Cambridge tour vs Sussex tour

[Anonymous]

Cannot get over the look on people's faces. Meghan's era is established.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^ not healthy to get pregnant so soon for mother or baby in utero.

We have several sets of Irish twins in my extended family. Kids and mom all turned out fine.

[Anonymous]

Meghan simply loves basking in the spotlight. There must be a royal advisor somewhere telling her it’s not all about her. But people are way too enamored with being “woke” and supporting a half-POC Hollywood C-lister.

[Anonymous]

Have you seen the photos where she us trying to hug someone and they are trying to curtsy, basically motor boating her. There are protocols for reasons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you seen the photos where she us trying to hug someone and they are trying to curtsy, basically motor boating her. There are protocols for reasons.

Yeah, its cute. Everyone is saying she's so kind. Aside from all that, the woman she's hugging? A long time friend who first invited her to be prominent speaker of the same organization back in 2014.

[Anonymous]

I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

The British Royal Family is a cultural position, not political.

(Nor is the US a reliable trading partner lately.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

The British Royal Family is a cultural position, not political.

(Nor is the US a reliable trading partner lately.)

Except they use them as political pawns for 'soft' diplomacy. Or was Will's Pakistan visit 3 days ago just a vacation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

Do you also think Trump has done more for America than any other president? LOL. You are hilarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

Do you also think Trump has done more for America than any other president? LOL. You are hilarious.

Hell no. Why would I? He barely leaves the golf course and is a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

IMHO she and Harry have done more for the monarchy and their connection to the Commonwealth (you know the 30+ countries that also have a Queen Elizabeth II) than anyone else in that family in the decades since Diana's death.

They need her. Especially with Brexit, the renegotiation of European political connections, and the fact that the UK itself needs as much trade partners as it can get.

I know that's a bit above these boards heads (and you'd rather go on about dresses), but the political and economic ramifications cannot be overstated.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/julia-gillard-on-uk-trading-with-australia-after-brexit-1-6298800

The Australia prime minister put it pretty blunt the other day:

Julia Gillard, of the Australian Labour party, was interviewed at the conference by Sky and said that China, the USA and the EU come first in the eyes of the country's trade negotiators.

"What I do know from my days as former prime minister is this: the United Kingdom is not in the sort of absolute top tier of our current trading relationships obviously," she told Sky's Kay Burley.

"China is, the US is," she continued. "We are as a nation negotiating a free trade agreement with the European Union so those discussions are under way."

Do you also think Trump has done more for America than any other president? LOL. You are hilarious.

Wait. So you think Meghan is going to be brokering trade deals?
Girl can't even get a professional looking weave with access to top stylists.
How will an American that the British people hate because she constantly whines and talks down to them, get the Brits on the same page for Brexit.
If anything she is shining a brighter light on why; with Brexit, there should be no monarchy. People will be STRUGGLING real struggles with Brexit and likely don't want to continue to fund Royals jetting off to see Elton for a weekend or for 500,000 pound dresses for a night out. All of which Meghan is so clearly throwing in the face of the hard working Brits.

[Anonymous]

Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

You know no one stays hot forever. People will move on eventually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

She's gorgeous! And I love that she's shaking up the old, stodgy establishment.