|
| Perhaps have your family put aside these discussions with your DS for now; tour the colleges that he is interested in, including Princeton, over spring break; and gently persuade him over the summer that the best strategic decision would be to apply to Princeton single choice early action since he has the legacy hook. If he is accepted, it would not be binding. He could then apply regular round to any other universities on his list. I don't know enough about admissions but I wonder whether Princeton legacies who are full pay have less of a legacy preference if they wait to apply in the regular round instead of applying early action. |
| Back off & would put money down that he'll come around by time to really apply. |
Fixed that for you. Honestly, you lost me totally by writing this out. Can't you take a step back and recognize that even if he does go to Princeton (and I hope out of his own free will, and not some ridiculous family tradition), you should at that point step off and *not* try to guide him on what classes or professors to look for, how to navigate social life, etc.? That's not your job! That kind of intrusive helicopter parenting will only hurt him in the long run. |
| I went to Princeton and DD went to Yale. She had a MUCH better time than I did. It would be horrible if you forced your son to go to Princeton and he was miserable. |
I am the poster of this idea. Glad you like it! Now you just need to get the rest of your family on board with this plan. I will also say this gently -- you and your family need a little more reflection. Even by the snooty standards of DCUM your posts sound almost trollish -- you guys really have no idea how overprivileged you sound (oh the teasing if he attended a *lesser* ivy!) Perhaps you are just letting yourself speak honestly on an anonymous board but you may want to examine your thinking. In particular, college is clearly a big part of your family, but it is really contextual. Vey, very few people share your history with a college or even know more than a few people who do. Even on this board. And for success, other connections and accomplishments are really key. Skills are key. There aren't as many places who will hire you just because you went to Princeton anymore -- it's really the whole person and all the things you've done and of course, yes your family and connections as much as ever. But if you focus on all the things you, your son and family have accomplished a little more I think you'll be in better shape. And yes, you need to understand that going to UC Berkeley or even Columbia isn't exactly the end of the world for people, even in Princeton means a lot in particular in your family. Focus your standards and expectations more broadly. The 21st century is going to be as different from the 20th as the 19th was from the 20th. It's a bumpy ride and I'm not sure how colleges are going to fare. It's not that they will evaporate but they will mean something different, surely, in 50 years than they do now. |
I don't mean this in a snarky way. I think I hate it because I was not from a family like OP's at all. I was a great student and an intellectual, but from a professional upper middle class immigrant family. I was a child prodigy and really, really smart. I was told I should go to a place like Princeton (or Harvard or whatever) because it was the best. What I wanted was the best, most rigorous academics. But there are really two things "best" colleges mean now. One is that, to a real extent, but schools like HYP are as much or more about social connections and polish and the pursuit of a privileged life. These are all things that are reasonable to aspire to. But I am not so motivated by these things -- I really wanted to learn. There is a great math and a great physics department at Princeton, as great as anywhere. But I wanted to be a great computer scientist. I was much happier at another HYPSM school that had that culture. And I am very successful now because I took advantage of it, more so than I would have been at Princeton. Princeton has good CS but no entrepreneurial paradigm upsetting culture in engineering outside of pure theory. But my roommates also hated it. I think really the issue was that all of us had the academic credentials to be there but not the social skills and/or interest to navigate Princeton's social scene. |
| Good for him that he doesn't want to use this affirmative action-ish way to leapfrog over others to get into college and instead wants to make his own way on his own merits. |
| Overall, Princeton provides the best undergraduate experience in the country, but it's not for every kid who is qualified to go there. |
|
| Well, a) he might not get in, and b), good for him for breaking a cycle of white privilege. |
This. Let's say everyone keeps pushing and he does apply and does go - do you think he will be happy there or will he resent everyone who pushed him for the rest of his life? He has to own the decision or it will never be a happy outcome. |
Agreed. The toxicity is coming from the adults who really should know better. I wouldn’t want to go to a school that produced such toxic people who care more about themselves than what is best for the child, either! This isn’t about you! It isn’t about your family! It’s about which school is the best for your child (to be determined by the one going to college, not the helicopter parents/grandparents). Calm down, stop with the craziness, take a deep breath, and realize that in the time between now and when applications are due (you kid is a junior FFS!), you child’s opinions/perceptions may change. But if you and your family continue on your paths of crazy, you will do more harm than good. |
This plan begs the crucial question which is does he get to choose which school he applies to SCEA? (Though if you offered him 12-14 months of no discussion, that might be its appeal!) |
| ^From his POV. |