Andy Dick is the worst example of a "gray area" ever! The guy is living personal boundary violation machine. |
But you’re not making serious sexual comments to each orher. By your own post, you’re joking. Do you see the difference? |
Of course his whole schtick is based on violating boundaries. As Dick himself said: "My middle name is ‘misconduct.’ They know what they signed up for."' But if what he really did was proposition 4 people on set, and didn't grope anyone, is that inappropriate or not? |
How about pubic hairs in coffee? |
Different poster - I think there is more leeway for men to joke with other men about sexual content because it's not the norm for men to be seeking sex from other men. There's less likelihood that: a) the joke will be misperceived as being serious; and/or b) the "just joking" will be used as a pretext to cover up what was really harassment. |
Do that, and the only job you'll be able to get is Supreme Court Justice -- much like U.S. Senator is one of the few job opportunities for child molesters. |
Yes, but if I made the same joking sexualized comments to a female co-worker (“hey Mary, I see you’re wearing those tight slacks again to show off your toned ass!”), it would be a problem. And if I told my male co-worker that I like his new haircut, it would also be weird. But the same comment to a female co-worker would not. I’m not trying to excuse inappropriate behavior or comments. I’m just saying there isn’t a one to one comparison between what comments are appropriate or not between same sex and opposite sex conversations. |
You shouldn’t be commenting on your female coworkers haircut either, actually. That’s the whole point. |
Can’t agree with you on rule 1. I’m a married late 30s guy and before meeting my wife, I dated five women at three different jobs. They were there, willing, and available. Stuff happens. |
| 1645 again. I also think it’s easy to say “no personal relations with co workers” but that’s not terribly realistic. It’s an easy rule for me to follow because I’m married for a long time and not interested in anyone else. But many of my friends married, and previously dated, co workers. Many of my single co workers date each other. It’s simply unavoidable that some co workers will have personal relations and some of those will involve sex. Navigating what’s appropriate and inappropriate can be difficult. |
So SHE's the nut because she's feeling harrased?!?!?! GFY. Go back to your MRA meeting, jerk. |
Really? You never compliment another person who you work with? |
NP here, and female. I have been thinking about this lately because obviously this stuff is all over the news and coming up everywhere. But I can honestly say that I have never felt constrained by not telling a coworker "you look nice/attractive/fit" or whatever. I compliment my coworkers all the time on their work performance, thank them for how they handle things in my absence, etc. I have commented to male coworkers "I see you got new glasses" and left it at that. This has not made me feel like I am not developing rapport with them, and I think it's odd that some men seem to feel like they have to comment on appearance. |
I can't imagine telling a co-worker "you look fit" - that seems too body-related. I absolutely will comment to a male co-worker if I think he's lost weight; but I'd never comment at all on weight to a female co-worker. If a female (or male) co-worker shows up with a new haircut ...
... then I'm absolutely going to compliment the new look (even if it's a bad haircut). I don't see a problem with any of that. Do you? |
DP, but why only women? Do you compliment men's haircuts? People (and I use the term advisedly, women do this too) really don't realize how often they default to talking about appearance with women. It's culturally ingrained. Clothes, "have you lost weight?!", hair, even just "you look nice today"; it's constant. Men don't get these comments so they think of it as a rare but appreciated compliment. Women get it all the time and the cumulative effect is that it's just a way that society defaults us to not serious or decorative, while men are considered substantive and vital. |