Cambridge tour vs Sussex tour

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

You know no one stays hot forever. People will move on eventually.

I’m of the opinion that Meghan will age well. She’s six years older than Katie Hopkins and Angela Bassett is 17 years older than Katie. Yet Katie looks like a shriveled fruit.

[Anonymous]

Meghan is six years YOUNGER than Katie (though it looks closer to 20)

[Anonymous]

She’s shallow.

[Anonymous]

Kate is younger than Meghan but Megs tries to be the "young little princess"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kate is younger than Meghan but Megs tries to be the "young little princess"

As opposed to Kate, who just likes to be breeder to the heirs?

Of course, that’s her job, that she’s been groomed into “her position” since she was a teenager, and which she chose. She didn’t even comment on lovely Rose. She hasn’t had a personality of her own since that picture of her in the fashion show, and maybe before that.

It’s so ironic that so many on here are complaining about the Monarchy, yet are so stuck on deportment, protocol, etc.

Harry watched his mother be killed for no benefit to herself, or to himself. Wills is the next heir, so it’s wise for him to keep the typical “stiff upper lip”. I don’t even understand where comparison comes from between how they run their lives, as really, they could be no different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

You know no one stays hot forever. People will move on eventually.

I’m of the opinion that Meghan will age well. She’s six years older than Katie Hopkins and Angela Bassett is 17 years older than Katie. Yet Katie looks like a shriveled fruit.

Who is this Katie Hopkins? She’s hideous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate is younger than Meghan but Megs tries to be the "young little princess"

As opposed to Kate, who just likes to be breeder to the heirs?

Of course, that’s her job, that she’s been groomed into “her position” since she was a teenager, and which she chose. She didn’t even comment on lovely Rose. She hasn’t had a personality of her own since that picture of her in the fashion show, and maybe before that.

It’s so ironic that so many on here are complaining about the Monarchy, yet are so stuck on deportment, protocol, etc.

Harry watched his mother be killed for no benefit to herself, or to himself. Wills is the next heir, so it’s wise for him to keep the typical “stiff upper lip”. I don’t even understand where comparison comes from between how they run their lives, as really, they could be no different.

I don't give a damn about the Monarchy but I am not stupid enough to think that CENTURIES old institutions will be modernized by some American C list actress. There are rules/protocols/expectations. Meghan claimed to know all of this yet is now complaining about those very things? It is like applying to be a waitress but then refusing to serve food and complaining about the Establishment that just hired you.

As for Diana's death. Harry inherrited a great sum of wealth from that in what is now a trust for him. I am NOT saying that makes her death ok. It doest. But to say he gained nothing? He gained wealth and the laws changed after that putting limitations on the paps chasing public figures. So, because of that he has been able to live a quite private life unless he wanted things known. This is why it is baffling why now they keep claiming they want privacy but yet continue to demand attention. Its like, just go home and chill. No one is breaking down your doors. Simmer down.
Who the hell knows where Will and Kate even really live? She goes to the grocery store, goes to school but yet you only see photos they want you to see. H and M can do the same. They just don't want to. Well he does, but i don't believe she does. His problem with the media is not hers.
Did you hear her words on the video. She NEVER said she wanted privacy (that Harry keeps asking for). She wants fairness and it seems fairness to her is only glowing headlines. WE must look away as she outspends those higher in line to the thrown. WE must look away as she takes months off of maternity leave (after blasting Kate for taking 2 months); we must look away as she breaks protocol after protocol all in the name of progress or we are all racist? Is that it?

She is going to peace out sooner than later and this LA trip will be interesting. I doubt she will return to England and Harry will be left unmedicated and confused as hell as to what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate is younger than Meghan but Megs tries to be the "young little princess"

As opposed to Kate, who just likes to be breeder to the heirs?

Of course, that’s her job, that she’s been groomed into “her position” since she was a teenager, and which she chose. She didn’t even comment on lovely Rose. She hasn’t had a personality of her own since that picture of her in the fashion show, and maybe before that.

It’s so ironic that so many on here are complaining about the Monarchy, yet are so stuck on deportment, protocol, etc.

Harry watched his mother be killed for no benefit to herself, or to himself. Wills is the next heir, so it’s wise for him to keep the typical “stiff upper lip”. I don’t even understand where comparison comes from between how they run their lives, as really, they could be no different.

I don't give a damn about the Monarchy but I am not stupid enough to think that CENTURIES old institutions will be modernized by some American C list actress. There are rules/protocols/expectations. Meghan claimed to know all of this yet is now complaining about those very things? It is like applying to be a waitress but then refusing to serve food and complaining about the Establishment that just hired you.

As for Diana's death. Harry inherrited a great sum of wealth from that in what is now a trust for him. I am NOT saying that makes her death ok. It doest. But to say he gained nothing? He gained wealth and the laws changed after that putting limitations on the paps chasing public figures. So, because of that he has been able to live a quite private life unless he wanted things known. This is why it is baffling why now they keep claiming they want privacy but yet continue to demand attention. Its like, just go home and chill. No one is breaking down your doors. Simmer down.
Who the hell knows where Will and Kate even really live? She goes to the grocery store, goes to school but yet you only see photos they want you to see. H and M can do the same. They just don't want to. Well he does, but i don't believe she does. His problem with the media is not hers.
Did you hear her words on the video. She NEVER said she wanted privacy (that Harry keeps asking for). She wants fairness and it seems fairness to her is only glowing headlines. WE must look away as she outspends those higher in line to the thrown. WE must look away as she takes months off of maternity leave (after blasting Kate for taking 2 months); we must look away as she breaks protocol after protocol all in the name of progress or we are all racist? Is that it?

She is going to peace out sooner than later and this LA trip will be interesting. I doubt she will return to England and Harry will be left unmedicated and confused as hell as to what happened.

Huh? Everyone knows where all these people live because their renovations are taxpayer funded. A simple google can let you know. And frankly if any of them are secretly livin somewhere else after hitting the British citizens up for dough to renovate living quarters that is an issue.

Harry was already wealthy before she died by virtue of his dad and presumably would have inherited Diana’s money no matter when she died. In fact maybe she would have married and outlived her next wealthy husband and then he would be any wealthier. I highly doubt the financial benefits of losing your parent during childhood are somehow greater than losing them later.

Meghan literally never commented, let alone “blasted,” on Kate’s maternity leave at all. Unless of course you think she is commenting on DCUM. I personally would’ve liked her to have taken 6 months to continue to normalize that for normal women.

But most of all there is no “centuries old protocol” regarding online gossip rags....for very obvious reasons. The monarchy =/= the press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy in her complaining about the press being unfair to her is what sets people off about her. This is the same lady that started planting stories in the press about HERSELF as soon as she got engaged. The stories about Doria being invited to Christmas at Sandringham? The stories about Meghan being asked to be godmother to Louis? The numerous stories in People about her being a saint and misrepresenting the letter to her father that only quoted anonymous sources and anonymous friends? It's clear she has some kind of contract with People and has been trying to manipulate the press since the beginning. But now it's "unfair" because she's not controlling the headlines? Add that to her arrogance in thinking that her measly TV career has somehow given her more experience playing the press game than the decades of experience that the Royal Family has. And then there's the issue of starting off her relationship with her in-laws by planting stories in the media to begin with. No wonder the RF doesn't trust her.

You are treating gossip rag stories as fact. There is no proof that she planted any stories.

Except who else would have planted those stories? Who else would benefit from any of those stories? The Royal Family? Harry? Her father? Do you think random people would have created these stories out of thin air to sell to the press? The only person who would have incentive and therefore benefit from any of these stories is Meghan.

The courtiers of house cambridge who want to swap the brothers in terms of level of press

Or any number of people! Rose herself for one...can’t say that I knew who she was before this...maybe she wanted to swap her old husband for someone more age appropriate. Or prince Charles or Camilla who have been racked over the coals for being adulterers for decades. Or Prince Andrew/Fergie/Beatrice/Eugenie trying to throw anything at the wall because they know what is coming down the pike with the Epstein scandal. Tons of people would benefit from that story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love her or hate her - Meghan is #1.

I wonder where they got this photo from? One of her magazine shoots?

You know no one stays hot forever. People will move on eventually.

I’m of the opinion that Meghan will age well. She’s six years older than Katie Hopkins and Angela Bassett is 17 years older than Katie. Yet Katie looks like a shriveled fruit.

Whoa. I am the same age as Meghan (I'm a POC woman too) and that Katie Hopkins could be my auntie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t find it charming or appropriate for Me-Again to air how much her life sucks while using the backdrop of Africa with all the poor people who face insurmountable odds in their lives.

She and Prince Andrew are pulling everything down. This woman has everything she could want and yet she is tone deaf eith her approach. The half million dollar baby shower she flew over to attend. Flying off to see Serena after the baby (as she was supposedly struggling mind you), and so many other things.

Harry made the wrong move marrying her, and it’s now a disaster no matter how much glitter and gold you want to put on it. They should renounce the royal life and disappear. I wish Harry would have taken things slower and maybe he would have opened his eyes as to how domineering and calculating she really is.

You can’t renounce the royal life and disappear. The interest doesn’t go away. That’s basically what Diana did when she divorced Charles and we all saw how that turned out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy in her complaining about the press being unfair to her is what sets people off about her. This is the same lady that started planting stories in the press about HERSELF as soon as she got engaged. The stories about Doria being invited to Christmas at Sandringham? The stories about Meghan being asked to be godmother to Louis? The numerous stories in People about her being a saint and misrepresenting the letter to her father that only quoted anonymous sources and anonymous friends? It's clear she has some kind of contract with People and has been trying to manipulate the press since the beginning. But now it's "unfair" because she's not controlling the headlines? Add that to her arrogance in thinking that her measly TV career has somehow given her more experience playing the press game than the decades of experience that the Royal Family has. And then there's the issue of starting off her relationship with her in-laws by planting stories in the media to begin with. No wonder the RF doesn't trust her.

You are treating gossip rag stories as fact. There is no proof that she planted any stories.

Except who else would have planted those stories? Who else would benefit from any of those stories? The Royal Family? Harry? Her father? Do you think random people would have created these stories out of thin air to sell to the press? The only person who would have incentive and therefore benefit from any of these stories is Meghan.

The courtiers of house cambridge who want to swap the brothers in terms of level of press

Or any number of people! Rose herself for one...can’t say that I knew who she was before this...maybe she wanted to swap her old husband for someone more age appropriate. Or prince Charles or Camilla who have been racked over the coals for being adulterers for decades. Or Prince Andrew/Fergie/Beatrice/Eugenie trying to throw anything at the wall because they know what is coming down the pike with the Epstein scandal. Tons of people would benefit from that story.

I like Rose. She has no chill.

This is what she posted the day of the Queen's speech.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3nZb6aJ_mQ/

For reference, that's her husband and yes he's holding the crown of England in his hands. Rose (loud and clear): look at how powerful I am.

[Anonymous]

It's amusing that Buckingham Palace is clearly paying attention to everything. But the fact that they have no official comment is gutless in my opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing that Buckingham Palace is clearly paying attention to everything. But the fact that they have no official comment is gutless in my opinion.

Then you don't know them or follow them huh. They don't comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing that Buckingham Palace is clearly paying attention to everything. But the fact that they have no official comment is gutless in my opinion.

Then you don't know them or follow them huh. They don't comment.

Uh huh, keep telling yourself that.

Buckingham Palace Issues Another Statement About Prince Andrew Regarding Jeffrey Epstein
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a28739304/buckingham-palace-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-comment/

Even if they hadn't issued an official written statement, this cheesy pedophile grin sitting next to the Queen on the way to church is all the evidence needed.