|
Maryland stalking statute
§3–802. (a) In this section: (1) “stalking” means a malicious course of conduct that includes approaching or pursuing another where: (i) the person intends to place or knows or reasonably should have known the conduct would place another in reasonable fear: 1. A. of serious bodily injury; B. of an assault in any degree; C. of rape or sexual offense as defined by §§ 3–303 through 3–308 of this title or attempted rape or sexual offense in any degree; D. of false imprisonment; or E. of death; or 2. that a third person likely will suffer any of the acts listed in item 1 of this item; or (ii) the person intends to cause or knows or reasonably should have known that the conduct would cause serious emotional distress to another; and (2) “stalking” includes conduct described in item (1) of this subsection that occurs: (i) in person; (ii) by electronic communication, as defined in § 3–805 of this subtitle; or (iii) through the use of a device that can pinpoint or track the location of another without the person’s knowledge or consent. (b) The provisions of this section do not apply to conduct that is: (1) performed to ensure compliance with a court order; (2) performed to carry out a specific lawful commercial purpose; or (3) authorized, required, or protected by local, State, or federal law. (c) A person may not engage in stalking. (d) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 5 years or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both. (e) A sentence imposed under this section may be separate from and consecutive to or concurrent with a sentence for any other crime based on the acts establishing a violation of this section. |
It really really is not the "Textbook definition" of stalking. |
|
Virginia
§ 18.2-60.3. Stalking; penalty. A. Any person, except a law-enforcement officer, as defined in § 9.1-101, and acting in the performance of his official duties, and a registered private investigator, as defined in § 9.1-138, who is regulated in accordance with § 9.1-139 and acting in the course of his legitimate business, who on more than one occasion engages in conduct, either in person or through any other means, including by mail, telephone, or an electronically transmitted communication, directed at another person with the intent to place, or when he knows or reasonably should know that the conduct places that other person in reasonable fear of death, criminal sexual assault, or bodily injury to that other person or to that other person's family or household member is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. If the person contacts or follows or attempts to contact or follow the person at whom the conduct is directed after being given actual notice that the person does not want to be contacted or followed, such actions shall be prima facie evidence that the person intended to place that other person, or reasonably should have known that the other person was placed, in reasonable fear of death, criminal sexual assault, or bodily injury to himself or a family or household member. DC Code of the District of Columbia § 22–3133. Stalking. (a) It is unlawful for a person to purposefully engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific individual: (1) With the intent to cause that individual to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress; (2) That the person knows would cause that individual reasonably to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress; or (3) That the person should have known would cause a reasonable person in the individual’s circumstances to: (A) Fear for his or her safety or the safety of another person; (B) Feel seriously alarmed, disturbed, or frightened; or (C) Suffer emotional distress. (b) This section does not apply to constitutionally protected activity. (c) Where a single act is of a continuing nature, each 24-hour period constitutes a separate occasion. (d) The conduct on each of the occasions need not be the same as it is on the others. Only in DC proper could you even make the shadow of the argument that it’s stalking, and it would be an enormous stretch since MIL only shows up when the house is expected to be empty and literally does nothing |
And when they find out it is your elderly MIL and you don't reveal it the relationship, they will think YOU are the one with the mental disorder. |
|
It’s creepy behavior, and shouldn’t be normalized because it’s a relative.
“Below are examples of behaviors or acts that could qualify as a stalking offense: -Following a person (victim) from one location to another -Repeatedly texting or calling another person -Showing up at a person’s house or residence without his/her permission -Waiting for a person at his/her workplace or home without consent -Sending threatening messages or voice notes on social media platforms -Sending another person unwanted packages or gifts” https://www.virginiacriminallawfirm.com/stalking/ |
|
It’s stalking in the common sense definition.
Legal definitions for prosecuting is totally different, but can be altered by appealing and loving up the court system. Or by legislation. Stalking, spying, threatening, intimidating, blocking. All are legal terms. And different mental terms. |
You are so vile. |
As a mom of boys I’m certain you need therapy. Your job is to raise your children and let them go. You are already acting like a jealous ex girlfriend. You’ve already assumed any woman who comes into your son’s lives is there to take them away from you. You don’t want to let your sons grow up and let them go. Not normal. |
Raising them to be adults and respecting their autonomy, of course. But estrangement is sad. That’s not an outcome to be celebrated. Warranted or not it’s a sad thing. |
What a load. You biddies always assume the wife is manipulating the husband and you want her walking on eggshells when she tells her husband. Op can opine away all she wants. Her husband is a grown man who can and will decide for himself. This would bug me and I would feel free to express my opinion. |
Horrible advice. Who are you weird deceitful people? |
That poor son. |
Exactly. You know these posters promoting secrecy have terrible relationships and are manipulative - like mil- as heck. |
Great advice. If she’s being manipulative, continue the dysfunction and be manipulative too. /s |
|