Sounds great as an academic exercise. We are talking about the overwhelming majority. It’s eating garbage and not moving enough. That’s it. If you want to spend hours noodling about narrow population segments and rare conditions, go ahead. It’s meaningless in the grand scheme of the question presented. |
Yeah the lying BS DOES NEED TO STOP. Stop lying that you care you care about anybody fat. You don’t. PP was right. You don’t like fat people, obese people, overweight people, plus sized, people and any body that wants you to stop judging their physical appearance. So stop lying and stop with the BS with your fake “when I was obese...” NO fat person is lying to themselves, they know exactly who they are. And you did too “when you were obese”. |
That’s my point! The people who were predisposed to have a body that did not fare well with a low fat (and the relatively high carbs that went with it) diet is not a narrow population, at all. You can just take the loss and admit that “being overweight leads to metabolic disorder” is not remotely accurate, and if you want to claim that “being overweight leads to type 2 diabetes specifically,” we could still probably have a scientific debate about it. Think of your skinny, healthy, marathon running friends who developed gestational diabetes and now have a greater chance of developing type 2 diabetes. That’s a thing. Lots of skinny and people with just a few extra pounds are roaming around with pre-diabetes, too. It’s not the weight. Going back to the post I wrote to which you’re replying: basically we broke people’s bodies. Simply carbohydrates are simply not healthy for some people (they’re not healthy for anyone, really, but lots of people’s bodies can deal with them, no problem) and we were told, as a population, that there was no problem with it. |
Would you do me a solid? Would you read “Why We Get Fat”? Would you? It will really help you understand this, rather than you insulting me. |
PP, I would just give up. You are fighting the good fight, but that person is dim and intransigent. |
I’m also obese - morbidly - and struggle so much with despair over my body because I was also one very healthy and had a beautiful body until serious illness forced me to be largely sedentary, medication also tanked my metabolism and I started eating very unhealthy while coping with childhood trauma and the adult sexual harassment that triggered all the buried toxins to rise to the surface. If you can swim somewhere (YMCA?) I highly recommend it - it’s a great overall exercise and zero impact, so really perfect for heavy people. I’m anxious for the pool at my low cost gym to reopen. In the meantime it’s walking in the woods with my dog where I’m less likely to see people and feel their judging gaze, and where the surface is gentler on my joints - sidewalks give me sore feet and shin splints. One thing that makes me crazy - my doctor sent me for an evaluation at the medical weight management center, and the bariatric surgeon was very bullish on me getting sleeve gastrectomy. My insurance company will happily shell out many thousands for me to go under the knife - but won’t shell out anything for gym membership or personal training. I truly believe that with the help and motivation from a trainer I could make a serious change in my health without surgery, but I can’t afford a trainer on my own. I hesitate to just jump in and try weights and machines and all that without guidance, because I have a number of previous injuries from the serious illness I suffered and I’m afraid to hurt myself in a serious way - I would need the guidance of a professional, like a PT (physical therapist) even to make sure I could work out without harming myself in permanent ways. I think this is a big issue in our healthcare system, that it will happily pay tens of thousands and risk the costs of very serious surgical complications, but won’t pay a few thousand to give an obese person with health issues an opportunity to get expert guidance in changing their lifestyle and health for the better. It just seems to underscore that true health isn’t really the objective. |
I think a lot of obesity in low income POc can be linked to trauma.
I do agree we need to treat like a systemic health issue. Why can’t middle schools have home EC c Asses where kids learn about shopping for healthy meals, cooking, differences between soda, juice, and water, the cost of obesity, calories in, calories out,etc. honestly I would teach about the nastiness of the fast food industry and factory farming too. |
The only dim and intransigent here are the apologists that can’t accept the historical data. It’s all right there. Obesity didn’t just appear out of nowhere. It’s not some long complicated explanation for the majority affected. And people do care. Thats why this thread is here. It’s dragging us all down. What do you think the affect is on the US economy and our health care costs? All bad news. But words are cheap, so we will just continue using those and gloss over reality since feels. |
Agree 100%. This should be on the agenda for every education secretary of every state. |
I don’t want to derail this thread, but to the both of you posters, I think help may be coming in the form of a pill if you are open to it. Read about semaglutide. I was a part of a study with this medication and it really helped me. I lost a significant amount of weight and it helped me get motivated to exercise because I loss so much weight, I had the energy to exercise. It’s not a cure. And as soon as the study ended I gained some weight back. But I’m bringing this up in this thread because it finally worked on the physiological brain fv%ck that I felt food was doing to me. Even though this medication doesn’t work on the brain, because I lost so much weight I was able to see myself differently for the first time in 35 years. I was able to see me not fat. And wow that was a real brain f-+$ck. I was no longer waiting to die fat. See that’s the thing people that haven’t been fat before don’t realize either. When you are fat, you are invisible. People look past you. You can move in this world like a ghost. That’s how I felt, but when I lost the weight, I couldn’t do that anymore. People suddenly saw me. I wasn’t invisible anymore. That has pros and cons. So I was happy to gain the weight back, I didn’t like the attention of being smaller. Some of these posters think being fat is just calories in and calories out, that’s it’s just will power. That’s just a tiny piece of the puzzle. For many who have been fat for most of their lives, it’s a part of them, it’s a part of me. It is a core part of who I am. And you can be afraid of what life will be if that piece of the puzzle isn’t there. When I lost weight, I still had bills to pay, I still had a sucky a$$ job. But for many years, I thought if I just lost the weight it would be all rainbows and roses. But life is still $hit and you still got folks like many on this thread judging you. |
So you've got it all wrong. Glycemic index of sucrose (table sugar) is 65 while for white bread it is actually higher - 75. Besides, it's glycemic LOAD and not index that is more important and accurate. For example, watermelon has high GI but low GL which means that it will have rather low impact on your blood glucose because carb content in one serving is only 5 grams. Mind boggling, right? HOWEVER, all there is to know is that
That's what I and other pps where trying to explain. But no, you choose to demonize only *added* sugar. |
Pp. Forgot to post a link.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/the-lowdown-on-glycemic-index-and-glycemic-load |
Well, yes, you do seem to place your feelings above science and reason. |
I have read about semaglutide, when you’ve posted about it before. Not currently available in the USA for weight loss alone - my pre-diabetes would have to become diabetes before I could get a prescription. About the imagining oneself not fat: I’ve been fat for less than a decade and spent the vast majority of my life healthy weight - and subject from the time I ‘developed’ at age 11, and subsequently experienced my first molestation by an adult male stranger who ‘copped a feel’ at a parks and recreation sporting event, to the blistering humility of the very often highly intrusive and even assaultive male gaze. If there is one thing that is a benefit of my obesity, it is that I no longer see myself sexualized in the eyes of half the people I encounter in my life. It’s really, really sad that I had to become obese/unhealthy to finally feel this freedom of being invisible to that assault, and it’s sad that as a survivor of molestation in early childhood, and date rape as the means by which I lost my virginity in high school, and a lifetime of experiences of sexual harassment in academic and the workplace, I actually feel apprehensive about losing my weight because all that might start up again and I’ve already endured nearly 4 decades of it. Someone above posted that obesity in low income POC is largely linked to trauma. Well I’m here to attest that in my experience, my own and knowledge of many other women who are obese, trauma is also at the root of a lot of obesity in middle and upper middle class white women, too. (I don’t know about obese men in those income brackets.) |
I woke up this morning thinking about this thread and the example of Subway in particular. I recall an episode of the Biggest Loser where the trainers treated everyone to a teriyaki. Chicken sub and extolled the virtues of this healthy lunch. That's the problem! So much added sugar and so much bad information. So many of us are trying so hard. We tried nutri systems and weight watchers and Jane Brody and fit it's and podcasts and it really does feel like the whole diet industry just takes your money and lies to you. He'll, I went to some shady place where they sold me amphetamines to curb my appetite. Now I have given up carbs and sugar and am weighing and measuring my food. I have been dieting for thirty years. |