Where did you get this from? FILs wife is neither evil, nor strange. She has been in their lives since they were born and we are usually very close to her. They also go to FILs house all the time, and have slept there before. And when they said they couldnt take care of the baby, he went with MIL and BIL instead for the last 2 days. |
I'm guessing sarcasm at DCUM helicoptering. |
A trip to Hawaii is not "once in a lifetime." It is a pretty standard, albeit expensive vacation destination.
If the "once in a lifetime" part was the free ticket, well, cry me a river - if OP can afford a nanny, she can afford to go to Hawaii at some point. |
The OP was worried about pumping. This could have been an issue with the baby being irritable too. |
Op, you are super duper defensive and that is blocking you from seeing this clearly. This was not a good idea. This was too much to ask. It did not go well for anyone involved. I am sure you were stressed, your ILs clearly had a miserable time and are harboring anger and resentment, your baby was miserable, and your older children, well, they got shuttled around a lot. So, not a good experience for any party, really. I think it is time to muster up your ability to really, sincerely say it was a bad idea, you are sorry. No qualifications, no justifications. Objectively, you and DH made a mistake. You expected and asked for too much, and you put your extended family in a bind. Simply tell them that, and explain that you will not be asking for such a large favor ever again. And then act on it. You want to go out, arrange for a babysitter in the future or don't go. A week long vacation when you have a toddler and a baby under a year is simply crazy and un-doable. A weekend, sure. And I maintain, when you were told that it was too much for them to deal with the baby, a signal call of distress if you will, you should have come home and taken over the situation rather than unloading your kids elsewhere. If you had done so, I am sure that good faith gesture would have resolved this issue. Honestly, you need to step back and let go of your defensive shield. You wanted to go, and so you justified it to yourself by planning it all out, but it really just wasn't a good plan. No amount of prep would have allowed this to go smoothly with such little kids. You should have not gone, taken them, or hired a full week sitter. You can't afford one, you are back to not going. |
I don't think you are being defensive or unreasonable OP. I too find your in-laws reaction baffling. If they said they were exhausted or wouldn't do that again - fine. But to get angry and hostile - seems like there is something else going on. Grandparents in their 50s and 60s who have been actively involved with the kids and who willingly take the kids should not be as angry as they are. I know many grandparents who do childcare for their young grandchildren, spending 40 hours a week with them. Your in-laws were spending about 2 hours a day with the kids at most and dealing with a couple accidents and wake-ups. That doesn't sound like something to be so angry about at all.
|
I agree that this is the best summary of the situation and the best advice. Now you know what they are prepared (and not) to handle--act accordingly in the future. |
It makes me laugh that someone being 51 is considered an older folk - too old to competently or capably care for a child. Look at all the parents how have kids in their 40s. At 51 they are still going to be parenting a child under 10. Someone should tell them that even though they think they can handle it - they can't. Most of the posters here must be very young to think of 51 and 60 as far too old to provide childcare. |
There is someone totally crazy who keeps posting on this thread |
You know what - everyone in this story will survive. And burden or not, that is what friends and family are for - to help out when needed, even if it is a once in a lifetime vacation opportunity. OP- I wish things went smoother - this will be a funny story to tell one day and your baby will not need therapy over it - she has already forgotten what happened! |
OP - don't take the bait with this judgemental looney. You had a well thought out plan and unfortuntely, it didn't work out. No biggie. |
Damn woman - your insanity cracks me up! |
NP - for what it's worth, my FIL and MIL never once offered to take care of grandchildren. Ever. Nor did they ever have them over night. And we live a mile apart. Well, it's their loss because they hardly know their almost adult grandchildren. |
OP, this is the best post. I think they are embarrassed that they could not handle your kids, OP, and that embarrassment has turned into anger at you and your DH. It's not fair, but they will in time get over it. Lesson learned, I hope, for all involved! Do not ever do anything like this again, OP. They can handle brief babysitting, but something this long is a no-no-never. It is so much work to take care of a baby when you are not used to it!! I have four kids, and when I got a puppy when my youngest was 6, I could not believe how tired I was when that @#$%## puppy woke me up twice every night!! I had thought I could handle it because I'd had four babies, but after a few years of getting a good night's sleep most nights, I could not believe how exhausted I was every single day because of that puppy! I was so sleep deprived and cranky that I wanted to get rid of the puppy more than once, but he finally started sleeping through the night, so we still have him. Lay low, OP. They will recover. |
Making it easy is giving them pullups for use with kids who are emergent and reading. That pee enough to soak through a sleeping bag. A little bit of honesty would have been good rather than multiple pee "accidents." A small wee-wake up-go to pot is different than a deluge. If I was OP and her DH I would be very nice to these people to keep the relationship and free occasional babysitting going. |