Agree. I've been a full time working mom year round for 17+ years, as have many of my friends. My youngest child is finishing up his first year in high school, so I've lived through the middle school years. We all make it work. |
No, it's not. My kids were gone 10 hours a day starting in middle school. They do not need a parent at home. |
Why? I have two high schoolers now and we have dinner as a family almost every night. Why should I find a job that lets me get home at 3:30 instead of 5:30? |
It's not a big deal. My husband and I both know that both of us are always on call for family emergencies, and we do fine as a family unit and also at both of our places of employment. This is 2017 people! Unless you're a CEO I think every employee expects some flexibility to handle personal life. |
It's working for her and the kids, but not for him. |
I raised two children without drug or alcohol problems, to be active in sports and afterschool clubs and church youth group. Having a parent at home probably is helpful, but the question is at what cost? If you would have only made 20 or 30 K more if you had gone from part time to full time work, that wouldn't pay for much spread over 5 children, but some of us with fewer children, higher pay and more invested in their careers don't see a parent home immediately after school as a necessity worth giving up one whole income. |
I know and do all that planning, and still work 45 hours a week. Please. |
But you could do 100% of all of this on your lunch hour, after work or on weekends. The hard truth is you like having a lot of leisure time. |
The solution to fairness and equity is not for one spouse to cut back on paid work though. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. |
My husband is a contractor. Makes much more than he would as a fed and works 40 hours a week. |
Give me a break. |
But much less job security, that's why he makes more than a fed. |
OP's wife continuing to work such limited hours might not "work" as well for the kids in the long term as her working full-time would if the former means that their college won't be paid for. |
Exactly. If her continuing to SAH when once her kids were all in school worked best for the PP with 5 kids' family & she & her DH were both happy with the areangement, great. But, barring perhaps families with kids who have severe medical issues or other special needs that require extra supervision &/or tons of medical/therapy appointments, having a parent at home once the kids are in middle school is hardly a necessity nor is it even worth the drop in income for many families. Fwiw, my parents also raised 5 kids without drug or alcohol issues, pregnancy scares, bad grades, etc, & they both worked full-time. Yes, there are kids with 2 working parents who end up with these issues but plenty of kids with SAH parents do, as well. |
The hard truth is that moms like you have resigned themselves to being the default parent and accept sexism within your family while shaming moms who work PT or SAH for refusing to accept the second shift. -FT working mom who struggles with being the default parent |