School Shooting in Michigan. 3 Teens DEAD. 1 15-yr old suspect in custody.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at his old YouTube videos from a few years ago, he appears like a sweet, polite child talking about his boat collection and playing basketball with a group of friends; in one he his conscientious of the cost of a souvenir at a bear attraction.His parents can use these as evidence that they had no idea of his decline into a dark world.

This is prime evidence of bullying.

And speaking of parents, why aren’t the parents of bully’s held criminally responsible? Maybe if we did that, bullying would stop increasing every year.

I assume Oxford was remote his entire 9th grade year? Or at least most of it. Have to wonder if he lost his old friend group during remote learning transition to high school and/or was on radicalized by unfettered internet access at home all day while parents were at work?

Cyber bullying increased exponentially during remote learning.

Why do you so desperately want to excuse these three monstrous people with lies and speculation? Maybe look within yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The sheriff has stated in no uncertain terms several times that there is NO evidence the gun was secured in anyway. None.

AND there is no way the guidance counselor followed policy here.

Not sure why there can’t be numerous responsible parties here, because there clearly are.

The parents storage of the gun is not illegal.

The district will be sued for a billion with a B dollars before the end of the week.

Hope the parents are sued for at least that much, each, and they never live their (ab)normal lives again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you look at his old YouTube videos from a few years ago, he appears like a sweet, polite child talking about his boat collection and playing basketball with a group of friends; in one he his conscientious of the cost of a souvenir at a bear attraction.His parents can use these as evidence that they had no idea of his decline into a dark world.

This is prime evidence of bullying.

And speaking of parents, why aren’t the parents of bully’s held criminally responsible? Maybe if we did that, bullying would stop increasing every year.

I assume Oxford was remote his entire 9th grade year? Or at least most of it. Have to wonder if he lost his old friend group during remote learning transition to high school and/or was on radicalized by unfettered internet access at home all day while parents were at work?

Cyber bullying increased exponentially during remote learning.

Why do you so desperately want to excuse these three monstrous people with lies and speculation? Maybe look within yourself.

x100000


Problem parents raise problem children. These parents were in denial to a point they refused to take their kid home, when he cried out for help. May they rot in hell.

[Anonymous]

The alleged request that they take him home sounds like fabricated CYA to me. School discipline is black and white. Either he was being kicked out of school for the day or days or he wasn’t. He wasn’t. Period end of story. I personally don’t believe school officials “suggested” he leave school at all. It is a bit nonsensical that a kid not being disciplined was asked to leave with his parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The parents are both employed and temp left work to come to the meeting. Why would they take him home if not ordered to do so? That’s even if we believe they were asked to take him home — which I personally question since this school is run by nitwits. This isn’t on them, however trashy and MAGA they are, this is on school officials. I predict the bogus charges against the parents by an attention craving first year county prosecutor will be dismissed and the district and its county ISD will be successful sued for a nine-figure settlement.

Well, you obviously do not want the precedent of the parents being held responsible. Next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sheriff is on 760 WRJ talk radio right now questioning if school and its county ISD policies and protocols were followed. Clearly insinuating they were not followed.

not surprised

Is this the same sheriff who was trashing the prosecutor for charging the parents? Maybe he's figured out which way the wind is blowing for his re-election.

No, the sheriff is clearly in support of charging the parents. Watch any interview with him - it’s clear.

Thx. What I read (I thought in Freep) must have mischaracterized him, or I misunderstood what I read.

[Anonymous]

Feherty the heck is freep?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The alleged request that they take him home sounds like fabricated CYA to me. School discipline is black and white. Either he was being kicked out of school for the day or days or he wasn’t. He wasn’t. Period end of story. I personally don’t believe school officials “suggested” he leave school at all. It is a bit nonsensical that a kid not being disciplined was asked to leave with his parents.

You seem like you might be familiar with the situation, enough to know what the loopholes are. Interesting.

You really think these parents and those like them would not have raised holy hell about this kid being kicked out of school?

The school was asking the parents to do the right thing and take him home, but they refused. He was old enough to be home by himself. Obviously, the parents knew he was a risk to himself or someone else, or they would have taken him home. Yet, at the same time, they would not get him the help he was literally crying out for.

They only cared for themselves, as you know (see your post).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sheriff is on 760 WRJ talk radio right now questioning if school and its county ISD policies and protocols were followed. Clearly insinuating they were not followed.

not surprised

Is this the same sheriff who was trashing the prosecutor for charging the parents? Maybe he's figured out which way the wind is blowing for his re-election.

The sheriff is as RINO as they come, with a sterling career, so I’m not sure where this fake narrative is coming from that he’s some right wing wack job. The prosecutor went to two degree mills and just assumed office this year.

The prosecutor attended Alma College, which is a perfectly respectable regional liberal arts college. Her law degree is from Wayne State University, an R1.

Interesting that people would attack the prosecutor and not the parents choice of lawyers. Huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The sheriff has stated in no uncertain terms several times that there is NO evidence the gun was secured in anyway. None.

AND there is no way the guidance counselor followed policy here.

Not sure why there can’t be numerous responsible parties here, because there clearly are.

The parents storage of the gun is not illegal.

The district will be sued for a billion with a B dollars before the end of the week.

Right. I really don't see how they are going to get much more of a criminal charge beyond negligence. Unless it can be proven they knew he took the gun the school/ they gave it to him at school.

The text from his mom telling him to "just not get caught" searching for ammunition is going to age very badly.

+1

Ya think?????

This case could not be more obvious. These parents, my god.

[Anonymous]

Prosecutors may go after school’s leaders, great. They could have inspected backpack and locker.

[Anonymous]

What law was the kid breaking google searching bullets on his iPhone? Spoiler alert: None.

That factoid hurts the school district in the civil suit far more than the parents in the bogus criminal case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutors may go after school’s leaders, great. They could have inspected backpack and locker.

0% chance. This is political. Politicians — including the prosecutor — aren’t going to help civil attorneys win an even bigger lawsuit against local taxpayers by charging anyone at the school with negligence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What law was the kid breaking google searching bullets on his iPhone? Spoiler alert: None.

That factoid hurts the school district in the civil suit far more than the parents in the bogus criminal case.

You answered your own question, then proceeded to contradict yourself. Well done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feherty the heck is freep?

Freep is the Detroit Free Press.