|
|
OP, your post is indecent. We all understand that you think you’ve accomplished something, and in some regards you have, but you should really consider why your child needed your constant attention and why you were so singularly focused on a particular outcome. We all want good outcomes for our children, but your “accomplishment” seems highly artificial and a powder keg ready to self-destruct.
We left the DC area because of people like you. While I agree that laissez faire parenting is not the appropriate counterpoint to your approach, there is a mean between your approach and your “competition’s” that is far more constructive for decent living. |
On the one hand: Congratulations. On the other hand: Now your kid has to survive in a college that might be to very stressful and way too hard. You need to be prepared to provide counseling and executive function coaching, if necessary, and to accept that your kid might end up being an English major with 2.3 GPA rather than a premed with 3.9 GPA. |
It’s not that - just OP’s lack of self-awareness that the prize school is likely not the best place for a kid with these issues. |
Again, I get your celebrating. It’s just so obnoxious to put others down (specifically your SIL) to make your role in your son’s success seem so much greater. I mean most people don’t find joy in their nieces’ and nephews’ parents being inadequate resulting in them becoming less than. |
I would say that to my best friend. She's a true friend who has supported me through ups and downs in life. |
Op, think about why you have no one in your life with whom you can share your child's accomplishments and failures and your mistakes. Spend some time reflecting and realize what that says about you as a person. Try to be a better person, friend, neighbor, colleague, daughter. |
|
Congrats op!
I am quite hands on with mine, though he isn’t ivy material, mostly due to not having the mental and physical stamina to do the work and lack of motivation. I still try to put him in the best position he can get! |
I bet her daughter is having a blast though! Good for her!😁 |
|
|
I'm happy you're happy, but stop equating the success/failure of the children to their parents' parenting styles!!!
It worked for you. Great. I think my close-supervision style of parenting works well for me and my kids too. DCUM naturally attracts the type A, perfectionist types who found their way to the DC area, not by accident. But the truth is: we all have parenting propensities that fit our personalities and psychological profiles! I could not possibly be a live-and-let-live parent. It's out of the range of my functionalities The laissez-faire parents are like that because that's how their brain works as well. They probably could not easily force themselves to parent in any other way. And I'm sure that works for most of their kids.
You're not understanding the underlying human psychology here. |
| It’s possible to disagree with the OP without acting like she is a serial killer. |
Truth hurts doesn't it. Why does the op need to get validation from strangers while also insulting her nieces/nephews. Something is broken inside op. Maybe therapy can help. |
Are you sure this isn't a troll post? Drug tests? |
That's a good point. I work with a woman who close supervised her kid. Managed all his extra activities, made sure he did his volunteer hours for whatever society, reviewed his homework every night. He's at a strong school for his major. She's now looking for internships for him. Hope she's happy, hope he is happy, but that's not my personality and not what I am doing with my kid. |