10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

One of you stated, “If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example.” Please explain how it would be possible to use a “real example.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

One of you stated, “If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example.” Please explain how it would be possible to use a “real example.”

If the dr can discuss a fake case and pass it off as real and that is okay, then it follows that an actually real case would be okay.

It doesnt make any sense that the story about this fake 10 year old would be fine if privacy were an insurmountable obstacle to sharing information about cases with the media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

You don't need to "put out information" about a case to acknowledge that it exists, or that an investigation has been launched. This story, if it is real, reports a crime. It is not out of line to ask what is being done about the crime. There has to be some way to confirm the facts as reported in the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

It sounds like you immediately understood the story of the 10 year old to be fake, then, because it would have been a "huge violation" of her privacy to have the dr announce it on the news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

It sounds like you immediately understood the story of the 10 year old to be fake, then, because it would have been a "huge violation" of her privacy to have the dr announce it on the news.

HIPPA, why isn’t the doc following HIPPA?

Because there’s no victim.

What’s HIPPA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

One of you stated, “If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example.” Please explain how it would be possible to use a “real example.”

If the dr can discuss a fake case and pass it off as real and that is okay, then it follows that an actually real case would be okay.

It doesnt make any sense that the story about this fake 10 year old would be fine if privacy were an insurmountable obstacle to sharing information about cases with the media.

Doctors generally are not in the business of broadcasting information about individual patients to the media, even anonymously. Would you be comfortable going to a doctor who did this?

The Indiana doctor is not some fringed wacko with nothing to lose here. She is a professor at the University of Indiana medical school, and presumably will be subject to an inquiry if there are any questions on the part of the medial school about the validity of her story. If nothing happens to her there, that strongly suggests the university has grounds to believe the account is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

It sounds like you immediately understood the story of the 10 year old to be fake, then, because it would have been a "huge violation" of her privacy to have the dr announce it on the news.

HIPPA, why isn’t the doc following HIPPA?

Because there’s no victim.

Doctors can share information about patients as long as they do so in a way that does not disclose identifying information. Doctors do this all the time when they present case studies at conferences and in instructional contexts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what I’m taking from this discussion is that forced birthers justify their draconian views on abortion by telling themselves that minors never get pregnant due to rape/incest and therefore there is no need for exceptions to abortion bans to protect them. If that’s incorrect, please explain how you reconcile your views with the repeated efforts in this discussion to deny that the fact pattern could have occurred.

Sad. We are saying that THIS particular case is a lie. And by lying, this doctor has done a ton of damage

And how would you feel if the case were real? After all, these kinds of pregnancies do happen. Do you believe that when it does happen, the victim should have access to abortion without having to splash her name and story all over the media to satisfy your desire for lurid details and confirmation that the 10 year old wasn’t just a little whore whom didn’t bother to use birth control?

We are talking about THIS CASE in particular which, as time goes on, looks more and more like a lie.
There are so many red flags here.... not to mention.... that Ohio does not have a "6 week ban" on abortions. They have a heartbeat law.

The left is losing credibility by trotting out fake stories to garner outrage. I just hope the activist doctor who started this whole thing is held accountable.

It looks really bad for pro choice. If there are so many cases of this like they want us to believe, why use a fake case. Why not just use a real example

Explain how this would work. Should the raped pregnant 10-year-old schedule an interview with Anderson Cooper?

It's impossible for you to be that stupid

DP. Well then explain how we would have public information about individual 10 years who are impregnated by abusers? There are very good reasons there aren’t any publicized cases, but forced birthers prefer to deny those realities so they can pretend is just doesn’t happen in order to justify their depraved views on abortion.

Prosecutors can confirm a case exists without disclosing the victims dentist.

Prosecutors are not going to put out anonymizes lists of all of their child abuse cases so people can comb through and try to identify who the cases might be about. And especially would not put out information about cases that might have resulted in pregnancy because it would be a huge violation of the victim if someone were able to identify them based on the released information.

It sounds like you immediately understood the story of the 10 year old to be fake, then, because it would have been a "huge violation" of her privacy to have the dr announce it on the news.

You don’t understand the privacy laws on this. Perhaps educate yourself before you spout off so you don’t look like a fool.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.

Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.

No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.

Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.

It’s in the link/tweet I responding to. Contrary to his claims, most cases like this would not have rape kits because that would require reporting very shortly after an incident of assault occurred since the window for a rape kit is so narrow. The doctor here would have seen this girl more than two weeks after she conceived, so even if the case were reported and there was an investigation, there would be no rape kit collection unless the girl had coincidentally been raped again within a couple of days before investigators sought the kit to allow for a valid collection. So the AG was lying when he said you would expect there to be a rape kit in this case if it were reported. Odds are there would not be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.

Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.

No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.

JFC. The jackals here who were dancing on "IT'S A LIE" should all apologize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Ohio AG is lying through his teeth.

Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?

The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.

No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.

YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/

A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.

Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.

I'm really glad this information was published, and that's exactly what people have been asking for.

So as you see, it is in fact possible to confirm the facts and truth of the case without disclosing the identity of the victim.