10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Well, that settles that. I look forward to all of the mea culpas that will never actually come from those on the right who attacked the doctor for the telling the truth about this case so they could deny their own depravity.


I thought the story was fishy and I dont feel sorry for thinking that. In this era, its smart to be on guard for disinformation and wait for receipts. The Ohio DA, an authoritative source, disputed the veracity. People can and should take highly emotional, political stories with a grain of salt until the facts are verified.

“authoritative source”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?


Well, some health care personnel decide to take the most conservative line to avoid scrutiny and stay above laws that aren't clearly written. Some health care personnel are themselves conservative and gladly rely on laws that aren't all that clearly written to justify their extremism.

This is what happens when you legislate health care based on moral beliefs that not everyone shares. This will ALWAYS happen when you legislate health care based on moral beliefs that not every one shares.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?

ThEsE sPeCiAl CaSeS aRe ExEmPt - every drooling forced birther on here

Hey morons: when you hate women, your hatred squelches onto every female.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.

Looks like you MAGAs made the wrong a$$umption.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?

The rape was reported to the police in Ohio a week before by the doctor in Ohio. Why is the Attorney General of Indiana complaining about the doctor in Indiana not reporting the rape?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.

Looks like you MAGAs made the wrong a$$umption.


Well, you'd certainly know all about wrong assumptions.
Anonymous
I feel so bad for this poor girl. She and her family and her doctor are going to get attacked by forced birthers. Ugh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.

Looks like you MAGAs made the wrong a$$umption.


+1
Only people who are seriously stupid would jump to the conclusion that a respected doctor was making up this story.
Arrest made in rape of Ohio girl that led to Indiana abortion drawing international attention

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gerson Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.


The source of the story wasn't some random person. It was a practicing physician and Indiana U Medical School professor who went on the record and wouldn't lie about such a thing because she knew it was reportable. Kessler jumped on this because it gave him a chance to be on the right-wingers' side - something he rarely gets to do since they're the ones who usually lie. He and everyone else should apologize to the doctor for calling her a liar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder why the Ohio doctor wouldn’t go ahead and do it?

The rape was reported to the police in Ohio a week before by the doctor in Ohio. Why is the Attorney General of Indiana complaining about the doctor in Indiana not reporting the rape?


Because Todd Rokita of Indiana is an odious, opportunistic piece of shit always looking for a newer and better government job.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Even Kessler is being kind of a d|ck about this.


How is being a d!ck? He did his due diligence and he's correct. Too bad all journalists don't get ALL the facts before rushing to judgment.

No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.


No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.


By this logic, a rape never happened unless there is arrest. Is that what you intend to say to the vast majority of rape victims who get no justice--that their story is bllsht unless ther rapist has been arrested?

There have been many, many disgusting things to slog through since 2016, but the lengths to which people have gone to defend the hideously indefensible hellscape of what happened to this poor child is a new low. I just can't process that we have so many depraved fcks walking among us who think they are GREAT GOD-FEARING PEOPLE engaged in an epic struggle to protect the unborn. Replusive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.



Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.


No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.


Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: