I am a black woman and I'm a runner. Whenever I come upon a construction site of a new house, I usually stop and look inside. I'm curious. A lot of us do that. That is not criminal. I also go around cars and trucks. Also not unusual. What was he supposed to do. If you are stopped and have a shot gun, what that hell am I supposed to do? I'm going to be scared as hell. Who does that? I'm not going to stop just because you tell me to stop. I'm going to think that you are a lunatic. I don't have to show you my freedom papers. This is not 1850 Georgia. |
No, sorry. Under GA's law, their "stopping" him did not fit what was legally permissible. AND they used deadly force where it was not warranted. BTW, I'm putting aside all your BS attempts to smear the victim here. At best he's guilty of uncomfortable running attire and being nosy. And, BTW, both of those traits are on fully display in my neighborhood on the daily. And are not grounds for murdering someone. |
^^^Absolutely this!!! [NP; also black jogger] |
I'm not stopping for anyone with a gun if you are not the police. |
| What is wrong with you all? Please stop trespassing on people's construction sites. It's just not appropriate, no matter what color your skin is. |
Those men behaved like lunatics and that man acted as though his life was being threatened - which it clearly was. |
Yup. People do this all the time. |
When my house was under construction I also stopped by models that were further along to make comparisons. It helped me to figure out what changes, if any, I wanted to request while my house was being built. I felt perfectly fine doing it and never once thought that someone might chase me down, corner me and shoot me dead for it. Seriously, that never was on my radar at all. |
Exactly. Those men had no authority to arrest him. He had no obligation to stop for someone who was chasing him down the street with a gun. They initiated the encounter, they pursued him, and they were not acting in self-defense. He was right to run away from them, and if he had his own weapon he would have been justified in shooting them. He was not committing a violent crime -- in fact, the owner of the site told the WaPo that he had never reported anything stolen. The victim was not a nuisance to the men who killed him. They didn't own the property. They were acting as vigilantes. |
They chased him down, cornered him AND pointed loaded guns at him. |
Also, "not appropriate" doesn't mean "entitles someone to chase you down and kill you." |
I agree with this assessment. I can not fathom why these men took it upon themselves to do this. It wasn't even their business. |
What is wrong with you all? Stop shooting young, unarmed black men who pose no threat to your life. Stop flashing your guns around trying to act tough and pretending to be cops. It's just not appropriate, no matter what color your skin is. |
| For the record, it’s perfectly possible to believe that the killers were at best reckless, and at worst evil, and in any event deserve a long stretch in prison, without having to buy the full package about the totally-innocent jogger or the fundamentally racist nature of America, both of which, IMO, are wrong. |
Actually that is trespassing and illegal, I know no one that does this, what if you get injured |