HAve they been or can they be charged with child neglect and/or contributing to a delquincy of a minor or similar charges? |
I don't think they are irrational or mentally ill or anything else people are throwing out. I think they are like a lot of parents these days, selfish and entitled. Once again take a look at the parenting forum and the number of posts where teenagers are engaging in unhealthy behaviors and the majority of posters always reply, it's no big deal, so hovering over your kid, you are going to ruin your relationship with them if you set any sort of limits. |
They also hired prominent lawyers for themselves but left him with a public defender. |
I've wondered about this the entire time. I'd love to hear their lawyer's assessment of this. |
| In this day and age in the US, there is really very few (isolated) people who are actually hunting for survival. Everyone else is hunting for sport or in some areas for population control. There could really be a cap on how many guns are actually needed in a permitted setting. |
|
I'm tempted to blame the school at least in part. But as other PPs have pointed out, it isn't necessarily as easy to force a kid to leave the school these days as it once was (or should be.)
Here's a case in point: I have a kid at BCC, where a classmate recently assaulted another student (younger and much smaller) with a chair, so badly that the victim was hospitalized and required stitches. Within minutes of the news of this attack circulating around the school, as kids were being held in their classrooms rather than rotating to the next class as scheduled, tons of kids including my own were texting one another that it must be a particular kid. And it was. The kid who committed the assaulted another BCC student was well-known as violent and 'a little off' to quote my kid. He had been 'expelled' or moved from Westland MS and at least one other HS. And by the way, after the assault, he or his friends then apparently circulated rumors of an attack (rumors are either bombs or guns) on the school. In this case, everyone was lucky, relatively speaking - there was only one person hurt in this latest incident, and the wider bomb/gun threat to the school was a hoax. Still, this kid was known to be violent from previous incidents stretching back more than 4 years, and he was still moved around the MCPS system all throughout that time. Will schools be more cautious in the future? I hope so. At minimum school administrators have to assume - even here in the liberal DMV - that every violent kid poses a risk of a mass shooting. Because even if that worst case doesn't happen, it could have been your kid or mine who was beaten with a chair by a student that everyone knew was a threat. |
| Seems there are many public school bureaucrats in this thread trying to divert liability away from the school. “They were scared of a lawsuit”?! Well, now children are dead, 2,000 children are scared for life, and they’re fixin’ to lose a lawsuit that’s infinitely larger than anything this family could have ever sued them for. |
Most likely their lawyers are being funded by an organization tied to gun rights.The org. did not offer to represent their son. It’s a boutique law office, no way they could afford this on their own |
My kids have never been called to the principal's office, and are teens about to go to good colleges. But I think you are imagining an idealized 70s that didn't exist. Or you are just okay with the rampant discrimination that existed. Do you really think a white boy who wasn't poor would have been treated the way you are imagining? Yes, they'd just escort the Black teens off (even if they'd done nothing wrong), but I flat-out don't believe your fantasies with respect to kids like Crumbley. |
The lawsuit is happening regardless of what DCUM thinks. |
| WaPo now reporting the letter sent by the superintendent yesterday to parents outlining the chronology of events with this kid at the school. Apparently, the report by the teacher and meeting with parents that day all stayed at the guidance counselor level. The principal and VP were never looped in. Wow. |
This. The benefactors don’t care about the son - they know his case isn’t winnable. |
|
The latest WaPo reporting on that letter:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/05/oxford-shooting-school-investigation-ethan-crumbley/ |
This. And the school district will settle long before they ever go to court. They dropped the ball in a tragic, irreparable way. At a minimum, multiple people at the school level need to lose their jobs. Not saying they will, but they should. Whoever the highest ranking person is who knew, didn’t alert anyone higher up or police, and sent the kid back to class. |
|
The problem is we've normalized deviant behavior in schools.
Kids can wander around in the elementary school classrooms and they are not disciplined. During serious infractions (chair throwing etc) the behaved students are disciplined in that they have to exit the classroom and lose instruction time. There is huge pressure at the high school level not to suspend students or get police involved due to Restorative Justice. Stats are kept by school and by district of suspensions and police involvement. It is supposed to be a good thing not to suspend students for misbehavior. |