happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.

And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.

And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.


Yep. Sounds like a pretty convincing way to discourage doctors talking about those inconvenient cases that illustrate how sh!tty the forced birther arguments are.

If nobody talks about the inconvenient horrible cases, they don't exist.
If they do talk about them, then obviously they shouldn't and must be effectively punished.

Damn. It's almost like they want to pretend those cases don't actually happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.

And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.


Yep. Sounds like a pretty convincing way to discourage doctors talking about those inconvenient cases that illustrate how sh!tty the forced birther arguments are.

If nobody talks about the inconvenient horrible cases, they don't exist.
If they do talk about them, then obviously they shouldn't and must be effectively punished.

Damn. It's almost like they want to pretend those cases don't actually happen.


It’s more like they don’t care about the child’s suffering. In their view, a young minor is less likely to be drug addicted and therefore more likely to produce a healthy, adoptable infant. Therefore, they view pregnant children as a net positive for society.
Anonymous
Todd Rokita is a sociopath. He absolutely doesn’t care about the girl’s suffering.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.

And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.


Yep. Sounds like a pretty convincing way to discourage doctors talking about those inconvenient cases that illustrate how sh!tty the forced birther arguments are.

If nobody talks about the inconvenient horrible cases, they don't exist.
If they do talk about them, then obviously they shouldn't and must be effectively punished.

Damn. It's almost like they want to pretend those cases don't actually happen.


It’s more like they don’t care about the child’s suffering. In their view, a young minor is less likely to be drug addicted and therefore more likely to produce a healthy, adoptable infant. Therefore, they view pregnant children as a net positive for society.


Never forget: "a domestic supply of infants."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.


But if you can't confirm because of privacy matters, that is not justification to imply that it isn't true. He could have waited until the allegation was investigated by law enforcement. Do you think they arrested the rapist without confirming that the girl really had been raped and impregnated by someone? Do you think that if no one is arrested, that proves that there was no rape?
Anonymous
Forced birthers are despicable, evil, pro-child-rape people. They are already targeting the doctor.

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: