
It didn't go over my head. And actually, yeah...I am fine with not having a job so my kids can participate in and enjoy sports, music, and other activities. There are people with different priorities than you. if you really "doubt" that, you should expand your horizons a bit. |
You don’t have to be unemployed for your kids to do these things. You just need someone to drive your kids there. It’s fine to just say you don’t want to have a job. That actually makes sense. |
I'm the pp that's posted a few times already (mom of 4, military husband.) I'm not at all surprised. In my kids' schools, the buses don't even correspond with the end times of many sports/activities. If you are depending on the school bus/after school activities bus to get your kid home from practice during the school year, you should probably verify now exactly what time practice ends and what days/times the activity bus goes. Another poster upthread mentioned that the coaches try very hard to be conscience of a working parent's schedule and that has not been my experience at all-but I'm sure it varies by school/sport/coach. |
...doing nothing? |
Well if he doesn’t support your working, that is a separate relationship issue that has nothing to do with the original question about logistics. |
I’m that PP. You should all move to Loudoun. HS doesn’t even dismiss until 4:18. Short after-school activities run until 5:30 (like clubs) and most sports run until 6:30 or later. Working is a total non issue. And the kids get to sleep in to boot! Better for everyone. Highly recommend. Plus my husband is an involved parent and doesn’t tell me the kids are my problem, even when I was a SAHM. |
So was there a consensus on this thread? I'd love to know the "easiest time" to stay at home. We all know it's not easy. |
Forever |
I don’t know if it makes a difference but he earns a seven figure income. I would probably earn 100-150k if I’m lucky. He would earn 20x what I earn. This is not what the thread is about. I would like to go back to work whether I earn 50k or 200k. Even if I earned 300-400k, it would make no difference in our lifestyle financially, which is why I have not gone back to work. As others have said 0-5 or 0-7 is ideal. Moms often have multiple kids so you would have to go back to work when one kid is 2 or 3. |
DP here. I used to be a working mom and am now a SAHM. When I used to work, it was stressful for me to get my one child to sports practice one day per week. I tried to find a PT afternoon sitter and I wanted to be the one to drive my kids to school. |
Younger years is when the kids need you most. |
The answer to this question should be based only on what's best for the children, not the parents. But if you read all the comments you will see that only a small percentage address the issue from that point of view. It's sad.
|
Can't you just hire a nanny (or several) instead of worrying about ubers and other transportation logistics? |
Easier for the mom? Or better for the children? Obviously some women plan to not work forever, and rather than just say so they make excuses, as seen by their comments here. But for most people, working becomes pretty easy once the kids are late elementary. Especially if you have no more than 2 kids and a functional spouse. I loved being home with babies/young kids and would never trade those years with them stay home in the high school years. My kids do all the activities they want and we have no issues getting them there with our work schedules. |
No, PP doesn’t want a job badly enough that she wants somebody else to drive around her kids. I don’t understand why people twist themselves in knots to prove that somebody doesn’t mean what they said. |